Mini 766 - Soulshift Mafia (GAME OVER!)


Forum rules
User avatar
q21
q21
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
q21
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1896
Joined: March 29, 2008
Location: Port Elizabeth, South Africa

Post Post #100 (ISO) » Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:27 pm

Post by q21 »

VOTE COUNT


4 Votes Pitstop - Xylthizlm, MafiaSSK, Riceballtail, qwints
3 Votes zwetschenhasser - Gorrad, Acemarksman, Mafiaplayer
2 Votes Mafiaplayer - Qanqan, Jazzmyn
2 Vote Xylthixlm - PhilyEc, Pitstop
1 Vote PhilyEc - zwetschenwasser

Not Voting: EVERYONE IS VOTING!

With 12 Alive it takes 7 to lynch.

The deadline is Thursday 23 April 2009.

RULES wrote:Votes should be in their own line
I haven't been enforcing this yet, but I will start to. Sometimes I skim the thread just to check for votes if this rule isn't followed then I miss some.
"I can't not give mad props to the murderbot 9000 that was q21." - Spyrex, after Scummies Invitational 2010.

You know those times when you wish you could think of something really funny or interesting to say, but just can't?... Yep, this is one of those times.
User avatar
PhilyEc
PhilyEc
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
PhilyEc
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1550
Joined: February 15, 2009
Location: Dublin
Contact:

Post Post #101 (ISO) » Fri Mar 27, 2009 2:14 pm

Post by PhilyEc »

Hmm..

[stares at vote count]

Pitstop got mobbed...
Zwet's opposition is building up gradually..
Mafiaplayer got randomed...
Xyl has got a notable amount
and...

GASP!
kortskorts (14:18:48): haylen wants more porno-related questions
SimplyAwesome64 (14:19:11): :O no it dont!
jdodge1019 (14:20:06): then why do you keep using the blowjob emoticon
SimplyAwesome64 (14:20:19): >.>
User avatar
Jazzmyn
Jazzmyn
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Jazzmyn
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1582
Joined: August 31, 2008

Post Post #102 (ISO) » Fri Mar 27, 2009 2:31 pm

Post by Jazzmyn »

qwints wrote:I don't think my suggestions have been moronic
I wasn't referring to you (if you look at the time of my post, it appears that you and I were cross posting) but to the players who continued to go on about things that they should have shut up about after it was pointed out that (a) Thanos is not paired with anyone, (b) Thanos is not a mason, and (c) not all town players are mason pairs. Of course, one of those could, in fact, be Thanos, who figured out pretty quickly what those players were miscomprehending. It would have been a good play for the SK to pretend to be equally 'confused'.
AceMarksman wrote:-jazz, you aren't making much contribution to this game. All I've seen from you are just "peanut gallery" comments that don't add much. Do you have a case on anyone? Whom do you find most scummy?
I work during the day and have to abide by government "Acceptable Internet Use" policy so I cannot post from work. I get home after 7:00 p.m. EST. Thus, I post at night and on weekends, not during the day on weekdays.

That said, who are you to talk about not contributing to the game? Before you wrote the post that I am quoting, you had posted 3 times: once to vote zwet on policy, once to make your "buttsex" comment to zwet, and once to accuse qwints of being scum and to change your vote to him. Hypocrite much?

As for your questions, keep reading and you will see that as I read the posts made since my last visit, I post my own thoughts and observations and analysis of same.

Regards,
Jazz
User avatar
Jazzmyn
Jazzmyn
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Jazzmyn
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1582
Joined: August 31, 2008

Post Post #103 (ISO) » Fri Mar 27, 2009 2:50 pm

Post by Jazzmyn »

All right. Here's the way I see things at present.

Phily was the first to introduce the nonsense about Thanos being paired with a mason, and the nonsense about everyone being paired. That wouldn't be so bad except that he continued on about it after it had been pointed out in my post #39 that this could not be the case, continued to yammer about it in his posts #42 and #43, and he only seemed to 'get' it after I repeated myself in post #44. He may very well be naive but town aligned.

Gorrad, similarly, seemed to think (or at least purported to think) that one of the masons started out paired with Thanos (post #38) but quickly resiled from that after he read my post #39. This could be the SK jumping on the idea that Phily gave him as a way to look like town, or it could be that Gorrad doesn't read. Given that Gorrad also didn't read his role PM carefully enough to know that he was supposed to confirm via PM rather than in the thread, yeah, I guess I can buy that.

