Alright, enough RVS, down to business...
Let's see what we've got so far... Page 1: RVS, nothing really much to be learned here; page 2, MMM quick-wagon, some votes from people thinking he thinks it's a bastard game, some omgus votes for HP-hating... nothing really solid or sticky presented against anyone here, so, moving along... page 3 is a bunch of fluff about humor meters, more links from MMM, facepalm pictures, talking about other games, and img tag fail. Oh wait, what's this? A few posts more about bastard moddery by IH and farside (65 and 66), a few more fluff posts, and then a soft accusation in 74 by sudo_nym, against the sillymongers. I tend to agree with sudo about innately suspecting chronic fluffers, but this early it's pretty much a null tell, as some players are still barely out of RVS at this point, and others are refusing to let it go without a few last jabs.
But page 4 starts off with a bang as farside attacks sudo_nym's last post on page 3, and the game begins.
Up until this point, I had been impressed with the activity level of the players, but not so much with the amount of actual content. Now we're getting somewhere though! ^_^ - anyway, farside's 79 has some good scum-hunting tips and some personal opinions on who's scummy, and I totally agree with NS's 81 where it says "I was happy with the activity level in the beginning. Let's not fall asleep here, people.", but not so much where it says he thinks IH is being opportunistic.
Something tells me NS is probably just more sensitive here cause IH's 'opportunistic' vote was on him. He's probably overthinking again (like in post 37); because he'd likely not have even noticed IH's vote was for anyone besides him. But there may be some validity yet to NS's observation. Time'll tell, they say.
@ fuzzy 82: Isn't the point of a bastard game to be a bastard? I would definitely classify 'not telling people it's a bastard game' as a pretty bastardly move.
lol I'm just being contentious. I don't think its a bastard game either.
Care to clue us in, mod, so we can cease this folly?
@ farside vs sudo: sudo's 83 seems a bit too over-defensive and over-critical imo, but there are some valid points in it.
@ fakegod 86: fluff moar plz
@ Seraphim 94: "Oho, Sudo and farside fight. Based on my meta of farside, Sudo is the hypothetical loser but I'll see how it plays out first." -- LOL!
@ Kmd4390: welcome.
@ most of page 5: Dumbledore's beard! people already going V/LA on us? and TWO REPLACEMENTS?! um. LAME.
@ sudo: what is your opinion of fakegod?
@ fakegod: what is your opinion of sudo?
