Mafiascum.net

To rephrase,

In post 35, Nachomamma8 wrote:NO NO NO NO NO

This is when I first thought Nacho was going to "freak out" to look town.

In post 32, Nachomamma8 wrote:if he was town he'd be panicking, calling me scum with whiskers, screaming his pretty little head off

And then everybody (again, "everybody" is like, two people) went, "WHOA, HE SURE IS DEFENSIVE!" And I was like, "9___9 jeez you guys didn't anybody read this post (32)?"

Sorry but this makes no sense, and the only feeling I get from your posts is that you're trying to be manipulative.

In post 93, Wisdom wrote:

In post 83, Mirari wrote:I agree with your vote on Whiskers. He doesn't seem comfortable right now.

Can you elaborate on this?

I will later I s'pose. I don't really like my vote on Whiskers anymore. His theory makes a certain amount of sense. Even if it is a bad theory I don't think he would be advocating something this paranoid at this stage of the game.

UNVOTE:

I'll return when I have less distractions.

In post 100, Whiskers wrote:To rephrase,

In post 35, Nachomamma8 wrote:NO NO NO NO NO

This is when I first thought Nacho was going to "freak out" to look town.

In post 32, Nachomamma8 wrote:if he was town he'd be panicking, calling me scum with whiskers, screaming his pretty little head off

And then everybody (again, "everybody" is like, two people) went, "WHOA, HE SURE IS DEFENSIVE!" And I was like, "9___9 jeez you guys didn't anybody read this post (32)?"

So your entire case hinges on a comment that Nacho made that was specifically referring to Wisdom?

Nacho wasn't saying "all town freaks out and gets defensive," he was saying that Wis should have been freaking out.

two hyperactive games at once?! *sigh*
starting to read in a few minutes

"Every great journey starts with a small step." ...starting to read through. seriously, only ooba and mirari are people I haven't played with
~~~

No comments on p1.

At mollie on post 46: are you serious with that townread? explain?
~~~

Bringing first good stuff into the game - post 63 is good by mollie. I can definitely call that a townread.
~~~

Longpost 78 by mala. I don't like it.. too many reads too quick into the game.
~~~

Elaborate on your post 83 please, mirari. it looks like your vote is serious. why?
~~~

laughed loudly at wisdoms 89 & 90, lol...bees...that's a verb..

@whiskers please explain this post
that really makes no sense. as repeated in 101.
~~~

@mirari 102: what the hell is that you're talking about? any theories? what makes sense and what didn't make sense that you voted and unvoted? you can't post 102 and 103 without explaining

also that doesn't make sense

oh wait it's des on 103.

your avvies are too similar.

that makes sense now, lol.

In post 106, shos wrote:laughed loudly at wisdoms 89 & 90, lol...bees...that's a verb..

whiskers*

78 isn't too long, really Shos? It's about the same size as your catch up.

Wisdom - his ISO the last few posts by him are reading as defensive. I can quote them if you like, but for me it makes me lean town on him.

Quote please, yes.

Got very close to forgetting about this game.
Catching up tomorrow!

In post 80, MattP wrote:

In post 77, Nachomamma8 wrote: I thought you were using mollie's interactions with me in order to read me. You not using them to read me at all is incredibly disappointing

I have no idea how you're reading my posts

In a way they weren't meant to be read.

In post 87, Desperado wrote:wait i thought we were speedlynching wisdom

We were, but then they got cold feet for some inexplicable reason.

In post 90, Whiskers wrote:Also, didn't anybody else realize? Everybody saying that Nachomamma got really defensive: did you forget that just before that, he was saying that a townie getting voted would get really defensive? I don't think he's suspicious for being "defensive" about being voted-- that's a playstyle thing, everypony is different-- no, I think he's suspicious for being defensive because I believe he's intentionally doing it, playing to a sort of idealized town meta.

To recap:
"It's town to be a horse"
*bees a horse*
See?

Where was I defensive again?

I'd rather Mala answer that before Whiskers does.

In post 110, Malakittens wrote:78 isn't too long, really Shos? It's about the same size as your catch up.

Wisdom - his ISO the last few posts by him are reading as defensive. I can quote them if you like, but for me it makes me lean town on him.

I'm not criticizing the size of your post. I'm criticizing its content. having so many reads so quickly, that's a real feat. I had like, one, and it was weak.

In post 93, Wisdom wrote:

In post 83, Mirari wrote:I agree with your vote on Whiskers. He doesn't seem comfortable right now.

Can you elaborate on this?

In post 106, shos wrote:Elaborate on your post 83 please, mirari. it looks like your vote is serious. why?

