Nuwen (2) <-~ hp [leaves], q21
AceMarksman (1) <-~ springlullaby
Lawrencelot (1) <-~ Claus
q21 (1) <-~ AceMarksman
Not voting (1) <-~ Lawrencelot
Deadline (2 more weeks) wrote:
Deadline (2 more weeks) wrote:
For serious? This kinda make me want to revote q21 because it looks like scum panic. 5 pages, there is litterally nothing to catch up on!q21 wrote:I'm starting to get pretty far behind in this game and won't have much time for the foreseeable future. As much as I hate to do this its probably for the better if I'm replaced.
Mod, please replace me
I'm scum because I have a town read on you? How exactly does that work? As for naming names of who I think is scum, I think this quote speaks for it's self:spring wrote:My vote stays on Ace for now: the scumslip is the fact that he seems to be considering me to be town whereas he can't know were he town. Plus I don't understand what he doesn't understand in my asking him to name names in whom he thinks is scum, and whom he thinks is town.
Newsflash: The people I vote and FoS are the people I think are scum.Ace wrote:Vote: ABR
FoS: Claus
Ace used plural pronouns such as "we" and "us" when he expressed an earlier opinion that the town was cannibalizing itself while scum lurked through the debate; I don't think his opinion that Spring is town constitutes a slip of known information. In fact, I find Spring's emerging pattern of contrived case material a bit disconcerting.springlullaby wrote:I'm trying to evaluate how likely it is for this to be awkwardness/newbishness because, well, I kinda expect scum to be better than that.AceMarksman wrote:spring, I don't think you understand my position. I meant that if we carry on with this argument amongst ourselvs, then scum will start to lurk and let us kill each other. I'm starting to notice patterns of lurking from q21 and hp, so they are at the top of my suspect list at the moment. I would say q21 is more scummy than hp, because q21 started this entire argument in the first place. So,Unvote, vote:q21
But bottom line is, it's one hell of a scumslip. So yeah, my vote is probably sticking, short of scum claiming scum.
(ABR, Claus, Lawrence, and Spring enter the foray)AceMarksman wrote:I can't help but feel that this argument is between two players of the same alignment, either both scum or both town. I'm thinking both town atm.
So it isn't a great stretch to believe that the quote Spring calls a "slip" is a continuance of the above:AceMarksman wrote:What started as a theory discussion has turned into a heated argument. I don't like the feeling I'm getting from all of this. I think scum lurking at the moment, trying to get us to kill each other off.
What I find anti-town about AceAceMarksman wrote:spring, I don't think you understand my position. I meant that ifwe carry on with this argument amongst ourselvs, then scum will start to lurk and let us kill each other. I'm starting to notice patterns of lurking from q21 and hp, so they are at the top of my suspect list at the moment. I would say q21 is more scummy than hp, because q21 started this entire argument in the first place. So,Unvote, vote:q21
AceMarksman wrote: As for town-seeming players: you and newen are playing a good town game, and ekiM hasn't given me anything to complain about. hp [leaves] is slightly scummy for his cronic lurking, law is leaning scum at the moment.
This is the item standing out to me from Lawrence. Disagreement, especially about theory (or how useful theory is, which ironically constitutes a theory discussion unto itself) is not a reliable scum tell. I understand that Lawrence's reads are primarily gut-based and there might be currently-unknown reasons for his suspicions besides patent disagreement.Lawrencelot wrote: What I do find scummy is q21, Claus, and Ace's behaviour.q21 mostly because I disagree with everything he says, Claus for his first reaction to 'theory discussion' and his latest post, though in both these players I might be biased, I'm not going to vote anyone just because I think they're wrong.
Lol, no. There was nothing in what q21 said that made me suspect he replaced out of more than 1 game, so I didn't even think of verifying. However, I didn't bother voting him either because if replacing out tend to make people look scummy, it is generally a crapshoot call at best.Nuwen wrote: Q21 is replacing out of games en masse. Framing his replacement request as panic or a tactical withdrawal is suspect - I think a town player would have made the effort to click his recent posts to confirm that Q21 is replacing out of this game exclusively. Rather than eliminate all possibilities, however, Spring latched on to the most convenient scummy explanation.