Mini 1555 Board Game UPick Mafia--Game Over!


Forum rules
User avatar
Porkens
Porkens
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Porkens
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9700
Joined: June 20, 2008

Post Post #100 (ISO) » Thu Feb 27, 2014 12:33 pm

Post by Porkens »

Tammy,
First I want to say that I understand your frustration and sympathise. For the part I am playing in it, I want to express my regret. I know how frustrating it is when the game isn't going in a direction that I am comfortable with and when I have to spend my time reading pages of stuff I don't think is productive. From my own perspective, this charter idea is to combat what frustrates
me
; everyone acting like a lone-wolf from their own corner of the game.
In response to your specific concerns about the charters efficacy, I'd like to ask a couple questions: What is Magna Carta Redux refering to? Is that a game where somethign like this happened? In addition, if you could dictate or have direct input on how other people in the game played, what would your list look like?
Finally, about the subjects of my posts. Yes, I am only posting about the charter and trying to see if it can work. I'm excited about the idea, and I'm still feeling it out with you all. Rest assured I am making mental notes about how people respond, and those notes will come out as the game progresses. In addition, players like Spyrex have also taken up that part of the day's activities very well, so I feel that it's being taken care of for the time being.
worse than random
User avatar
Porkens
Porkens
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Porkens
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9700
Joined: June 20, 2008

Post Post #101 (ISO) » Thu Feb 27, 2014 12:34 pm

Post by Porkens »

In answer to your last question, yes; ideally that is what will happen. However, again, I think the planning and act of systematizing it and holding people accountable to it would be benefitial.
worse than random
User avatar
SpyreX
SpyreX
POWERFUL WIZARD
User avatar
User avatar
SpyreX
POWERFUL WIZARD
POWERFUL WIZARD
Posts: 18596
Joined: April 24, 2008

Post Post #102 (ISO) » Thu Feb 27, 2014 12:56 pm

Post by SpyreX »

Kdub wrote:Given these possibilities and your views on them, do you think that scum are therefore more likely to agree with the charter so that more of them get into the town bloc?
Agreement or disagreement doesn't really mean anything. Its the how and why. I think that scum that feel they could use it to their advantage would say yes, scum that know they're in trouble from the idea of it would say no (see hiplop un eagle).
LastManStanding wrote:I have an idea. How about each of us post the board game picks we made? It has no relevance on alignments but it could be useful (and fun?) to see. I'll lead by example. I picked Dominion because me and my friends play it all the time.
Nope. Not at this point. Without knowing all the pieces of the pie, this is usually an idea that has minimal upside and could have huge downside.
Porkens wrote:Posting at work so forgive my brevity and ignorance of some of the particulars.

Tammy's(I think?) post about the charter getting rid of the activities she usually uses made me think of something: What if the charter was not only a code of behavior, but also described a course of actions and responsibilities? We could design it, for example, to force every player to do certain things and/or have us plan our course of action: A specific example or two:

-Each player must provide a complete reads list every X days/posts.
-On day 1, the players will lynch the person with the lowest number of posts.
-At the beginning of day 2, the 3 top scumreads will be debated in open forum to determine the lynch.

Someone else pointed out that the charter wouldn't be set in stone. Of course negotiating and altering these things would also give us reads.
Not a good idea - its the concept, the simple idea of "hey, lets move forward in a unified direction" thats important. Codification is begging for dissention and/or gaming.

@Tammy you're killin me smalls:
The only person who has really approached the way that people reacted to the charter with any sense of depth is spyspy and I'm not going to just call him town from that because he's capable of putting out what he has so far as scum. HOWEVER, he feels a little bit different from his replace in posts in faraday's upick, but he was also a replacement and I think I remember him saying that he didn't have as much time to put into it as he would have liked. But his reads list gave me little warm fuzzies because it looked like he was actually looking at the motivation of the people.
That's the thing. Until I got here I was not stoked about that post at all but here you see it is not only possible but I'll say flat out
better
then the normal RVS dongers to talk about something that gives insight into motivations and direction. Its like you missed the forest for the trees.

