Mini Normal 1982: anagrams (endgame) (egad, men!)

[UnaBombaH]

People are misinterpreting and nitpicking on that one post, and I'd say for very stupid reasoning..

I literally said "town!chill above", not that I suddenly thin he is town.
My read on him is a living, interactive thing.
That one post doesn't mean my whole read on him changed - it means that I thought that one post fitted town!Chill.

[UnaBombaH]

Like seriously, read my very short ISO. You should have NO TROUBLE seeing where my susp. is at.

[UnaBombaH]

To bring something more to the table: I can now see profi+chill being an attempt to get todays lynchfocus on me.
Profis reasoning for voting me feels forced, and chill is acting very opportunistic.
Yet again, I'd say theres at least one scum there too.
So either Chill has been pocketed by the scummys (profi/Chuumba), or he is the scum in both interactions.
I'd say a Chill-lynch is a very good one today.

I'm also very suspicious about everyone who felt the need to heavily discredit Boons D1 reads.
To solely lean on those might not be healthy for the scumhunt, but to disregard them completely makes the value of an already short D1 even less..I got what people were asking for, and Boon helped his wagon speed down the hill himself, but to me D1's have been very valuable for gamesolving time and time again.

[UnaBombaH]

I also don't see any logic in Nero being NK'd.
Can't spot any crumbs, and his read on Boon was already incorrect.
He did push very heavily towards Serg though..

[UnaBombaH]

I might be stupid for trusting Dunk so unconditionally here, but I really just do.
Fykus on the other hand can be scum.
I still like Hawk so far, but he is a new player to me, so no strong hunches.

[UnaBombaH]

That came across more fence-sitty than I actually am, it's just that my townleans are very few and weak in this game, while I have a few scumreads that feel strong.

Resulting in me going back to v0.9 - Paranoiuna

I might not seem town to everyone (something I have been getting better at), but I think almost no one does right now.

[Tchill13]

i love how i call out una for lazy play and im the one he wants lynched. opportunistic vote? yes. i want you to play better.

[Dunkerdoodles]

i love how i call out una for lazy play and im the one he wants lynched. opportunistic vote? yes. i want you to play better.

ok this post is really scummy to me

[Dunkerdoodles]

also that is like 90% town!una
im reconsidering tchill now

[Dunkerdoodles]

Phoneposting for now, will be on comp. later today.
I believe in Boons gutreads, at least as far as to have some confirmation my own initial reads.

I'm feeling a slight disconnect from this game though, and that is mainly because I didn't get to participate a lot D1...

I'll look for quotes when I have a keypad and mouse,

but for now I have no trouble seeing Chumba+Chill, OR one of them pocketing the other.
I do not know why Chill scumleans me, maybe its because of my activity so far.

I do not like the fact he calls me a good townplayer, he knows my ego is very easy to masturbate.

^Town!Chill above

i said i liked una earlier but i don't like this quick turn around

VOTE: una

oh man i finally feel good about a read on dunker. i hope i'm right lol.

is this a tr or sr i can't tell

[Tchill13]

its a tr dunker.

[UnaBombaH]

its a tr dunker.

.....

[Dunkerdoodles]

its a tr dunker.

oh
yay i guess?

to me it feels like una vs tchill is tvs

[Tchill13]

i mean im not gonna sit here and turn mafia into dissproving boons d1 reads. if you want to lynch me and save me from that garbage go ahead. that's just lazy town play thats not confident enough to play independantly. if you agree with boon thats fine. explain why. if you make a case cus "boon said"... well you'll get no credit from me in fact i will discredit you. Because that's lazy and it won't win us the game.

[Tchill13]

we get a nice fine quick day 1 and it manages to seep into day 2 because "the all seeing eye" had a few worshipers that are blindly following.

[profii]

To bring something more to the table: I can now see profi+chill being an attempt to get todays lynchfocus on me.
Profis reasoning for voting me feels forced, and chill is acting very opportunistic.
Yet again, I'd say theres at least one scum there too.
So either Chill has been pocketed by the scummys (profi/Chuumba), or he is the scum in both interactions.
I'd say a Chill-lynch is a very good one today.

I'm also very suspicious about everyone who felt the need to heavily discredit Boons D1 reads.
To solely lean on those might not be healthy for the scumhunt, but to disregard them completely makes the value of an already short D1 even less..I got what people were asking for, and Boon helped his wagon speed down the hill himself, but to me D1's have been very valuable for gamesolving time and time again.

i can admit that a bit... although I stand by what I said, I also said I am sturuggling to pin anything down last sentence of 395 so I am kinda waiting for something to happen.

I think most of the day so far has been me vs Chumba so I’m waiting for it to move on a bit - I know that doesn’t help myself given you just said there is a link, despite my Taco theory, turns out no one jumped on him and otherwise there is nothing scummy about Chumba really- he says he is scum reading Taco but even he said Day 1 reads hold little weight


I am not sure heavily discrediting the boom reads is the appropriate context. I know you posted that you like to return to D1 but it’s still early in day 2 (in terms of events and discussions rather than literal time imo) so for Fykus and Dunk to really go hard on those reads is too much right now for me because it creates a hiding place

I also noted Dunks was on 2 votes and I was on 3 so I thought me voting there would make people think more about me trying to self preserve rather than look at my Scum reads so I thought that was not town-useful - where as drawing out a series of posts from you, has been.

[profii]

I am saying to myself through this game tchill is going to be hard for me to read. The only thing I really note is a low percentage of posts are assertions that someone is scum because of something he has gone back and read, whereas a lot of posts are “what you said there is scummy”

It seems to be more discredit the player rather than provide analysis- the confusion for me is I’m agreeing with who he is discrediting. But that just gives me self-WIFOM... am I being led?

[Tchill13]

my analysis is scum are probably laying back and letting town lead town to a mislynch thats fueled by boons read... if i had to guess. So what if i said tacos was scum?

[profii]

There is no point speculating on what ifs

[profii]

Ebwop everyone is going to point my whole theory is what if

In context, you either think he is scum or not. By saying what if, you don’t, so no point answering

[Tchill13]

VOTE: sergtacos

OK buddy.

[profii]

Lol fine

There was a suggestion on day 1 that Taco has a scummy playstyle,

Firstly, do you agree?
Secondly, can you share what he did to cause your vote and explain why?

Last one- I’ll assume you are not on board with my theory if you are voting but do you acknowledge it as a possible option or do you say 0% chance

[eth0s]

Will revisit in a couple hours but I don't know what I think of the Una/Tchill banter. I've been having a hard time reading una so far but I actually kinda thought the posts today were pretty town. And I also agree with much of what Tchill has said.

Why are we voting tacos again?

[eth0s]

@MOD Can we get an update on Randomidget?

[Dunkerdoodles]

VOTE: sergtacos
only voting to put some pressure