Well this is WIFOM I think.
Nero was highlighting Taco as scum somewhat (to paraphrase). I think if I was scum, it would be brazen to lynch the guy I was scum-reading the previous day as the link is so obvious - I would anticipate the town spotting it and applying pressure, hence I am leaning the other way to you.
Whereas I believe you are saying, nero = threat to scum!taco, therefore must die.
The second part of my argument is that because mafia chose Nero, it creates a scenario where Taco appears scummy, but that does not prove he is scum. Therefore the real scum can manipulate us into a mislynch, personally I think that is easier for them, than trying to talk out of the obvious nero/taco link from day 1. This is also coupled with a number of stating that Taco's normal play appears scummy without their help.
What no one knows yet is which one of us has been duped. Obviously Taco is likely to be either scum or town so only one of us is right here which is the fun bit of this game
I don't think either of us will convince the other one that our theory is more compelling than our own, but that's ok. I think both theories are quite clear and it means that we should hopefully see other players pick one side or the other - this should be useful for the town later. Of course, everyone could just ignore us and move on. It would be really helpful if everyone chips in though of course.
In terms of your last sentence, It was not my intention to steer you anywhere, I am just theorising and presenting an alternative line of thought. You gave me the advice of "you be you" which someone gave me in my last game (now complete so I can reference that!) which I think is advice we are both heeding, despite the inevitable disagreements, it's not personal and we can be glad we only need a majority to lynch
Overall I think it was a cunning play by scum to target Taco but I think I have caught it. I hope I'm right!