and you wonder why there are players on this site that don't want to play with you.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
your play is shit and you are just way to immature to admit it.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
I mean Golden did shit all here and then flaked out while continuing to be active sitewide and I'd lynch him for that alone. Yes, I didn't like him but I was willing to give you a chance. My problem with you is that you seemed to fencesit on Moz. There's a certain hypocrisy in shepping my read and calling Moz scum while calling me bad and wanting to blame me if Seph is scum. I'm not forcing you to unvote Seph. But I really don't care who gets lynched between you and Moz.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 774, BuJaber wrote:You didn't put roy/leeoon in your scum in 719 so you don't like the arch wagon because I am on it.
I don't think I ever said that.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 782, Nero Cain wrote:I mean Golden did shit all here and then flaked out while continuing to be active sitewide and I'd lynch him for that alone. Yes, I didn't like him but I was willing to give you a chance. My problem with you is that you seemed to fencesit on Moz. There's a certain hypocrisy in shepping my read and calling Moz scum while calling me bad and wanting to blame me if Seph is scum. I'm not forcing you to unvote Seph. But I really don't care who gets lynched between you and Moz.
not now. If Moz gets to L-1 then I'll hammer but I don't like you or want to play with you so you can die.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Mulch: Your playstile makes you hard to read. I thought that was a deliberate choice of yours.
Than the fight with Nero.
And then you send yourself at L-1.
How does that help? It is either an attemp to manipulate the players or you have very little impulsecontrol, not good in gooing furter in the game.
If you are town calm down and try to help even if you are lynched.
BuJaber:
I stated that I didn't want to vote the Archwingwaggon because I don't like any of the players on it. Could it be that you confuse me and Nero?
I wanted to ask you somethink: Why did you selfvote on day 1? This and a few posts of yours give red flags. Flaggs that made me think why is he playing so much different, than he plays in other games on the side that I checked a bit.
I found it funny that both Sephiroth and Mulch stated that they are not scum. Speciall notice to Sephiroth who is only "probably not scum"
P-Edit: Say Mulchs claim, doesn't chance anythink in this post.
Actually I am still willing to hammer Mulch.
Thought about it a bit. I give a few hours for players to react but I will hammer in a few hours.
Sorry 1-shot Rolecop is a powerrole but not one that makes me hesitate.
In post 797, StefanB wrote:Actually I am still willing to hammer Mulch.
Thought about it a bit. I give a few hours for players to react but I will hammer in a few hours.
Sorry 1-shot Rolecop is a powerrole but not one that makes me hesitate.
I’m sorry what? First, mulch unvoted so no more hammer. Second, why would you rather hammer an un-cc’ed PR rather than an afk or any other person?