Mafiascum.net

In post 66, PhDScar wrote:

In post 65, Majiffy wrote:

In post 38, Does Bo Know wrote:Hey Majiffy, any particular reason for voting PhDScar?

Cuz he has a scum role PM. Vote him with me.

... What the hell kind of logic is that?! First of all I don't have a PM saying I'm playing scum. Secondly if I did how the fuck would you know? You can't see my Pm's.

Here's that really bad reaction. Also it clearly shows he's afraid I'm going to come at him with a legitimate case.

Hint: his fear is well-placed. I'll put together a comprehensive step-by-step "why we should be lynching PhD" case either tomorrow night or the weekend.

We're trying to get answers lynch scum Majiffy.

PEdit: Don't see anything wrong with that reaction. I feel a newbscum reaction to Majiffy would've been a more polite, considering how polite he's been so far.

The step-by-step? , let's listen to that.

Looks very caught-scum to me.

And ok. Give me till tomorrow night or something. I have to study chip stack values...

Alright, then i wont vote until i see said case or i find someone scummy then

In post 65, Majiffy wrote: Cuz he has a scum role PM. Vote him with me.

I don't find PhD's reaction to the quote above scummy, nor bad. I'm fairly certain that most players would react in quite a similar way.

But in addition, you encourage DBK to vote PhD with you, and that just screams "hey, I'm scum and I'm trying to push for a mislynch" to me. Why are you so certain that PhD is scum and why wouldn't you at least give a reason for it?

I'm going to place my vote on Majiffy until I see the step-by-step guide, because I don't see why any town player would say anything like that.

UNVOTE: whoever I had my vote on
VOTE: Majiffy

Also, I'd like to see some more interaction from ArcAngel and Patzer. I'm going to ask this to both of you: who do you find suspicious and why?

I must be triple posting now, but anyway:

I'm a bit interested in the times zones you live in. Everyone posts when I'm asleep, it seems.

CST.

GMT/UTC -5 (not sure what that equals to)

I'm actually really excited to read what Majiffy has to say. Not only will it get this game going but it will teach me a lot about this game. A lot of pressure though, the quality of his post and the quality of my rebuttal seems like it will decided which one of the two of us will get lynched.

You know what? I've haven't played a lot of forum mafia, but I've played enough on other sites to know one thing.

The person that is the scummiest D1 is never mafia. Have you all realized that?
I don't think in any game I have played, town lynched correctly, and I've played my fair share of them.

But that's stupid meta anyway.

And I am PST.

Votecount request.

I'll reread the thread and post my thoughts soon.
I'm in British Summer Time (UTC+1), but I'm often awake in the middle of the night (as you can see)

In post 109, PhDScar wrote:I'm actually really excited to read what Majiffy has to say.

Tonight... you.

In post 110, TMTOLBTWNTOF wrote:You know what? I've haven't played a lot of forum mafia, but I've played enough on other sites to know one thing.

The person that is the scummiest D1 is never mafia. Have you all realized that?

No. Because I've led lynches on scum d1 plenty of times.

EST.

Back in a few hours.

Uct +1 here, Netherlands

In post 31, PhDScar wrote:I think the "Lynching All Liars" could be safest thing to do. So i agree with that. I don't agree with "Lynching All Lurkers" because you never know what the reason is. Maybe they have computer issues or a real life emergency.

In post 53, PhDScar wrote:Okay I actually sort of agree with your opinion. I wasn't saying that was my opinion it was just how it seemed all the players in this were leaning.

These posts contradict each other.
at the moment PhD looks like the most likely scum.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: PhDScar

In post 114, patzer wrote:

In post 31, PhDScar wrote:I think the "Lynching All Liars" could be safest thing to do. So i agree with that. I don't agree with "Lynching All Lurkers" because you never know what the reason is. Maybe they have computer issues or a real life emergency.

In post 53, PhDScar wrote:Okay I actually sort of agree with your opinion. I wasn't saying that was my opinion it was just how it seemed all the players in this were leaning.

These posts contradict each other.
at the moment PhD looks like the most likely scum.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: PhDScar

Sorry for the confusion all I was trying to say is that what he wrote was well written and made me rethink my opinion. Also it isn't very far how you those quotes out of context. So I ask anyone whom read this to go back to when I said the first quote and read up to last it should fill in some gaps.

In post 24, PhDScar wrote:Hello.

Wow a lot of votes without anyone actually doing anything that's... unfair. I guess I'll do the same.

I'm not voting for Does Bo Know because I love Scrubs and not Majiffy because he made me laugh.