MafiaSSK was the third player to purport to believe that all players in the game were in pairs, and in his post #40, he said that "there has to be one townie with SK". Yet, in his very next post (#49) he said that he is not paired with anyone. Sorry, but these two posts just do not reconcile. How can a player who purports to believe that everyone is paired with another (following the careless play by Phily) then say that he is not aligned with anyone? One of these statements cannot be true. Then, in his very next post (#67), he jumped on the Pitstop wagon that had started formulating.

More in a while about some of the other goings-on during the day, but that's enough for me to:

Unvote: Mafiaplayer
Vote: MafiaSSK


Regards,
Jazz
User avatar
Qanqan
Qanqan
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Qanqan
Townie
Townie
Posts: 91
Joined: January 18, 2009
Location: Shhh

Post Post #104 (ISO) » Fri Mar 27, 2009 6:50 pm

Post by Qanqan »

Those are good points about MafiaSSK, but Zwets vote seems like a vote with completely hollow logic, so I wouldn't mind hearing a defence (from both) because I can't decide who to vote. :(
My name is not Quanqan or Qangan~
User avatar
qwints
qwints
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
qwints
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3303
Joined: September 5, 2008

Post Post #105 (ISO) » Fri Mar 27, 2009 7:10 pm

Post by qwints »

I don't think the "contradiction" by MafiaSSK is damning, but I'll leave it to him to provide an explanation for it.

PhilyEC, please provide your analysis of events instead of simply recounting what has happened.
User avatar
PhilyEc
PhilyEc
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
PhilyEc
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1550
Joined: February 15, 2009
Location: Dublin
Contact:

Post Post #106 (ISO) » Fri Mar 27, 2009 9:06 pm

Post by PhilyEc »

qwints wrote:PhilyEC, please provide your analysis of events instead of simply recounting what has happened.
Eh? Too early for that, could help SK do some behavioural adjustments. I'll post one on page five though. (Hoping this doesnt turn into a semantics arguement of what SK are likely to do for another 2 pages)

Sorry qwints but thats how I roll.

---

Jazz, how sure are you Mafiaplayer is ze SK? (Percentage wise)
kortskorts (14:18:48): haylen wants more porno-related questions
SimplyAwesome64 (14:19:11): :O no it dont!
jdodge1019 (14:20:06): then why do you keep using the blowjob emoticon
SimplyAwesome64 (14:20:19): >.>
User avatar
PhilyEc
PhilyEc
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
PhilyEc
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1550
Joined: February 15, 2009
Location: Dublin
Contact:

Post Post #107 (ISO) » Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:09 pm

Post by PhilyEc »

EBWOP:Oh wow we're on five already, my bad qwints. I'll post something like a promised so =P

---

Analysis of Pages (1-5)

Xyl, Post 9 wrote:Vote: zwetschenwasser

This guy is in every game I'm in, and he sucks at all of them. I want to see him dead in the first five pages. Go!
I assume this was a joke vote, still it had me worried since he seemed to show a dislike for Zwet. I guess I was fearing there could be a mislynch (since we had just began).
Xyl, Post 16 wrote:Voting people for putting a second (actually third) vote on is stupid, it just makes it harder to build bandwagons.

Mafiaplayer dies right after zwet.
This one could be more serious, I believe it was later proven he meant it. Line one I agree with but line two is narrow sighted. His hunches are appearing to be Holy ones and 'the answers to all our prayers'.
I don't think its as scummy as it is eager to lead town being honest.
qwints, Post 23 wrote:I would suggest that random voting is not going to gain us anything in a game like this because only masons have extra information.
I'd argue the masons should mass claim
. Let's narrow our focus while we can.

I know this risks them being nk'd but I think two factors will prevent this.
1) Power roles are robust - it takes two kills to stop them working.
2) An unknown mason pair could prove very dangerous after the shift.
3) Killing the soulshifter as fast as possible maximizes our chances of winning.
Really it speaks for itself. Those who encourage mass claims in a setup like this are either the SK themselves or else just unknowingly helping the SK had this idea been accepted.
Xyl, Post 24 wrote:This is an absolutely horrible idea. The masons can claim if they're going to be lynched. There's no reason to claim them early; it messes up reactions and gives the scum info on who to kill.
PhilyEc, Post 27 wrote:Agreed! If we mass claim, SK will claim with his mason buddy and he'll as well know who have the rest of the roles, thus being able to pick off powers very quickly and in a manor that leaves the last powers obsolete.
Masons will gain no info and scum will need to know everything possible to win ze game.