The early game is here - go hog wild. But don't think that the 'charter' talk is really moving away from the important part of looking at the motivations.
Show
I always lynch scum... sometimes they're just not mafia. :P

Town: (49-47-1)
Scum: (23-11)
Third Party: (2-0)
Proud member of BaM
User avatar
The Betting Pool
The Betting Pool
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
The Betting Pool
Goon
Goon
Posts: 470
Joined: January 7, 2014

Post Post #103 (ISO) » Thu Feb 27, 2014 1:40 pm

Post by The Betting Pool »

Vote Count 1.03:

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch!

LastManStanding (L-7):
morph the cat (L-5): Hadrian, Madotsuki
Madotsuki (L-7):
Porkens (L-5): hiplop, 1baldeagle1
Quill (L-7):
SpyreX (L-7):
HighShroomish (L-6): Kdub
hiplop (L-5): Spyrex, awesomeusername
awesomeusername (L-7):
Kdub (L-7):
Surye (L-7):
1baldeagle1 (L-7):
Hadrian (L-7):

Not Voting: LastManStanding, morph the cat, Porkens, Quill, HighShroomish, Surye

V/LA:

Deadline is in (expired on 2014-03-12 19:16:41)
User avatar
Porkens
Porkens
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Porkens
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9700
Joined: June 20, 2008

Post Post #104 (ISO) » Thu Feb 27, 2014 2:03 pm

Post by Porkens »

In post 102, SpyreX wrote: Not a good idea - its the concept, the simple idea of "hey, lets move forward in a unified direction" thats important. Codification is begging for dissention and/or gaming.
You are absolutely right in that "hey, let's move forward in a unified direction" is the most important part. However, I don't think codification is a bad idea for a few reasons. First of all, it adds something to the process, which, as you point out, is what brings people to the table and gives us something to analyze (the how and why). Therefore, going through the motions of codification would yeild a goldmine of information. Secondly, dissention is going to happen no matter what, and even moreso without a social contract. In addition, "gaming" would be, I believe, easy to spot. As it has been said a coouple times: if the scum are forced to participate in a pro-town way, more the better for town. Finally, if we here work together to codify pro-town behavior, that could have lasting effects on the community at large, and combat the shit-meta that I know you and I hate in equal measure.
worse than random
User avatar
Porkens
Porkens
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Porkens
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9700
Joined: June 20, 2008

Post Post #105 (ISO) » Thu Feb 27, 2014 2:05 pm

Post by Porkens »

How does shit get done in your office? Hopefully it's with planning and project management. We have 12 days, 22 hours, and 12 minutes to find and kill the scum, or at least set ourselves up for success in later days. Let's come together and figure out how we are going to do that, who's going to be responsible for what, and how we are going to keep people accountable to their responsibilities.
worse than random
User avatar
Kdub
Kdub
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Kdub
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4220
Joined: March 3, 2009

Post Post #106 (ISO) » Thu Feb 27, 2014 2:21 pm

Post by Kdub »

In post 81, morph the cat wrote:I don't think I have a particularly unique approach to scum roles.
Then I guess I'm a bit unclear as to your stance on the charter. If you think it won't be effective at catching you-scum, and you think other players approach scum roles in a similar way, then...? Are you townreading the pro-charter players independent of their stance on the charta, or is their pro-charta stance part of the reason you are townreading them?
In post 82, Quill wrote: kdub - But probably town for engaging us while opposing the charter
I'm not directly opposed, I just don't think it's going to change the game very much whether we adopt the charter or not. So make a new category called "meh" for me.
In post 86, LastManStanding wrote:I have an idea. How about each of us post the board game picks we made? It has no relevance on alignments but it could be useful (and fun?) to see. I'll lead by example. I picked Dominion because me and my friends play it all the time.
In what way could this be useful to town right now?
In post 90, Porkens wrote:-On day 1, the players will lynch the person with the lowest number of posts.
OK, if you add this, move me from "meh" to "anti-charter". If we policy lynch the person with the lowest number of posts D1, we have effectively removed any information we would have gained from that player's flip since we can't analyze the reasons that people were on the wagon.

