At the moment, apart from Haylen, CSL, ortolan, RBT, Zazier, and Zoraster all qualify as lurkers by dint of postcount alone.Porochaz wrote:Who else is on yourhitlist?lurker list?
However, I am more impressed by Zoraster than the others since he has some questions in his last post. I guess ortolan has a question in his last post, also, but it doesn't seem to have led to anything.
Well, in the absence of an ability to vote for all of them at once...forbiddanlight wrote:This is different from all the other players how?It is on Haylen. It was originally a random vote, but she is one of those who I see as not doing a whole lot for the game at the moment. Her last post shows signs of her contribution picking up, but not enough yet.
I find it ironic that you first attacked me for active lurking, when what I have been doing myself is trying to find active lurkers. Take, for example, Riceballtail; in his second post, he unvoted and appeared perfectly happy to let matters rest there. (Indeed, he basically has.) That's not content either, and I went after him for it.Pomegranate wrote:But that's not content- I could check up how many times someone posted by myself quite easily. That's not content.
I'm not sure where you got the idea of postcounts from. I have been quite clear about what I was doing:
julienvonwolfe wrote:It's not the postcount that I was looking at, really - more the fact that you unvoted and appeared content to leave matters there for the moment, with no further attempt at scumhunting.