Nobody claim.
qwints, Post 28 wrote:
I don't think masons should claim their roles
and I don't think it's even necessary for them to claim their partners.
Seems his theory shot out the window, the change in opinion so quickly is dodgy but I doubt an SK is dumb enough to get so involved so early, thus hes a non-suspect at the moment.

Zwet seems to agree with Xyl pretty strongly.
Mafiaplayer, Post 31 wrote:Policy lynches are silly because they essentially require no information, and may just kill newbtown. This is all the more likely considering that there's only one scum.
*Sprinkles with townpoints* Perhaps later I'll see why Jazz thinks hes worthy of a lynch. (Though he IS pointing out the obvious)
PhilyEc, Post 32 wrote: Anonymous Docs on 1 of the two investigators = Safest way to ensure long term investigating and increases chances of finding scum.
Okay, I thought this was the best strategy to take. Scum would have to be lucky enough to hit the doctors twice (assuming that role is in the game) and since only one person has claimed (being a cop role) we can develop long term protection of him as he weeds out one person after another~
Jazz, Post 36 wrote:I, too, disagree with the idea of masons claiming. I also think it's too early for anyone else to claim. I would suggest that we just play the game as usual for now and leave claims to a later date.

Zwets is the best candidate for a policy lynch that I have ever seen (next to killaseven and DrippingGoofball). But I don't really like policy lynches much, so I'll have to think about it some more.
Its a pretty townie response ^
AceMarksman, Post 46 wrote:I'm leaning heavily towards qwints being scum and, as much as I would like to see a zwet policy lynch, I think we should persue him. Especially considering this-
qwints wrote:I'd argue the masons should mass claim.
qwints wrote:I don't think masons should claim their roles and I don't think it's even necessary for them to claim their partners.
1) yes, let's reveal exactly whom our power roles are to the scum.
2) what good would a mason claim be if they didn't claim their partners? All that would do would severly narrow the scum's power role pool and royally screw the town over.

Thus: Unvote
Vote: qwints
+Scum Points

Ace is noming on that scum food far too keenly. Issue had been dealt with yet hes digging up corpses now.
Mafiaplayer, Post 48 wrote:Okay. Anyone who's not paired with someone else, claim. Now. Please.
*facepalm*
MafiaSSK, Post 49 wrote:Me.
*OmniFacepalm*
Jazz, Post 50 wrote:Vote: Mafiaplayer

For what should be obvious reasons.
Here I think Jazz's scumdar is out of whack. MP did say something a lil illogical but I dont see it as an SK move. Rather theyre waiting to invest their opinion into a wagon that'll never derail.

---
Pitstop, Post 61 wrote:I thought I would put it out there that I, too, am not in a Mason pair, which surprised me because I thought all Townies were, but maybe I misread?
Xyl, Post 62 wrote:I guess I don't get to kill zwetschenwasser yet this game.

But that's okay,
I found the SK
. We've already established that not all townies are masons; he's trying to act dumb in the hope that an early townie claim will clear him. It won't work.

unvote zwetschenwasser
vote Pitstop
I've just got to say, that bolded line is exactly what made the next few votes happen. I think people have alot of faith in your deduction skills and want to follow in your lead but You're really stretching that single line to justify a vote in my opinion.
Gorrad, Post 63 wrote:Don't you think you're jumping to conclusions a bit there, Xyl? Sure, Pitstop's post doesn't look good, but I think you may be going overboard.
Though it does help and seems very reasonable, I dont think much effort was put into explanation. Flimsy arguement, perhaps wants to preset something to quote incase a lynch occured. WIFOMing in my head, apologies.

---

2 votes for Xyl, from PhilyEc and Pitstop.
PhilyEc, P65 wrote:Basically you're jumpin' the gun too quick here. I thought MafiaPlayer was your second target.
Pitstop, P66 wrote:You're playing this game as if you already know who is who. Like srsly wtf, you vote me for a weak reason and now you assume you know everybody's role?
Both arguements float around the same area. I doubt shes town in all seriousness but then afterwards, RBT, MafiaSSK and qwints all jump onboard the no-room-for-stops-Pitstop-express-wagon.
AceMarksman, Post 75 wrote:THAT"S EVEN WORSE THAN MAKING OUR MASON PAIRS CLAIM! It cuts down on the power pool that the SK has to chose from without giving the town ANY information at all.

