Mafiascum.net

In post 69, morph the cat wrote:borktown.

I'm cabd and I approve this fferypost 120%

In post 90, TheIrishPope wrote:@Natirasha, if I must be, I shall. I agree with your spirited Town sentiment, but you say it as if you are not part of the Town.

Hi.

Let me break down for y'all why this post sucks absolute ass. Putting aside the extremely forced and stilted way the post is written, the actual substance of it is the kind of lazy perspective-slip type of comment scum like to make because it's something easy to grab it and requires no actual insight whatsoever. It reminds me of the substanceless attacks I used to make way back when I was new and even worse at scum than I am now.

I could write long masturbatory walls that no one will ever read about the rest of his posts being full of vapid pro-town posturing (the bit about us not signing our posts made me laugh) but I'm still reeling from the effects of the Bar exam. Bug me about it tomorrow if you really want it but it should be self evident from his posts.

I hope you enjoyed my amazing and scintillating insight into this game!

(Also, agree with borktown.)

Well my first impressions are that I do believe Natarashi is fairly new to this and that he is a town just trying to get someone to give a helping hand. While silly the way he did it, it doesn't really look scummy to me.

You though Pope I don't know about you yet.

In post 58, TheIrishPope wrote:Now, you see, I have found that people are scum when they:
Refuse to answer harmless RQS questions from the beginning, or
Quit when the questions start getting serious.
This quite gives me a slight Town read on Purpkin at best, although, I do need to see Mara posting.
Meta doesn't work. I'm changing my play.

Do not make sweeping generalisations of my play.

/

Couldn't you just say that and then be scum anyways. You could answer questions all day but still be scum, but if what you say is true what is your read out so far in this game? Answer me that.

Lady is another person that has stuck out for me as well so far. Not bad though. I think. Aggressive and forth right as well. She is making herself look towny out to get shit done. and I'm willing to believe that.

Also, TIP:

In post 81, TheIrishPope wrote:Empire is a more laid back player, anyway. I am not worried about him.

This post clearly suggests you have knowledge of my play, so...?

Who or what is Bork?

In post 104, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Who or what is Bork?

The half of the Purpkin hydra that's (I'm assuming) has written all the posts so far.

In post 74, Lady Lambdadelta wrote: Why are you scared of her and not scared of Empire or me? I'm just as scary as she is.

Also, do you think buddying is a pro-town way to behave?

In post 81, TheIrishPope wrote:Silly Lady thinks she's scary. Empire is a more laid back player, anyway. I am not worried about him. I consider Natirasha a newbie since he just returned from a hiatus.
Catch up, kiddo.

Buddying can be pro-Town in many situations. You're just thinking too conventionally.

I see these two posts in logical order. Why do you think they are not?
@Purpkin, how convenient. Sweet dreams!
@morph the cat, sup. I want to hear more from you.
@Jabberwock, finally, the reaction I wanted. "Masturbatory walls" sealed the deal for me. I wouldn't say "knowledge". I'd say it's more of an overview. Do you not agree? How would you define your play style?
@Daemon, I don't understand the question. Also, don't fall into the "sticking out = Town" play. I've used it as scum. It worked.
@Lady, Bork is one half of Purpkin. Also, chill a bit.

[quote="In post 105, Jabberwock"][/quote]

Oh. Kay. Not saying I don't agree, but any particular reason why you're confident in that?

What the fuck...

In post 102, Daemon385 wrote:Natarashi

I really need to get a gallery of the ways my name's been mispelled.

In post 97, TheIrishPope wrote:I do not have any "Empire knowledge" as you so claim; could you elaborate on that?

"As you so claim"?

In post 81, TheIrishPope wrote:Empire is a more laid back player, anyway. I am not worried about him.

Why are you lying about meta knowledge? Explaining it away as an "overview" is crap, and you're now attempting to dodge the question by kicking the responsibility of describing Empire's playstyle away from you.

