Mini 1935: Green Haired UPick (Game Over)
Forum rules
- Tarkus
-
Tarkus Goon
- Tarkus
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 451
- Joined: February 20, 2017
- Location: Sen's Fortress
- CookieDotJay
-
CookieDotJay Townie
- CookieDotJay
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 90
- Joined: July 29, 2017
- TwoInAMillion
-
TwoInAMillion Mafia Scum
- TwoInAMillion
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2841
- Joined: July 21, 2017
I never said anything about the first claim being true, you are fabricating my statement. If, assuming the millers are one town and one scum, and you lynch both, the scum player has much more to lose because there are always fewer scum players than town players. If the scum player was the second player, the optimal move would be not to counterclaim, and you would stand a better chance at long term survival.In post 374, CookieDotJay wrote:Let me get this straight- you think that if there are 2 miller claims, the second claim is usually true, and if the first claim is true then the second claim is still probably true?- CookieDotJay
-
CookieDotJay Townie
- CookieDotJay
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 90
- Joined: July 29, 2017
This was from when I asked you to consider Tarkus' perspectiveIn post 357, TwoInAMillion wrote:No, because he should know that a second miller claim is likely town.- TwoInAMillion
-
TwoInAMillion Mafia Scum
- TwoInAMillion
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2841
- Joined: July 21, 2017
The scum perspective?In post 378, CookieDotJay wrote:
This was from when I asked you to consider Tarkus' perspectiveIn post 357, TwoInAMillion wrote:No, because he should know that a second miller claim is likely town.- iDanyboy
-
iDanyboy Goon
- iDanyboy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 969
- Joined: November 18, 2011
- Location: England
Please respond to Post 361/362.In post 369, TwoInAMillion wrote:
Usually if there are two miller claims the second one is the correct one. Scum won't fake miller claim if they know there's a real miller in the game.In post 366, iDanyboy wrote:But your second reason doesn't fit with what you've posted and you are guilty of your first reason.- CookieDotJay
-
CookieDotJay Townie
- CookieDotJay
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 90
- Joined: July 29, 2017
Accusing me of fabricating your statements when you literally said that if Tarkus was town he shouldn't have assumed you were scum is interesting though.
For the record I remember things and don't just take account of one post in these 1V1s so try to do the same.
ALSO when you claimed you said you didn't realise Tarkus claimed miller which makes your whole point bullshit anyways- TwoInAMillion
-
TwoInAMillion
- TwoInAMillion
-
TwoInAMillion Mafia Scum
- TwoInAMillion
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2841
- Joined: July 21, 2017
Not at all. I based my Tarkus read on after I found out he claimed miller. Your BSing is getting really old.In post 381, CookieDotJay wrote:Accusing me of fabricating your statements when you literally said that if Tarkus was town he shouldn't have assumed you were scum is interesting though.
For the record I remember things and don't just take account of one post in these 1V1s so try to do the same.
ALSO when you claimed you said you didn't realise Tarkus claimed miller which makes your whole point bullshit anyways- iDanyboy
-
iDanyboy Goon
- iDanyboy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 969
- Joined: November 18, 2011
- Location: England
When I asked you if you had any reads you said no.In post 382, TwoInAMillion wrote:See 364.
Why do you know say you town read RC and scum read Cookie but you didn't say that when I asked you?- TwoInAMillion
-
TwoInAMillion Mafia Scum
- TwoInAMillion
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2841
- Joined: July 21, 2017
It was a day or two later.In post 384, iDanyboy wrote:
When I asked you if you had any reads you said no.In post 382, TwoInAMillion wrote:See 364.
Why do you know say you town read RC and scum read Cookie but you didn't say that when I asked you?- iDanyboy
-
iDanyboy Goon
- iDanyboy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 969
- Joined: November 18, 2011
- Location: England
- CookieDotJay
-
CookieDotJay Townie
- CookieDotJay
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 90
- Joined: July 29, 2017
Wow, do I need to rail out the logic train for you? Let's have some facts.
When asked to consider whether town!Tarkus' perspective, you said that he should think you're town based on the miller claims, while claiming you are justified in scumreading him, both because you claimed second.
You place more value in the second miller claim because you do not think scum would make a miller claim if they knew there was a miller in the game already.
You did not know there was already a miller claim when you claimed miller.
See if you can make a deduction- TwoInAMillion
-
TwoInAMillion Mafia Scum
- TwoInAMillion
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2841
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- iDanyboy
-
iDanyboy Goon
- iDanyboy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 969
- Joined: November 18, 2011
- Location: England
- iDanyboy
-
iDanyboy
- CookieDotJay
-
CookieDotJay Townie
- CookieDotJay
- RadiantCowbells
-
RadiantCowbells Smooth Criminal
- RadiantCowbells
- Smooth Criminal
- Smooth Criminal
- Posts: 70566
- Joined: February 24, 2013
- Contact:
- CookieDotJay
-
CookieDotJay Townie
- CookieDotJay
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 90
- Joined: July 29, 2017
- RadiantCowbells
-
RadiantCowbells Smooth Criminal
- RadiantCowbells
- Smooth Criminal
- Smooth Criminal
- Posts: 70566
- Joined: February 24, 2013
- Contact:
- CookieDotJay
-
CookieDotJay Townie
- CookieDotJay
- RadiantCowbells
-
RadiantCowbells Smooth Criminal
- RadiantCowbells
- Smooth Criminal
- Smooth Criminal
- Posts: 70566
- Joined: February 24, 2013
- Contact:
- CookieDotJay
-
CookieDotJay Townie
- CookieDotJay
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 90
- Joined: July 29, 2017
- CookieDotJay
- RadiantCowbells
- RadiantCowbells
- CookieDotJay
- RadiantCowbells
- iDanyboy
- TwoInAMillion
- CookieDotJay
- iDanyboy
- TwoInAMillion
- iDanyboy
- TwoInAMillion
- CookieDotJay
- iDanyboy
- TwoInAMillion
- CookieDotJay
- TwoInAMillion
- CookieDotJay
- Tarkus