Just reading over the first couple pages again, Madotsuki is going to be annoying to read if he has a post restriction. Madotsuki, can you confirm this, or were you just messing around?

I'm liking Quil's and awesome for , which I find to come from a pro-town mindset.

I'm wary of LMS. Post comes across as very safe and fence-sittish on Porkens and the charter, but does scum come right out and propose a mass name-claim on D1? LMS, how much past mafia experience do you have off-site?
Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic Mafia - 17-player large theme, currently needs (0) replacements
User avatar
Porkens
Porkens
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Porkens
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9700
Joined: June 20, 2008

Post Post #107 (ISO) » Thu Feb 27, 2014 2:26 pm

Post by Porkens »

Fair point. I was focusing on the idea that it would force people to post more. Anyway, I'm not married to any of my suggestions, nor am I asking you to be for or against "my" charter, I'm asking you to participate in writing the rules.
worse than random
User avatar
1baldeagle1
1baldeagle1
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
1baldeagle1
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1955
Joined: July 28, 2013

Post Post #108 (ISO) » Thu Feb 27, 2014 2:31 pm

Post by 1baldeagle1 »

In post 44, morph the cat wrote:
In post 42, 1baldeagle1 wrote:No, this sucks. Actually, I find this scummy. You are trying to take control of the town by making a "charter" in which it gives the scum a good hiding spot. So, you are basically give you
and your scumbuddies
a hiding spot. You are
clueless
scum and you need to be lynched.
1. What is the "hiding spot"?
2. Explain the bolded.
3. Explain who you define as his buddies in the italicized.
1. Well, according to his lynch order, the charter members don't get lynched until everyone else is lynched.
2. By clueless, I meant he doesn't have a clue how to play scum correctly.
3. Basically, I suspect one of his buddies to agree to the charter so he gets a hiding spot, and possibly the other buddy would oppose it to distance each other.

@Tammy, well, the meta part is basically telling me this is how morph leads and asks questions as town. I played one game of scumcabd, and he was (from what I remember), just posting reads and making a couple statements.

My issue with the charter is that, well not everyone is going to agree to it, right? I can see a scum player making up an distraction and if someone one doesn't agree with it is instantly scum. He's basically forcing a townblock and putting himself in it. It's the perfect way to get people lynched because they simply don't agree with the charter.
You can find my meta on my wiki.
User avatar
1baldeagle1
1baldeagle1
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
1baldeagle1
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1955
Joined: July 28, 2013

Post Post #109 (ISO) » Thu Feb 27, 2014 2:32 pm

Post by 1baldeagle1 »

Basically, it's just a distraction. The charter is set up to distract us so we end up talking about it rather than scumhunting.
You can find my meta on my wiki.
User avatar
HighShroomish
HighShroomish
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
HighShroomish
Goon
Goon
Posts: 553
Joined: December 15, 2013
Location: Middle Georgia

Post Post #110 (ISO) » Thu Feb 27, 2014 2:52 pm

Post by HighShroomish »

@porkens the charter probably isn't something you should introduce in a big game- or we get five pages of a grand total of zip that is really useful. People have set ways that they use to find scum and town, and they have certain playstyles. No way around that. I would think the charter would be benificialmif you started in the Newbie games, so that players just starting can play, well, like that. Eventually, it will probably be a site side thing. Starting it here was probably not the best idea.