-Xyl, jumping the gun, a little? Explain your vote better, it seems rather baseless at the moment.

-Phily, way too early to cast your vote there. Keeping my eye on you.

-Pitstop, your vote is OMGUS, plain and simple. Unvote or my foot vote will make a pitstop in your ass.

-jazz, you aren't making much contribution to this game. All I've seen from you are just "peanut gallery" comments that don't add much. Do you have a case on anyone? Whom do you find most scummy?

-MSSK, do you have any opinions on other players?
Seems like the general pro-town question board.
Was he answered?
If not, did he care?
PhilyEc, Post 76 wrote:The way I see it, Pitstop simply didn't read the rules throughly, Xyl is trying to take advantage of a simple error in logic on her part and using Rule #37 as an excuse to lynch her. I'm not biting though 3 others have already. Best to step back and develop your own individual opinion of her posts first, mine are made.
AceMarksman, Post 77 wrote:everyone in my first three points cast their vote too early. If I had to guess, I would say Xyl's vote is the scummiest.
Ace and Phily both think Xyl is scummiest at that time, but Ace never puts down a vote. I wonder why. (+ SP)

---

Semantics arguement all the way down to the bottom of the page along with Zwet's vote for me and Ace/MafiaP voting for Zwet. I feel loved :)

---
Jazz, Post 103 wrote:MafiaSSK was the third player to purport to believe that all players in the game were in pairs, and in his post #40,
he said that "there has to be one townie with SK". Yet, in his very next post (#49) he said that he is not paired with anyone.
Sorry, but these two posts just
do not reconcile.
How can a player who purports to believe that everyone is paired with another (following the careless play by Phily) then say that he is not aligned with anyone?
One of these statements cannot be true.
Then, in his very next post (#67),
he jumped on the Pitstop wagon
that had started formulating.

More in a while about some of the other goings-on during the day, but that's enough for me to:

Unvote: Mafiaplayer
Vote: MafiaSSK
I think this is the most accurate shot at SK we've had this entire game and I'm seeing a very strong analytical side to Jazz. (Lets hope shes truely with us :P)
I'd feel inclined to vote for Ace or Mafia at this point but the embolded text is why I'd totally agree that MafiaSSK is doing so heavy active lurking. His comments so far dont constitute as much.

---
qwints wrote:PhilyEC, please provide your analysis of events instead of simply recounting what has happened
Done.
kortskorts (14:18:48): haylen wants more porno-related questions
SimplyAwesome64 (14:19:11): :O no it dont!
jdodge1019 (14:20:06): then why do you keep using the blowjob emoticon
SimplyAwesome64 (14:20:19): >.>
User avatar
zwetschenwasser
zwetschenwasser
Doktor der Musik
User avatar
User avatar
zwetschenwasser
Doktor der Musik
Doktor der Musik
Posts: 8722
Joined: December 7, 2008

Post Post #108 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:24 am

Post by zwetschenwasser »

:shock: I like this post by Phily. However, you also claimed to be a newbie trying to fix your play on the last page. This post and that post don't agree.
UW Huskies Class of 2014!
Spontaneous Bastard Mafia II is accepting replacements.
User avatar
AceMarksman
AceMarksman
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
AceMarksman
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1432
Joined: January 23, 2009
Location: The OA

Post Post #109 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 5:34 am

Post by AceMarksman »

Phily wrote:Ace and Phily both think Xyl is scummiest at that time, but Ace never puts down a vote. I wonder why. (+ SP)
His vote was the scummiest of the three, but scummier things have been done by other players.
Show
"either he's scum and yay 1 less scum, or he's town and yay 1 less zwetschenwasser. " ~Moratorium
Words to live by.

