Mafiascum.net

↑ Xegarus wrote:....Its still on?
Woops.

I planned to unvote during the 'I voted for you for Y' post I made.
I should stop using my phone.

UNVOTE:
I was going to say that my reason for voting was his hastiness but as time has gone by, the less I actually believe it my self.

Not going to place it on anyone?

Any thoughts on Doc?

↑ TheDoctor wrote:I had read, and read the responses to his RC. He did something dumb, and he was getting grilled for it, but I did not see any reason to add to a lynch mob mentality. I was sitting out to see if I saw anything worth pointing out. I'm not a big fan of repeating things others have said, but I guess I will be forced to do so on this site.

Never asked you to repeat what others have said; I am asking you to take your own position on a situation. Do you think the claim was more likely to come from a scum viewpoint, or a town viewpoint? Why?

↑ Nachomamma8 wrote:

↑ TheDoctor wrote:I had read, and read the responses to his RC. He did something dumb, and he was getting grilled for it, but I did not see any reason to add to a lynch mob mentality. I was sitting out to see if I saw anything worth pointing out. I'm not a big fan of repeating things others have said, but I guess I will be forced to do so on this site.

Never asked you to repeat what others have said; I am asking you to take your own position on a situation. Do you think the claim was more likely to come from a scum viewpoint, or a town viewpoint? Why?

It could come from either. It's a bad play either way.

Could you possibly be a little more non committal, Doc? Thanks.

↑ Om wrote:

↑ Xegarus wrote:....Its still on?
Woops.

I planned to unvote during the 'I voted for you for Y' post I made.
I should stop using my phone.

UNVOTE:
I was going to say that my reason for voting was his hastiness but as time has gone by, the less I actually believe it my self.

Not going to place it on anyone?

Any thoughts on Doc?

Not as of this moment, no.

I understand why people have voted for Doc so far. He didn't comment on my RC when it was discussed and later he appeared to be playing it safe by 'sitting on the fence' as some of you have but it. (If i missed something out, let me know.)

I can see how all that can look pretty scummy.
But i feel Smash looks a bit scummy too by bringing up discussions that were settled very early on.
At this point in time they both seem viable but i can't pick one over the other. I would have to see how things go between these two before i can really make a desicion. I'm not going to vote based on guts alone. Thats the least likely excuse for me cause i'm just not comfortable with it.

Could i ask what CF's reason for picking Smash over Doc was?

↑ Dyrynify wrote:Could you possibly be a little more non committal, Doc? Thanks.

Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't realize I had to commit to anything. Let me fix that. I don't have a fucking clue if he is town or not.

↑ TheDoctor wrote:

↑ Dyrynify wrote:Could you possibly be a little more non committal, Doc? Thanks.

Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't realize I had to commit to anything. Let me fix that. I don't have a fucking clue if he is town or not.

No need to get so aggressive about it.

It doesn't matter just vote Smash.

↑ CF Riot wrote:It doesn't matter just vote Smash.

-_-

...


Why?

Never happening, CF. I wont vote someone just because I am told to.

It obviously wasn't settled by the time of my comments because xegar was still truong to argue that scum wouldn't know if he was lying or not. So trying to sweep an important topic under the rug when it's only page 5 is real scummy to me why would cf riot be pushing a, lynch on me beyond trying to shut down discussion? It doesn't look good for riot or xegar at all. Especially since xegar is sheeping riot s point that, this was settled on page 2. could one or both be getting nervous? hmm.,

Question about rolecops.
When do they get the information about their target?
Say if a scumcop chooses X as their role target. Would he be given his role and then still be allowed to kill him during the same night?
Or would he be given the information at a later time?

Same night, unless I am completely mistaken.

@Xeg: Seriously. Just vote him.

@Dyr: Wasn't talking to you.

@Smashbard: You goose, it doesn't matter. He claimed, we told him doing that is bad, it's over. It doesn't matter if he's realized we're right or not, the point is this is all theory talk and none of it has anything to do with who is scum. I'm not sweeping an important topic under the rug, this is not an important topic. Lynching you isn't shutting down discussion, it's shutting down noise which has no baring on the game.

pedit: All night actions go through during night, usually according to this thing we have called Natural Action Resolution which you can look up on the wiki. You can't "do" one night action then "do" the other on the same night. The mafia would just submit a cop and a kill then when night was over they'd see the results of both.

@Smash

Why would CF get nervous over something so shitty, considering his experience?
There's no scum motivation for pushing that limportant topic' underneath the rug as it's completely null.

VOTE: Smash

@CF

Are you trying to policy lynch Smash?

So, Xeg, tell me; Why are you obeying orders from someone you have never met?

And CF, if you are not scumbuddies with Xeg, why the hell are you playing on the inexperience of a newbie to push your lynch?

I don't policy lynch anyone ever. Policy lynches are mostly dumb, imo.

So, Dyr, tell me; Why are you trying to call my post an order?

Im not obeying orders, i'm interrogating possible scum.

↑ CF Riot wrote:Lynching you isn't shutting down discussion, it's shutting down noise which has no baring on the game.

This makes it seem like you are policy lynching.

Em+, Why are still on me?
You said

↑ em+p_dear wrote:Although, does somebody have to get lynched everyday? Because if not, I may want to retract my vote.

We've now discussed that we don't need a lynch everyday but it would be a disadvantage to us if we didn't.
Do you have a reason to stay on me?

@CF
Could you sum up briefly why smash is scum?

I think the reason Bard continues to post noise is because he's scum looking for something safe to talk about. Why did you think he was scummy?

I have a reason for voting. But i'll be explaining it later.

↑ CF Riot wrote:@Xeg: Seriously. Just vote him.

Sorry, it just looks a whole hell of a lot like you told him what to do, which...

↑ Xegarus wrote:VOTE: Smash

...he then proceded to do, almost as if you and he have some sort of agreement.

Now, Xeg has not really been on the site long enough to have been in another game, so why else is he so buddy-buddy with you? I can think of one reason. Lets take a look here;

↑ CF Riot wrote:It doesn't matter just vote Smash.

↑ Xegarus wrote:Why?

↑ CF Riot wrote:@Xeg: Seriously. Just vote him

↑ Xegarus wrote:VOTE: Smash

Wow, it certainly looks like you are ordering him around. Almost the way a more experienced scum will lead a newbie scum.

So tell me, Xeg, what is your reason? Cause this seems to indicate you had none until told to vote.