Page 5 of 81
Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 11:43 am
by BBmolla
I read your first post and my scumdar was pinged. Then you voted me. So I knew I'd have to address the incoming OMGUS call that I always get when I vote a scumread who is voting me.
It's really not that hard, vote someone HoH, have everyone indicate who they think is scum, put that guy on the lynch. Easy peasy. No need for 4 pages of theory discussion.
Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 11:47 am
by BBmolla
UNFoS: Peacebringer
Yeah I don't really feel like that anymore you're too snarky.
Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 11:48 am
by BBmolla
UNVOTE: Toasty
FoS: Toasty
VOTE: Jake and RBD
Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 11:52 am
by PeaceBringer
In post 100, BBmolla wrote:
I read your first post and my scumdar was pinged. Then you voted me. So I knew I'd have to address the incoming OMGUS call that I always get when I vote a scumread who is voting me.
It's really not that hard, vote someone HoH, have everyone indicate who they think is scum, put that guy on the lynch. Easy peasy. No need for 4 pages of theory discussion.
I entirely forgot about the FOS... it was basically a slap... lol you may or may not get used to me.
Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 12:40 pm
by BBmolla
Okay I like you just fine now
Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 1:22 pm
by Titus
That's a hell of a fast turn.
Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 2:04 pm
by BBmolla
Don't you try to fish for suspicion on me, make a stance is that scummy or not?
Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 2:56 pm
by Titus
Fish for suspicion? What the heck is that? It's a total overreaction to an observation. Your turn on Peacebringer, nor your early FOS make sense to me. I like to see if I can get clarification by just stating the behaviors I observe. Your reaction was over the top and melodramatic.
FoS BBMolla
Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 3:34 pm
by BBmolla
All you did was "Hm he did something that could be considered scummy..." instead of saying "He did this, that's scummy." It's just the sort of soft noncommital bullshit scum love to do.
Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 3:35 pm
by BBmolla
All you're trying to do is see if anyone else will agree with you, call me scum, and start a wagon on me. This'll allow a wagon to be started on me and then when I flip town you can blame whoever started the wagon instead of taking it yourself.
Congrats on committing after I called you out though.
Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 4:03 pm
by ToastyToast
Wow BB's reaction to Titus pressure is real bad.
FoS: BBmolla
Also voting me without giving a reason--so why do you suspect me?
Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 4:19 pm
by Voidedmafia
Votecount 1.04:
Toogeloo - Minions, peace
Jake - Bulb, Desp, BBmolla
bulb - Toasty, Titus
Not Voting - Imperium, keybladewielder, Gnomeo, blackberry, Jake from Rainbow Dash, RachMarie, Toogeloo
With 14 alive it takes 8 to elect an HoH. Currently Jake from Rainbowdash will be elected HoH, as they have the most votes.
Deadline is in (expired on 2013-09-05 12:03:01) or by 11:00 AM on September 5th, 2013
Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 4:55 pm
by BBmolla
In post 110, ToastyToast wrote:Wow BB's reaction to Titus pressure is real bad.
FoS: BBmolla
Also voting me without giving a reason--so why do you suspect me?
In post 66, ToastyToast wrote:Jake wrote:Which is why its better to decide who is going to get lynched, put them and alternative up and lynch the mane target with every vote.
That pun deserves an award.
And honestly I think we have to start steering away from flavor talk now. Everyone is going to want different things. I'm okay with the FoS thing, but if I don't like the main wagon I'm not going to put them up.
^This post is so terrible and wishy washy it deserves a vote.
Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 5:06 pm
by BBmolla
You think this serves any other purpose than planting bullshit suspicion without explicitly stating it?
Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 5:07 pm
by BBmolla
Elaborate for me Toasty- what about my reaction is bad, and why am I more likely to react "good" as town?
Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 5:10 pm
by PeaceBringer
I can go with jake also
unvote, vote Jake
Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 5:11 pm
by BBmolla
Like I'm not going to take here and take bullshit, talk to me so you can figure out I'm town. Or, if you're scum, pretend to figure out I'm town, I'm fine with that too.
Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 5:35 pm
by PeaceBringer
heck of lot of not talking for a site known for verbosity in posting...
Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 5:46 pm
by BBmolla
To be fair we don't really have any spam posters in this game.
Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 5:58 pm
by PeaceBringer
not so much the frequency but the length of posting... maybe it is the format but no extensive argumentation, no extensive meta-sizing, nice short, reasonable posting
Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 6:01 pm
by ToastyToast
In post 112, BBmolla wrote: In post 110, ToastyToast wrote:Wow BB's reaction to Titus pressure is real bad.
FoS: BBmolla
Also voting me without giving a reason--so why do you suspect me?
In post 66, ToastyToast wrote:Jake wrote:Which is why its better to decide who is going to get lynched, put them and alternative up and lynch the mane target with every vote.
That pun deserves an award.
And honestly I think we have to start steering away from flavor talk now. Everyone is going to want different things. I'm okay with the FoS thing, but if I don't like the main wagon I'm not going to put them up.
^This post is so terrible and wishy washy it deserves a vote.
How is that wishywashy? People should use FoS's for their suspicions but if I get chosen for HoH and dislike the main wagons then I'm going to say fuck that and put up who I want.
In post 114, BBmolla wrote:
Elaborate for me Toasty- what about my reaction is bad, and why am I more likely to react "good" as town?
You take off your other FoS after peace says "oops sorry!" about something
Then, "don't try to fish for suspicion?" what? What does that even mean? Titus called you out on something and you seem to interpret his observation as something non-commital.
Making a statement like Titus did (with the fast turn thing) is basically someone saying "hey, this one thing is scummy but its not enough for an FoS." Its a point, essentially. At least that's how I've always seen it.
In post 109, BBmolla wrote:All you're trying to do is see if anyone else will agree with you, call me scum, and start a wagon on me. This'll allow a wagon to be started on me and then when I flip town you can blame whoever started the wagon instead of taking it yourself.
Congrats on committing after I called you out though.
Another overreaction.
Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 6:03 pm
by PeaceBringer
perhaps I spoke too soon...lol
Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 6:05 pm
by PeaceBringer
Toasty- I never said oops sorry about anything. I stand behind what I said and do... so digits are being erected your way perhaps
Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 6:12 pm
by ToastyToast
In post 103, PeaceBringer wrote: In post 100, BBmolla wrote:
I read your first post and my scumdar was pinged. Then you voted me. So I knew I'd have to address the incoming OMGUS call that I always get when I vote a scumread who is voting me.
It's really not that hard, vote someone HoH, have everyone indicate who they think is scum, put that guy on the lynch. Easy peasy. No need for 4 pages of theory discussion.
I entirely forgot about the FOS... it was basically a slap... lol you may or may not get used to me.
Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 6:15 pm
by BBmolla
In post 120, ToastyToast wrote:Making a statement like Titus did (with the fast turn thing) is basically someone saying "hey, this one thing is scummy but its not enough for an FoS." Its a point, essentially. At least that's how I've always seen it.
He didn't even call it scummy, he just pointed it out. That's a big difference dood.
Over reacting isn't a scumtell