Okay, I'll bite. I'll boost every 6th person:
Boost:Cateraction
Boost:Sajin
Yea. i fail 2 see how--scum want the game 2 get started as much as town do.KMD wrote:You are seriously asking me why it's protown to get out of the RVS?
So? Scum want that, 2.Well, it starts the actual game.
Scum want that as well. No point in playing, otherwise.It gets real discussion going.
If we didn't, we might as well just slit our own wrists and let the mafia win.We can start to scumhunt.
Again, scum don't want 2 play that way. It'd be an empty victory.And if we never did it, we'd be jokelynching which is something we wouldn't want.
Again, i still fail 2 see y scum would NOT want us out of the RVS any more than town would.So yeah. It's protown to get out of the RVS.
i fail 2 see the difference--it has the same outcome.Note that I am not saying it's protown to do something weird and say "K, now we're out of the RVS" or to do something scummy to "get reactions" to get us out of the RVS.
Like lurking, voting no lynch, etc.The best way to get out of the RVS is to draw attention to a serious point.
No, i did it 2 get us out of the RVS.Basically, my issue is that you did something just to appear protown
Duh. i went out of my way to make sure ppl knew i was trying to kill the RVS. It's a null tell; y make so much of it?and you went out of your way to make sure we knew you were doing it.
1: Rolefishing. "townie" is a role."Oh, I'm an honest townie. I just want to play the game."
Bcause i'm a jester.Um...what?
Why would you WANT to look bad..
Eh, no longer necessary 2 look bad. Mission accomplished; now i defend myself.And if that's the case, why are you defending yourself so much?
Reactions, of course.Why ARE you witholding it?
Refresh my memory and show me where it says this in Boost 1. i thought many had more than one shot 2 start out with. :/Zito wrote:So in Boost 1, the town power roles and the mafia would start out with a one-shot power.
If he answers my concerns, then he's no longer suspicious.KMD wrote:Are you saying that whatever Semi says, you'll be ok with his answers?
I was already voting him. I find /confirm votes stupid.
They seem pro-town. Y else?Sajin wrote:M- Care to explain why your boosting who you are?
Yet u were online 4 HOURS and STILL failed 2 comment.@ConsonantM
I didn't answer your lurking accusations because they were already addressed and I thought the accusation was baseless to begin with. I am in seven games (six as of a couple hours ago). Not every time I am logged into the site am I able to update in every game.
Scum would absolutely love it if the game wasn't serious yet and there was a deadline in 2 days. They'd also love it if there was a lynch in the RVS that didn't implicate them. Do you disagree?Consume wrote:Yea. i fail 2 see how--scum want the game 2 get started as much as town do.
Meh. Depends on playstyle. Players like myself like to control a game as scum, so scumhunting being around doesn't threaten them. Some players go through the game being worried about being suspected. Those players don't like to see a lot of scumhunting. But still, most scum would love it if a lynch happened without any real scumhunting going on.M wrote:If we didn't, we might as well just slit our own wrists and let the mafia win.
Starting to scum hunt isn't pro-town. It's a null tell; scum want it as well, 4 y play in a game where nobody is trying 2 win?
Play to win. Breaking a setup as town isn't an empty victory, is it?ConsM wrote:Again, scum don't want 2 play that way. It'd be an empty victory.
Yeah, if someone does that, you lay a serious vote, wait for their defense, discuss it, guage everyone else's reactions, and you have a mafia game.ConsM wrote:Like lurking, voting no lynch, etc.
They can b seen as a serious point.
>.<ConsM wrote:1: Rolefishing. "townie" is a role.
Hmm. Ok. I read "answers" as "responds to". Misinterpreted it I guess.ConsM wrote:If he answers my concerns, then he's no longer suspicious.
If he answers it, but I still have concern over him, then Mufasa will be spared until i am no longer concerned about Semi.
Don't see the problem with that.
Answering a post, even all of the points in it != answering concern.
Yeah, I can see how that can create problems.semioldguy wrote:No, editing your posts is against the rules in any game on this site.Wiirdo wrote:NOTE: Also, am I able to edit a post, as it's much easier than waiting for someone to reply and then post.
No. I wouldn't have said a thing if you said "X, Y, and Z are protown" and boosted them. I may have asked "Why is Y protown?" or something, but it wouldn't have looked bad.Wiirdo wrote:I'm not worried, it's just that if I do anything now it's questioned, so I might as well do things fair and square. Are you saying you wouldn't have said the same thing if I boosted three players of my choice?
NOTE: Also, am I able to edit a post, as it's much easier than waiting for someone to reply and then post.
I think he said in another game once that any quote that doesn't have a name is the same person as the last named quote.Wiirdo wrote: Also, ConsonantM, your posts are very hard to read right now the way they're formatted. I can't tell who you're quoting.
They didn't all work this way, but most worked like this or something similar.Patrick in Boost 1 wrote:Doctor wrote: You start the game with a sprig of a very rare herb, which has extraordinary healing powers. Once during the game, at night, you may choose another player; they will be immune to all nightkills that night.
You win when all anti-town roles are eliminated.
Note: turns into full doctor if boosted. If boosted twice, he can also self protect once.
Vigilante wrote: You begin this game with a gun and one bullet. You may use it on another player during the night, if you so wish.
You win when all anti-town roles are eliminated.
Note: Becomes a full vig when boosted. If boosted twice, he is unightkillable on any night when he doesn't kill.
I wasn't sitting online for four consecutive hours. I was on and off the computer for most of last night as I was doing other things too like showering, walking to Ralphs to buy groceries, cooking and eating dinner.ConsonantM wrote:Yet u were online 4 HOURS and STILL failed 2 comment.
THAT seemed like lurking 2 me.
Not an adequate response; i still have concerns over Semi.
Yes.KMD wrote:Scum would absolutely love it if the game wasn't serious yet and there was a deadline in 2 days. They'd also love it if there was a lynch in the RVS that didn't implicate them. Do you disagree?