My record: W/L/T/A
Overall:5/2/0/1
Town:5/2/0/1
Scum:0/0/0/0
3rd Party:0/0/0/0
User avatar
Xylthixlm
Xylthixlm
!xmafia win
User avatar
User avatar
Xylthixlm
!xmafia win
!xmafia win
Posts: 5414
Joined: July 12, 2006

Post Post #110 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 5:37 am

Post by Xylthixlm »

Why isn't Pitstop dead yet?
#mafia@irc.globalgamers.net

"Xyl was completely berserk" -dramonic
"Xyl's ruthless policy lynching won the game." -Vi
User avatar
zwetschenwasser
zwetschenwasser
Doktor der Musik
User avatar
User avatar
zwetschenwasser
Doktor der Musik
Doktor der Musik
Posts: 8722
Joined: December 7, 2008

Post Post #111 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 5:40 am

Post by zwetschenwasser »

Xylthixlm wrote:Why isn't Pitstop dead yet?
Tunnel-visioning much?
UW Huskies Class of 2014!
Spontaneous Bastard Mafia II is accepting replacements.
User avatar
Xylthixlm
Xylthixlm
!xmafia win
User avatar
User avatar
Xylthixlm
!xmafia win
!xmafia win
Posts: 5414
Joined: July 12, 2006

Post Post #112 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 5:46 am

Post by Xylthixlm »

zwetschenwasser wrote:
Xylthixlm wrote:Why isn't Pitstop dead yet?
Tunnel-visioning much?
Nope.
#mafia@irc.globalgamers.net

"Xyl was completely berserk" -dramonic
"Xyl's ruthless policy lynching won the game." -Vi
User avatar
Xylthixlm
Xylthixlm
!xmafia win
User avatar
User avatar
Xylthixlm
!xmafia win
!xmafia win
Posts: 5414
Joined: July 12, 2006

Post Post #113 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 5:53 am

Post by Xylthixlm »

PhilyEc is clearly town. He's still stuck in the "Mafia is a game of logic" rut a lot of newbies fall into, but he's town.
#mafia@irc.globalgamers.net

"Xyl was completely berserk" -dramonic
"Xyl's ruthless policy lynching won the game." -Vi
User avatar
zwetschenwasser
zwetschenwasser
Doktor der Musik
User avatar
User avatar
zwetschenwasser
Doktor der Musik
Doktor der Musik
Posts: 8722
Joined: December 7, 2008

Post Post #114 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 7:55 am

Post by zwetschenwasser »

Mafia IS a game of logic.
UW Huskies Class of 2014!
Spontaneous Bastard Mafia II is accepting replacements.
User avatar
Xylthixlm
Xylthixlm
!xmafia win
User avatar
User avatar
Xylthixlm
!xmafia win
!xmafia win
Posts: 5414
Joined: July 12, 2006

Post Post #115 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 8:03 am

Post by Xylthixlm »

zwetschenwasser wrote:Mafia IS a game of logic.
Nope. It's a game of psychology and persuasion.
#mafia@irc.globalgamers.net

"Xyl was completely berserk" -dramonic
"Xyl's ruthless policy lynching won the game." -Vi
User avatar
AceMarksman
AceMarksman
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
AceMarksman
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1432
Joined: January 23, 2009
Location: The OA

Post Post #116 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 8:30 am

Post by AceMarksman »

to be persuasive, you need to be logical.
Show
"either he's scum and yay 1 less scum, or he's town and yay 1 less zwetschenwasser. " ~Moratorium
Words to live by.

My record: W/L/T/A
Overall:5/2/0/1
Town:5/2/0/1
Scum:0/0/0/0
3rd Party:0/0/0/0
User avatar
Mafiaplayer
Mafiaplayer
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Mafiaplayer
Goon
Goon
Posts: 233
Joined: January 28, 2008

Post Post #117 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 8:56 am

Post by Mafiaplayer »

unvote, vote:Xyl


Only scum needs to pursuade anyone of anything. What townies say should be true and thus not need pursuasion.
Anyone who would actually play mafia sucsk
User avatar
PhilyEc
PhilyEc
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
PhilyEc
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1550
Joined: February 15, 2009
Location: Dublin
Contact:

Post Post #118 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 9:05 am

Post by PhilyEc »

Xylthixlm wrote:
zwetschenwasser wrote:Mafia IS a game of logic.
Nope. It's a game of psychology and persuasion.
You are correct sir, logic has to be there for the rest of the towns sanity though. Consider it an act of empathy.
kortskorts (14:18:48): haylen wants more porno-related questions
SimplyAwesome64 (14:19:11): :O no it dont!
jdodge1019 (14:20:06): then why do you keep using the blowjob emoticon
SimplyAwesome64 (14:20:19): >.>
User avatar
AceMarksman
AceMarksman
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
AceMarksman
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1432
Joined: January 23, 2009
Location: The OA

Post Post #119 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 9:18 am

Post by AceMarksman »

The town needs to be persuasive in order to win. Mafia, your vote is stupid.
Show
"either he's scum and yay 1 less scum, or he's town and yay 1 less zwetschenwasser. " ~Moratorium
Words to live by.

