Mafiascum.net

With 13 alive it takes 7 to lynch.


[L-7] Keybladewielder
[L-7] Kalimar
[L-7] Mr_Blonde
[L-7] Zebe
[L-7] Cheery Dog
[L-7] Smudger
[L-7] gamsimbre
[L-7] EspeciallyTheLies
[L-6] : Mr_Blonde
[L-6] : Lucky2u
[L-5] : aptil, Kalimar
[L-5] : gamsimbre, Cheery Dog
: EspeciallyTheLies, Does Bo Know, BBmolla

Not voting (4): Keybladewielder, Zebe, Wake88, Smudger

Lucky2u wrote:finally caught up here. So there was a fake cop result gambit and ETL is voting me for a dumb reason. No body takes RVS seriously. It's a silly stage of the game and your voting me for doing it wrong? Allow me to correct that then.

Original Roll String: 1d13

1 13-Sided Dice: (13) = 13

Lucky2u wrote:VOTE: Aptil

Because the dice said so.

There, am I doing it right?

....


Are you fucking with me or are you really that bad?

Not fucking with you, that's really how I'm going to decide my votes this game. /heavy sarcasm.

*sigh*

You see why I voted you in the first place

In post 103, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:*sigh*

You see why I voted you in the first place

Because of my awesome sense of humor?

Really I'm not sure why you chose me out of everyone to attack. Are you saying that everyone who has been active is reading town to you so you looked to the inactive players for a vote?

No my very first post. -.-

Ok, so I attacked you a bit harshly last game. Bringing in those feelings are irrelevant and I was playing toward my scum wincon in that game in the best way I knew how. You know I <3 you! But all is fair in love, war, and mafia.

It relevant cuz I wont be giving you such an easy pass for bs this time.

In post 107, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:It relevant cuz I wont be giving you such an easy pass for bs this time.

But your accusing of me started with my RVS. RVS is purposeful BS, not to be taken seriously. I usually vote the person I'm most familiar with in the game as a way of saying hello! I do that as both scum and town, so the fact that I did something unusual means nothing.

On the other hand, your attitude toward me this game for a previous game is either scum motivated or bad town motivated. Either way it is not in favor of the town.

In post 108, Lucky2u wrote:I usually vote the person I'm most familiar with in the game as a way of saying hello

Yeah and you didn't?

That's my point.

And really? My pushing of you for actual interaction is "either scum motivated or bad town motivated"? You cannot be serious.

Please explain how pressuring people to interact is "either scum motivated or bad town motivated".

If you were pressuring for interactions then sure, that's fine and dandy town behavior. That's not what I said thought was it? Your feelings of a previous game are making you prejudice and THAT is scum or bad town behavior.

In post 109, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:

In post 108, Lucky2u wrote:I usually vote the person I'm most familiar with in the game as a way of saying hello

Yeah and you didn't?

That's my point.

I explained this already. I do it as scum and town, so when I do something completely new that has no precedent how do you draw the conclusion that it's scum?

I don't think that's very fair, Lucky. We all learn from our experiences with other players. What I learned was not to underestimate you and to pay closer attention to what you are doing. Do you really expect me to ignore that and just not apply your meta elsewhere?

p-edit: Because . That's pretty standard analysis....

In post 112, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:I don't think that's very fair, Lucky. We all learn from our experiences with other players. What I learned was not to underestimate you and to pay closer attention to what you are doing. Do you really expect me to ignore that and just not apply your meta elsewhere?

p-edit: Because

deviation from normal meta = something is up

. That's pretty standard analysis....

What your telling me is that you are now paranoid that I'm a good scum and could be scum even if I appear town.

Deviation from town meta = scum is an argument you could make. Deviation from a null meta = scum is a bit of a stretch but I could see what you mean. Again though, I think your just being prejudice toward me.

Wow, lots of posts since I checked last time!

In post 78, Wake1 wrote:Yeah, I don't like this from you two. His first post wasn't serious, and was a playful poke at MS for its problems. I'd do the same. Your reason for voting him is nonexistent.having an unserious post isn't Scummy, and you know that, so what are you doing?

I agree with this, I assumed lucky's vote was just a joke and he'd eventually get around to something. However, lucky's next post completely disregards the whole BB gambiting Wake thing, and doesn't haven't any feelings about whether or not about if it's scummy or not. Lucky, do you have anything else to say about what happened then?

Oh and right now I am in favor of this Lucky bandwagon so I will UNVOTE: my random vote on Bo and VOTE: Lucky2u.

In post 113, Lucky2u wrote:What your telling me is that you are now paranoid that I'm a good scum and could be scum even if I appear town.

Well obviously you don't look town to me, or I'd be voting elsewhere And I don't operate on paranoia. I'm not Wisdom.

Also trying to figure out if gam is newbie scum .

In post 117, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Also trying to figure out if gam is newbie scum .

Why? What do you see?

...

I'll sort this out later.

In post 98, Lucky2u wrote:VOTE: Aptil

Because the dice said so.

There, am I doing it right?

You're doing it even more wrong.

#98 is so bad Lucky . There is enough content for you to comment on . Instead you go and do a random vote .

Give him time.

Lucky, I'm assuming you do plan to get into this game.

Prod-dodging here.

I'll be home later tonight and I'll be able to get on my laptop and reread properly.

In post 114, gamsimbre wrote:Wow, lots of posts since I checked last time!

In post 78, Wake1 wrote:Yeah, I don't like this from you two. His first post wasn't serious, and was a playful poke at MS for its problems. I'd do the same. Your reason for voting him is nonexistent.having an unserious post isn't Scummy, and you know that, so what are you doing?

I agree with this, I assumed lucky's vote was just a joke and he'd eventually get around to something. However, lucky's next post completely disregards the whole BB gambiting Wake thing, and doesn't haven't any feelings about whether or not about if it's scummy or not. Lucky, do you have anything else to say about what happened then?

@Bo: something about this post really pings me. The waffly nature he took by agreeing with wake about me, asking lucky for input, but then voting him anyway is weird.

VOTE: gam