PatheticIn post 427, humaneatingmonkey wrote:I'd like to hear more about why I'm scum
VOTE: Flubb
That's L-1 again
It's so strange that you can town read NM for tone and then say something like thisIn post 438, Katyusha wrote:Confidently stating "Flubb is town" and then giving a reason that definitely should not come attached with that confidence is definitely a white knight - a bad defense on a slot while it's being pushed that does little to actually dismantle the wagon.
Is this your case? Is it a case? lmao quit vote parkingIn post 388, Flubbernugget wrote:HUM:
HUM has now tried to push two quicklynches, one with no claim. I've been trying to respect that I'm getting to the point on this site where the scumtells I am used to are stagnating with time, but this is seriously inexcusable, and its honestly pretty frustrating complacent town seems to be to his actions.
And if you believe HUM that advocating lynches like this is garnering good information from reactions, please ask yourself why HUM has provided ZERO analysis on how people reacted to his requests. And no, saying "hop ruined the flub reactions" isn't an excuse.
VOTE: humaneatingmonkey
This is a policy lynch at worst.
except it's literally d1 and you dont always just put out a 3 player pool that has scum in 10:3In post 426, UC Voyager wrote:what he is doing is POE. if we lynch X, X, and X, we will hit scum. it has worked really good many times. what do you find bad about it. the fact that a player is there that you think should not be there?
???????????????????In post 456, Flubbernugget wrote:It's so strange that you can town read NM for tone and then say something like this
had the same thought but im engrossed in spilling the tea on hopkirk rn lmaoIn post 466, sheepsaysmeep wrote:does nobody else want to talk about how wolfy ucv's popin was
Perhaps I misunderstood your point?In post 463, Katyusha wrote:???????????????????In post 456, Flubbernugget wrote:It's so strange that you can town read NM for tone and then say something like this
I did address your reasoning on n_m (I absolutely have seen him make sense in town games before) and pointed out good points on why he seemed town at the time besides tone.
Do you think I white knighted not_mafia in a scummy way? Otherwise, why call this out?
pedit: I think he was saying there's one scum in the lurkers/inactives which I think is a reasonable read of the gamestate
theres also like significantly more to the hopkirk scumread than his townread of you but we'll get to that - im still in the midst of writing the postIn post 184, Katyusha wrote:Not_Mafia is kind of obvtown and your meta where he's more useful as scum is definitely wrong since i've seen him play a decent towngame before (he mislynched me but like i was playing like complete crap anyway and it's also on my ~secret main~; he solved the game in lylo and would have won if it werent for a stupid mechanic that got him instalynched)...besides decent tone24 and 40 were also good posts that show townie thought process