My record: W/L/T/A
Overall:5/2/0/1
Town:5/2/0/1
Scum:0/0/0/0
3rd Party:0/0/0/0
User avatar
Jazzmyn
Jazzmyn
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Jazzmyn
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1582
Joined: August 31, 2008

Post Post #120 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 9:31 am

Post by Jazzmyn »

Qanqan wrote:Those are good points about MafiaSSK, but Zwets vote seems like a vote with completely hollow logic, so I wouldn't mind hearing a defence (from both) because I can't decide who to vote. :(
You'll find that most of zwet's votes are hollow. But I agree that anyone being accused, provided that there are specific and articulated reasons for the accusation, should offer a defence.
qwints wrote:I don't think the "contradiction" by MafiaSSK is damning, but I'll leave it to him to provide an explanation for it.
You should, indeed, leave it for him to provide an explanation, and I hope he does.
PhilyEc wrote:Jazz, how sure are you Mafiaplayer is ze SK? (Percentage wise)
I don't do percentages, Phily. I analyze what people write, hunt for things that look scummy, and analyze the explanations that the person offers for them, and then make up my mind as to whether or not I believe the explanations.

Phily's 107 = obv town.
AceMarksman wrote:The town needs to be persuasive in order to win. Mafia, your vote is stupid.
Agreed. Zwet's vote on Phily is also stupid.

Regards,
Jazz
User avatar
PhilyEc
PhilyEc
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
PhilyEc
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1550
Joined: February 15, 2009
Location: Dublin
Contact:

Post Post #121 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 9:43 am

Post by PhilyEc »

I'm suprised no one has any big issues with my post, usually I'm off the ball (or so I'm told).
Ace wrote:His vote was the scummiest of the three, but scummier things have been done by other players.
Which players? What exactly did they do that you think is scummier?
kortskorts (14:18:48): haylen wants more porno-related questions
SimplyAwesome64 (14:19:11): :O no it dont!
jdodge1019 (14:20:06): then why do you keep using the blowjob emoticon
SimplyAwesome64 (14:20:19): >.>
User avatar
AceMarksman
AceMarksman
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
AceMarksman
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1432
Joined: January 23, 2009
Location: The OA

Post Post #122 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 9:50 am

Post by AceMarksman »

qwints-attempted the mass claim thing after everyone had decided that it was a horrid idea, and hasn't said much since.

zwet- do I even need to go into it?
Show
"either he's scum and yay 1 less scum, or he's town and yay 1 less zwetschenwasser. " ~Moratorium
Words to live by.

My record: W/L/T/A
Overall:5/2/0/1
Town:5/2/0/1
Scum:0/0/0/0
3rd Party:0/0/0/0
User avatar
PhilyEc
PhilyEc
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
PhilyEc
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1550
Joined: February 15, 2009
Location: Dublin
Contact:

Post Post #123 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 9:54 am

Post by PhilyEc »

Zwet, because he hasn't contributed?
kortskorts (14:18:48): haylen wants more porno-related questions
SimplyAwesome64 (14:19:11): :O no it dont!
jdodge1019 (14:20:06): then why do you keep using the blowjob emoticon
SimplyAwesome64 (14:20:19): >.>
User avatar
qwints
qwints
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
qwints
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3303
Joined: September 5, 2008

Post Post #124 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 10:24 am

Post by qwints »

AceMarksman wrote:qwints-attempted the mass claim thing after everyone had decided that it was a horrid idea, and hasn't said much since.
No, I was the one who first suggested the idea. Then there was discussion of it in which I participated where most were against. After it was pointed out that masons could always wait to claim, I admitted it was a bad idea.
Compare that to mafiaplayer's demand that anyone not a mason should claim immediately.

Phily, I admit that I reversed myself on the mass claim plan, but the post you pointed out was not where I did so. I was saying masons should say "I'm a mason." but not their roles (e.g. I'm a cop) or their partners ( i.e. I'm masons with x).

Mafiaplayer, are you seriously suggesting that trying to persuade others is a scum tell?
Locked