In post 97, TheIrishPope wrote:@Jabberwock, "many occasions" is an ambiguous term, don't you think? Let us say "several" times, as it feels like a compromise to me. I agree that Skype play is most definitely not the same as forum play but forum play reflects onto Skype play. Buddying Tierce is wonderful to me. Why does it bother you?

[...]

It's nice to say "Post X is horrible" without giving reason, but I don't see the Town motivation behind it. How are you helping us, Jabberwock?

*rests chin on claws*

The mix between buddying and attempts at mudslinging is really cute. Do keep going.

In post 107, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 105, Jabberwock wrote:The half of the Purpkin hydra that's (I'm assuming) has written all the posts so far.

Oh. Kay. Not saying I don't agree, but any particular reason why you're confident in that?

Several. But do explain why , of all people, want Townreads explained.

In post 111, Jabberwock wrote:

In post 107, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 105, Jabberwock wrote:The half of the Purpkin hydra that's (I'm assuming) has written all the posts so far.

Oh. Kay. Not saying I don't agree, but any particular reason why you're confident in that?

Several. But do explain why

you

, of all people, want Townreads explained.

Perfect, thanks Empire! That's all I needed.

In post 112, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 111, Jabberwock wrote:

In post 107, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 105, Jabberwock wrote:The half of the Purpkin hydra that's (I'm assuming) has written all the posts so far.

Oh. Kay. Not saying I don't agree, but any particular reason why you're confident in that?

Several. But do explain why

you

, of all people, want Townreads explained.

Perfect, thanks Empire! That's all I needed.

Wrong person and you should know it~ But you did not answer my question.

Also,

Granted, I missed him answering my question about buddying in his post. I was more focused on the other horrible shit he was saying.

But even still, his answer about why it was a "risk" to cross paths with Tierce doesn't sit well with me.

In post 113, Jabberwock wrote:

In post 112, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 111, Jabberwock wrote:

In post 107, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 105, Jabberwock wrote:The half of the Purpkin hydra that's (I'm assuming) has written all the posts so far.

Oh. Kay. Not saying I don't agree, but any particular reason why you're confident in that?

Several. But do explain why

you

, of all people, want Townreads explained.

Perfect, thanks Empire! That's all I needed.

Wrong person and you should know it~ But you did not answer my question.

Whatttttt. See this is why I want your posts signed. I thought you were Empire pulling out his meta on me.

As an answer, it was two pronged. Firstly, I just wanted to know if you had a particularly strong reason for the read, or if it was GUT! >=D.

Secondly, because I thought it was Empire, I wanted to test his reaction to me asking him about the reasons on one of his town reads. I'm notorious for advocating that it's anti-town to explain town reads. I figured if he was town he'd say something like that.

In post 106, TheIrishPope wrote:

In post 74, Lady Lambdadelta wrote: Why are you scared of her and not scared of Empire or me? I'm just as scary as she is.

Also, do you think buddying is a pro-town way to behave?

In post 81, TheIrishPope wrote:Silly Lady thinks she's scary. Empire is a more laid back player, anyway. I am not worried about him. I consider Natirasha a newbie since he just returned from a hiatus.
Catch up, kiddo.

Buddying can be pro-Town in many situations. You're just thinking too conventionally.

I see these two posts in logical order. Why do you think they are not?
@Purpkin, how convenient. Sweet dreams!
@morph the cat, sup. I want to hear more from you.
@Jabberwock, finally, the reaction I wanted. "Masturbatory walls" sealed the deal for me. I wouldn't say "knowledge". I'd say it's more of an overview. Do you not agree? How would you define your play style?
@Daemon, I don't understand the question. Also, don't fall into the "sticking out = Town" play. I've used it as scum. It worked.
@Lady, Bork is one half of Purpkin. Also, chill a bit.

I basically asked what your reads where since you said towns answers anything.

