Page 6
I like the reasoning in Siv's
132, however, I don't like that he says that it almost makes him lock scum. While the back-pedalling is scummy I think it's still possible it could have come from town. Do you still think this slot is scum and have they done anything else you consider scummy to back up you scumread if you still have one?
Page 7
In post 158, Mulch wrote:I think some of Llama questions early game are useless and aren't really an attempt to game solve. Thoughts?
Took a look into this. The first question to Clock sounds a bit like something you might find during RQS. I don't see it being entirely helpful besides getting a slight idea on Clock's meta. I like the question to Siv a bit better though. Something that encourages discussion better related to the game although I'm not quite sure what he expected to get out of asking someone what they think about Clock answering a basic question about RVS. Seemed NAI to me. Later in post 24 his questions seem a bit more helpful as they could potentially lead to something AI.
In post 163, JaeReed wrote:VOTE: llama
I don't townread him. I want more from your slot though. We can push this if it'll help. I'll check that game once I'm back from the hospital.
This seems opportunistic. A new player comes in and says they want to push Llama who throughout the game has been called unhelpful towards moving the game or null then suddenly jumps on the wagon.
Page 8
In post 184, WhemeStar wrote:
Also didn't like the L-3, this can be Siv just not knowing he doesn't need to say L-3, only L-2 or L-1, or scum trying to be careful in their play
Can you explain what you mean by scum trying to be careful in their play? How does stating L-3 make you think that?
In post 190, SIV36 wrote:
Considering my (limited) experience, mafia could be just subtly back-sitting (taking it easy) as they watch the town rip themselves apart. But the problem in filtering people based on that is that half the town are doing the same thing.
I've liked basically all of your posts up to this. You just stated several reads including people you were willing to lynch but this paragraph is basically saying anyone could be scum which kind of sounds like you're opening up your options for later or to be wrong after a lynch goes through that you pushed.
Not a fan of this. I haven't played many games with Mulch so I don't know if this is normal or not but it's veru weak reasoning, scum could do it easily, and it doesn't help us get a read on Mulch either. Plus it's opportunistic.
Page 10
Ginngies list looks good to me. I'm getting a good town impression.
Not sure what game advancing imformation Mulch plans on getting from asking "what if I flip town?"
In post 241, Mulch wrote:VOTE: giningie
You know I will flip town and therefore are being akward when asked how you would react if I flip town.
OMGUS?
In post 244, Mulch wrote:You may say this but people will look back on this later game and see
The difference between you and me is that I don't truly care if I'm lynched but you do care
Why don't you care if you get lynched?
Page 11
In post 255, Mulch wrote:You have it because your scum. As of now, I am having no further contact with you. Enjoy the scum lynch tmrw if I'm lynched.
Why wouldn't you want to talk to him more to try to get a better read?
That selfvote... can't tell if Mulch is scum or anti-town.