I do agree with Patzer so I too shall vote for TMTOLBTWNTOF for having one of the stupidest usernames I have ever seen in all my years of using the internet.

VOTE: TMTOLBTWBTOF

Bolded:
Underlined: Buddying.
Italicized: Trying to add credence to an RVS vote.

In post 27, PhDScar wrote:Are you trying to defend your name? Not working I hate Mel Gibson.

Subtle push on the wagon while still playing it off as RVS/joke.

In post 29, PhDScar wrote:Not really it's just that I was the only who hadn't voted so I went with any reason I could think of to cast a vote.

Not a town mindset. Why so worried about fitting in?

More buddying in 31, 32. Not worth quoting.

----

That covers my original vote. The following are poor reactions since my vote that have reinforced my believe that PhD is scum.

----

48 is a possible testing-of-the-waters to find out what he could feasibly get away with pushing.
49 and 50 bear no mention of my very serious vote on PhD.
66 (as I've brought up) is a caught-scum reaction when presented with no case they can defend against. I draw particular attention to the last two sentences and the facepalm emoticon. This is not a town mindset.
78 appears to be trying to play off a wagon as "no big deal". Also mentions that he's 'ready to do a serious vote'... Where is it?
82 "I haven't discovered anything"... Then why were you 'ready to do a serious vote' if you had no serious target?

----

So vote PhD.
Also don't like anorway's 102/"reasons for voting Majiffy". The entire thing is just weak and possibly chainsaw'y, but I can't imagine a buddy of caught scum would blatantly chainsaw d1.

In post 116, Majiffy wrote:

In post 24, PhDScar wrote:Hello.

Wow a lot of votes without anyone actually doing anything that's... unfair. I guess I'll do the same.

I'm not voting for Does Bo Know because I love Scrubs and not Majiffy because he made me laugh.

I do agree with Patzer so I too shall vote for TMTOLBTWNTOF for having one of the stupidest usernames I have ever seen in all my years of using the internet.

VOTE: TMTOLBTWBTOF

Bolded:

What?

Underlined: Buddying.
Italicized: Trying to add credence to an RVS vote.

In post 27, PhDScar wrote:Are you trying to defend your name? Not working I hate Mel Gibson.

Subtle push on the wagon while still playing it off as RVS/joke.

In post 29, PhDScar wrote:Not really it's just that I was the only who hadn't voted so I went with any reason I could think of to cast a vote.

Not a town mindset. Why so worried about fitting in?

More buddying in 31, 32. Not worth quoting.

----

That covers my original vote. The following are poor reactions since my vote that have reinforced my believe that PhD is scum.

----

48 is a possible testing-of-the-waters to find out what he could feasibly get away with pushing.
49 and 50 bear no mention of my very serious vote on PhD.
66 (as I've brought up) is a caught-scum reaction when presented with no case they can defend against. I draw particular attention to the last two sentences and the facepalm emoticon. This is not a town mindset.
78 appears to be trying to play off a wagon as "no big deal". Also mentions that he's 'ready to do a serious vote'... Where is it?
82 "I haven't discovered anything"... Then why were you 'ready to do a serious vote' if you had no serious target?

----

So vote PhD.
Also don't like anorway's 102/"reasons for voting Majiffy". The entire thing is just weak and possibly chainsaw'y, but I can't imagine a buddy of caught scum would blatantly chainsaw d1.

Going to be honest I have hard time defending from this. Most of my answers to what Majiffy said are "noob screw ups". Also to the "also mentions he's ready to do a serious vote" bit, I wrote many times it had nothing to do with me thinking of any just me saying for me RVS is over.

Had nothing to do with me thinking of *anyone just me saying for me RVS is over.

If RVS is over for you, specifically you, that means that you should have someone in mind to place a vote on. Furthermore, you've called (I think 2?) players scum, and have as of yet declined to lay a vote on either. Why?

People kept asking who I was thinking of (despite me making a few posts saying I didn't have anyone) so to get people off my back I forced out a few weak reason to suspect people. The reasons were so weak I didn't vote for those people. See what I mean, most of your issues with me are because I made stupid noob mistakes. I really hope this clears up a few things I really am town and I don’t want my first game to end like this.

Ooohhhhh, the "they're all noob mistakes" defense doesn't help...

I don't know, I don't really see the case on PhDScar but that's because I'm only looking at Majiffy's post about it, not going back to previous posts. I'm on my phone, may get more into it tomorrow.

...this is not going to end well.

You should probably stop doing that, PhD.

Talking or just being an idiot all around?