In post 115, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 113, Jabberwock wrote:

In post 112, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 111, Jabberwock wrote:

In post 107, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 105, Jabberwock wrote:The half of the Purpkin hydra that's (I'm assuming) has written all the posts so far.

Oh. Kay. Not saying I don't agree, but any particular reason why you're confident in that?

Several. But do explain why

you

, of all people, want Townreads explained.

Perfect, thanks Empire! That's all I needed.

Wrong person and you should know it~ But you did not answer my question.

Whatttttt. See this is why I want your posts signed. I thought you were Empire pulling out his meta on me.

As an answer, it was two pronged. Firstly, I just wanted to know if you had a particularly strong reason for the read, or if it was GUT! >=D.

Secondly, because I thought it was Empire, I wanted to test his reaction to me asking him about the reasons on one of his town reads. I'm notorious for advocating that it's anti-town to explain town reads. I figured if he was town he'd say something like that.

I believe that was my read.

@Jabberwock, I'm not trying to defame you or anything. Chill. It seems you're overreacting way too much. And I notice you did it again! "X is crap for no reason" is a nice statement indeed.
@Lady, I'm not understanding the Town motivation in your interaction with Tierce. And I'm so scared, a vote.
Natirasha has identity issues. Noted.
@Daemon, now now, that would be telling. Anything else to comment on? You seem smart. Tell me what you've seen so far. Also, what's your eye colour?

In post 117, morph the cat wrote:
I believe that was my read.

I've read this post 5 times now and I still don't know what you're saying. It's probably my fault, I'm tired. Can you rephrase or explain?

In post 115, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 113, Jabberwock wrote:

In post 112, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 111, Jabberwock wrote:

In post 107, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 105, Jabberwock wrote:The half of the Purpkin hydra that's (I'm assuming) has written all the posts so far.

Oh. Kay. Not saying I don't agree, but any particular reason why you're confident in that?

Several. But do explain why

you

, of all people, want Townreads explained.

Perfect, thanks Empire! That's all I needed.

Wrong person and you should know it~ But you did not answer my question.

Whatttttt. See this is why I want your posts signed. I thought you were Empire pulling out his meta on me.

As an answer, it was two pronged. Firstly, I just wanted to know if you had a particularly strong reason for the read, or if it was GUT! >=D.

Secondly, because I thought it was Empire, I wanted to test his reaction to me asking him about the reasons on one of his town reads. I'm notorious for advocating that it's anti-town to explain town reads. I figured if he was town he'd say something like that.

See, that is bullshit. For several reasons--if we were scum and it was Empire, I would have warned him about it. If we were Town (hi!), we are both known for explaining our Townreads and do so regardless of what we think, we are not here to appease you. And finally, it was a loaded question from you--given a direct, innocent response would be painted as scummy from you, when we both have solid established meta of explaining Townreads regardless of alignment.

Or, to put it in other words, you're doing a boring "haha reaction test" backpedal.


You're still not explaining where that Empire description came from, TIP.

It was ffery clarifying that the borktown thing was her read, initially.

EBWOP:

regardless of what think

In post 121, morph the cat wrote:It was ffery clarifying that the borktown thing was her read, initially.

Correct.

In post 118, TheIrishPope wrote:@Jabberwock, I'm not trying to defame you or anything. Chill. It seems you're overreacting way too much. And I notice you did it again! "X is crap for no reason" is a nice statement indeed.
@Lady, I'm not understanding the Town motivation in your interaction with Tierce. And I'm so scared, a vote.
Natirasha has identity issues. Noted.
@Daemon, now now, that would be telling. Anything else to comment on? You seem smart. Tell me what you've seen so far. Also, what's your eye colour?

I do think Jabberwock is being a bit over dramatic with some of his responses yes, but that doesn't really say a damn thing. I would like to hear his thoughts about you he mentioned in post 101 though. I'd read the whole damn wall if I had to, but you seem to have a lot to say about the matter. I'd love to hear it.