Again, antitown is a preference. My read on you as antitown and scum are the same thing, but not all antitown equals scum when there is a stronger scumread on someone.In post 1174, StefanB wrote:This is so bad, ouch.In post 1171, Christopher wrote:Legitimately the reads today are based on you lot not understanding the difference between your/you’re and whose/who’s.
This is a bit silly, tbh.
The votes are based on process of elimination. (From my point of view for example Mulch, Sep: Confirmed town; Nero,Fitz: Townreads; Christopher, Lal: Not townreads, players left) and your play.
You aren't attacked for your grammer. The attacked post fit in a pattern shown in Post 1109 from Fitz.
You are attacked for what you do or don't in this game.
If you still believe that Neros 1140 is about grammar ouch. It is about wordchoice. You used anti-town, which has a different meaning than scum.
(For an example of antitown: Mulchs 1152,1153 is calling out suspected anti-townbehavior than he believes is done from town) The question is is that a slip?
So as a defence Christopher is confirming that he doesn't seem to read and understand the game, tryes to use emotion and continues to not helping.
I read you as scum/antitown or whatever you want to call it.
The fact that we’re moving past your Lynch the PR strategy doesn’t bode well for us tomorrow.