@Hadrian you, I like you.
User avatar
morph the cat
morph the cat
Sync Achieved
User avatar
User avatar
morph the cat
Sync Achieved
Sync Achieved
Posts: 8828
Joined: July 14, 2013

Post Post #111 (ISO) » Thu Feb 27, 2014 3:09 pm

Post by morph the cat »

In post 106, Kdub wrote:Then I guess I'm a bit unclear as to your stance on the charter. If you think it won't be effective at catching you-scum, and you think other players approach scum roles in a similar way, then...? Are you townreading the pro-charter players independent of their stance on the charta, or is their pro-charta stance part of the reason you are townreading them?
I don't think it would be all that effective in catching players like me (fferyllt), because my scum game kinda revolves around being agreeable and doing stuff that looks useful but doesn't lead anywhere productive, and charter discussions would be pretty easy to push in that direction. Cabd's scum game is different - a lot more proactive - and how he'd use the discussion is probably different as well.

Spyrex made a good point about it shutting down some scumgames, though, and making a path through the lynches and night kills a lot more difficult if only one scum made it into the charter group.

I'm not townreading anyone solely because they are pro-charter. I'm not townreading anyone solely because they are anti-charter. I'm townreading based on the arguments and reasons for either stance.
User avatar
Kdub
Kdub
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Kdub
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4220
Joined: March 3, 2009

Post Post #112 (ISO) » Thu Feb 27, 2014 3:36 pm

Post by Kdub »

In post 110, HighShroomish wrote:@porkens the charter probably isn't something you should introduce in a big game- or we get five pages of a grand total of zip that is really useful. People have set ways that they use to find scum and town, and they have certain playstyles. No way around that. I would think the charter would be benificialmif you started in the Newbie games, so that players just starting can play, well, like that. Eventually, it will probably be a site side thing. Starting it here was probably not the best idea.
This feels like a bit of a backpedal from the anti-charter stance in . I'm pretty comfortable with my vote right now.
morph the cat wrote:I don't think it would be all that effective in catching players like me (fferyllt), because my scum game kinda revolves around being agreeable and doing stuff that looks useful but doesn't lead anywhere productive, and charter discussions would be pretty easy to push in that direction. Cabd's scum game is different - a lot more proactive - and how he'd use the discussion is probably different as well.
Ah, I forgot you were a hydra. OK then.
Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic Mafia - 17-player large theme, currently needs (0) replacements
User avatar
HighShroomish
HighShroomish
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
HighShroomish
Goon
Goon
Posts: 553
Joined: December 15, 2013
Location: Middle Georgia

Post Post #113 (ISO) » Thu Feb 27, 2014 3:41 pm

Post by HighShroomish »

It's a backpedal... How?
hiplop
hiplop
Jury Darling
hiplop
Jury Darling
Jury Darling
Posts: 12497
Joined: March 23, 2011
Location: full of self
Contact:

Post Post #114 (ISO) » Thu Feb 27, 2014 3:42 pm

Post by hiplop »

@mod the storm is coming and going so, for now I have power. Unsure about later on, though

Noted.


this charter idea is terrible. the core problem is that its punishing anti-town, rather than scum. Bad players have just as much chance of being scum or town

I like where my vote is so far (as of page 2)
In post 62, SpyreX wrote:
Porkens wrote:Since I've come back to the game, I haven't seen towns that work together. Granted, it's just been a few games, but the things that consistently rule the games (especially the early game) are personality, reputations, and meta. Every post is a one-up, every argument degenerates into personal insults. It A) makes the game not fun, and B) benefits only the scum. Every player is too concerned with being right and showing off their big scum-hunting dick. Lurkers and no-content posters are allowed to linger to lylo because "that's how they play." I believe if we treat this game like a business, and make the first priority to work together, two things will happen. 1) the chaff will get lynched and the game will get better. 2) the scum will be forced to play in a pro-town manner. That means more bussing, more lynching of scum. These two changes will lead to more town victories.
I love this a million times.

Something like a "charter" is a very twisted sword - the actual speaking of it makes it almost impossible to do, but the discussion of it makes the end result happen anyways. Three pages in and I'm happier about how this is going then many games I've been in a while.

Because, at heart, its not about the agreement or disagreement, its about the process behind it. Which is why even at this point I can do something like this and the fact its happening now makes my heart aflutter.

