I just checked. No you did not before the majority of thoses posts. Your earliest mention of actual reasoning for why LUV was any different from his scum meta was 661. There was only one post in my quotes there that came after that.In post 1064, Vecna wrote:And I did engage several times, in great detail, why I believe the read on LUV is wrong.
Youre awarded 1 suspicion point.
Following it up after that point doesn't change the fact that you were shading The DEO without explaining why you believed them to be wrong beforehand.