In post 27, Whiskers wrote:Pirate Mollie is super scum or super new noobie noob?

Can't tell.

Also shos, you're terrible at reaction tests, unless you are scum who is sloppy on purpose.

Daykill: shos

This post in particular of Whiskers' 3 early game posts looks contrived. His antics do not seem genuine as expressions of his personality. My impression of those 3 posts was Whiskers trying to talk about things for the sake of talking.

In post 106, shos wrote:@mirari 102: what the hell is that you're talking about? any theories? what makes sense and what didn't make sense that you voted and unvoted? you can't post 102 and 103 without explaining

I unvoted Whiskers because his theory is plausible. Offhand comments about what a townsperson's actions in a specific situation cull agreement on a read. A person who wants to slowly build rapport with the town, especially the person being townread, would mimic those actions
I don't think Whiskers as scum would try to push a theory this early in the game.

I'm not a fan of shos's 106. Same line of thought about Whiskers' early play - commenting to comment.

that's a page 2 post, don't you think that talking aimlessly is the only thinkg you can practically do?

anyway, I agree with that theory, didn't realize that was a 'theory' lol.

In post 101, Wisdom wrote:Sorry but this makes no sense, and the only feeling I get from your posts is that you're trying to be manipulative.

Ok.

In post 106, shos wrote:@whiskers please explain this post
that really makes no sense. as repeated in 101.

99 was a response to Wisdom.
100 was the explanation for that, since I realized it might raise some questions.

In post 111, Wisdom wrote:Quote please, yes.

Wisdom is playing townily.

In post 114, Wisdom wrote:I'd rather Mala answer that before Whiskers does.

Which is why I specifically didn't answer it when you asked Mala... although, I guess I ended up doing it anyway, which makes me wonder why Nacho is asking this in the first place...

In post 116, Mirari wrote:This post in particular of Whiskers' 3 early game posts looks contrived. His antics do not seem genuine as expressions of his personality. My impression of those 3 posts was Whiskers trying to talk about things for the sake of talking.

The daykill bit is a little unusual for me, usually when I do stuff like that, I get lynched. So I don't do it anymore. But I've got kind of a fetish for daykills-- expect to see me asking about them later in the game.

In post 116, Mirari wrote: I don't think Whiskers as scum would try to push a theory this early in the game.

I should point out that I don't really play my scum game different from my town game. At all (except maybe not daykilling people wildly). That's the only reason I'm good as either.

In post 103, Desperado wrote:

In post 32, Nachomamma8 wrote:if he was town he'd be panicking, calling me scum with whiskers, screaming his pretty little head off

So your entire case hinges on a comment that Nacho made that was specifically referring to Wisdom?

Nacho wasn't saying "all town freaks out and gets defensive," he was saying that Wis should have been freaking out.[/quote]
Why do you think this is a Wisdom-specific meta that Nacho is using? Have you played with Wisdom before? Do you agree that, him as town, would go all muppet-armed over being Random-Vote-Wagonned early Day 1? Do you agree with Nacho's meta of him?

Or if not, what makes you think that Nachomamma is referring only to Wisdom with this comment? What makes you think that it was a comment about Wisdom, not a comment about town-play?

In post 120, Whiskers wrote:

In post 103, Desperado wrote:

In post 32, Nachomamma8 wrote:if he was town he'd be panicking, calling me scum with whiskers, screaming his pretty little head off

[@Whiskers]

So your entire case hinges on a comment that Nacho made that was specifically referring to Wisdom?

Nacho wasn't saying "all town freaks out and gets defensive," he was saying that Wis should have been freaking out.

Why do you think this is a Wisdom-specific meta that Nacho is using? Have you played with Wisdom before? Do you agree that, him as town, would go all muppet-armed over being Random-Vote-Wagonned early Day 1? Do you agree with Nacho's meta of him?

Or if not, what makes you think that Nachomamma is referring only to Wisdom with this comment? What makes you think that it was a comment about Wisdom, not a comment about town-play?[/quote]

I understood that it was a relative tell that he was talking about.

what is funny is I don't really think that nacho was being defensive, I was mostly trolling him and pushing his buttons and while I get why arc and mebbe even mala followed my push cos they he and I are pretty good friends and sometimes nacho can be a blank slate that is best observed through other people's eyes when all you see is an empty canvas but i find push to be weird.

what the fuck is wrong with quote tags today I didn't change anything

@ shos

yes it is a serious read. arc's entrance into the game was easy and breezy I mean she did not give a flying fuck how she looked. <------ town

mollie I had the feeling mala just sheeped the 'defensive nacho' belief thinking it's the cool thing to do. disagree?