In post 14379, NoticeMeSenpai wrote: In post 13858, Leonshade wrote:In this situation, scum decided to kill Maxous. Maxous was a bold kill due to the result with Creature. So why was he chosen, if scum was trying to PR hunt, over CloudKicker, Gorkington, Senpai and nancy? nancy's been pretty loud all game, so she's a safe choice to not be doctor. Meanwhile CK, Gorkington and Senpai's slots have been much more laid back all game, and would all be good candidates for a doc hunt kill.
Conclusion: there's scum in {CK, Gork, Senpai}. I was scumreading CK anyway, but it wouldn't surprise me for there to be at least two scum here. With two/three scum in CK/Gork/Senpai, Maxous being a doc would be a pretty obvious conclusion for scum to draw.
Maxous asked to be trusted on Pine, said he thought it was a doc protect, TR me, lurked a lot.
Like, he even said Maxous was a decent doc candidate then goes and makes this post. It's gross.
I didn't read Maxous's ISO before making that post, I was going purely off of claims. Maxous was a decent doc candidate, but not the only one. If his ISO makes it that obvious that he's the doc, my point is moot, but there's no reason to assume I'm scum because of it.
In post 14380, NoticeMeSenpai wrote: In post 13859, Leonshade wrote:The idea that Maxous was a manipulative kill is really hard for me to believe. Even if Creature is somehow scum with davesaz or Vecna, killing Maxous for the sake of read manipulation or confusion wouldn't be worth it. If Creature + one other is scum, it's better to keep Maxous alive to either keep suspicion off the scum, or keep suspicion on Maxous.
So Maxous being killed as a result of doc hunting makes sense, and I think scum had a really good grasp on who the doc was due to the claims plus scum member PoE.
In post 13860, Vecna wrote:^ good post, allthough you couldve made it as scum as well. but keep em coming and I might start showing you some more love again.
Theres something more going on though........But I probably really shouldnt speculate on that.
I think I got what you meant there btw Alisae - with you not wanting to discuss it.
Really not a good post. It was obvious who Parthenon was yesterday if you bothered to read the game at all.
If it was that obvious, I didn't know it. I think I know who you're talking about now, but I didn't know beforehand.
In post 14382, NoticeMeSenpai wrote:
I also feel like a town!Leon would have recognized the fakeclaim there for what it was. RC does that shit all the time to try to avoid being nightkilled.
Caveat being if he hasn't really played with RC it's NAI, it's just a really quick conclusion to jump to here I think, just assuming that RC didn't lie about being basically 1s bp as a player with an ego and a history of being nightkilled? Hell, as a player who said multiple times last day phase he was dead that night, even.
I have one finished game with RC, Spyro the Dragon. I did have the thought that RC might be fakeclaiming to avoid being NK'd, but he hadn't come clean by that point in D5 so I worked under the assumption he was telling the truth.
I know you were scumreading me before, but most of your points look like confbias. You're assuming that I'm trying to set up a mislynch instead of gamesolving, and you're assuming that I noticed the same things you did (Maxous being obvdoc, the identity of Parthenon) when I didn't. Assume that I'm town who didn't notice those things, does it look improbable that I would come to my conclusions? Both Vecna and CK generally agreed with my reasoning and nobody called me out on the same faults you did, so it's clear that the things obvious to you weren't obvious to many others.
"I still cant believe Leonshade just talked his way out of getting lynched by posting Lion King gifs"
- Vecna