Town as hell tm:


Quil - This is looking at an idea, not making a snap judgement, weighing the bad versus the good and cutting to some really important parts of it right out of the gate. Especially explaining with words why things are done and the fact at the end of the day round one is "people playing like town" versus "people playing like scum" versus "town" and "scum".
Hadrian - ohh hey look open dissent in such a way
that points to exactly what its trying to accomplish.
SO GUESS WHAT YOU ARE IN WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT BUDDY.
Porkens - duh

Town:

morph - I like most of what I see. However, versus the others this could be faked some depending on how things shake out but thats a tiny bit of paranoia.
kdub - Its the agreeing with most every word thats said. Mirror-ego syndrome paranoia keeps from the above.

Probably Town but makes me paranoid as shit:

Awesomeusername - I keep looking at post 55 and I can't put my finger on exactly what it is that makes me want to sneak up behind him with a garrote but there's something there. Something...sinister. But I am old and, as said, paranoid.

Probably Scum:

HighShroomish - I'm not taking the time to go through and look deeply at his games, but the whole idea of "scum totally play like town you guys" is so foreign to the wasteland I live in and this is just the right kind of alarm bells I'm not stoked. I only say probably because

Actually needs to be turned into fertilizer because jesus:

1baldeagle1 - I dont even know where to begin. If I were to measure the desire to kill versus the amount of words in that post somehow the desire to kill is actually HIGHER then the number of words. Thats a feat in and of itself. The fact "lurksack-town meta" was already brought up is a giant warning red klaxon that this shit needs to meet its friend the dodo right fast.
hiplop - This will be referred to from now until forever as the "inverse Quil". On top of not actually being useful when being a real vote, its a snap dismissal under the guise of it being actually bad.

Now, in that perfect world I dream of when I go to sleep?

Those 6 names in the top would shake the shit out of every name not mentioned while manically murdering the hell out of the bottom of that list. If, in those three names, there isn't a scum I'd be surprised.
geez, sorry for being stuck in a massive-ass snow storm -_-

kdub looks fishy to me for virtually the same reason as what spyrex said in this post, btw.

(the site isnt letting me quote Porkens post about #90 but i want to refer to it here)

I liked this explanation of the charter, but having members is just a bad idea imo.

tbh, I dont think porkens is scum at all right now so I'm going to
UNVOTE:
It's a bad idea, not a scummy one

1bald1eagle is giving me a bad rub...
Last edited by The Betting Pool on Fri Feb 28, 2014 6:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
third best scummer of all time
User avatar
morph the cat
morph the cat
Sync Achieved
User avatar
User avatar
morph the cat
Sync Achieved
Sync Achieved
Posts: 8828
Joined: July 14, 2013

Post Post #115 (ISO) » Thu Feb 27, 2014 5:43 pm

Post by morph the cat »

http://forum.mafiascum.net/search.php?a ... 8&sr=posts

Chalk one scum up to "trying to pick a stance to not feel awkward and caught out of step while posting elsewhere"

And everyone got daystart PMs yesterday, so that's not even an excuse.


VOTE: surye
User avatar
Hadrian
Hadrian
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Hadrian
Goon
Goon
Posts: 341
Joined: December 28, 2013

Post Post #116 (ISO) » Thu Feb 27, 2014 5:52 pm

Post by Hadrian »

Don't you think you're jumping the gun there, hoss? By my time settings, the last user post was 5:28, and the daystart pm wasn't until 6:21.
User avatar
Porkens
Porkens
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Porkens
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9700
Joined: June 20, 2008

Post Post #117 (ISO) » Thu Feb 27, 2014 5:53 pm

Post by Porkens »

In post 108, 1baldeagle1 wrote: 1. Well, according to his lynch order, the charter members don't get lynched until everyone else is lynched.
2. By clueless, I meant he doesn't have a clue how to play scum correctly.
3. Basically, I suspect one of his buddies to agree to the charter so he gets a hiding spot, and possibly the other buddy would oppose it to distance each other.

@Tammy, well, the meta part is basically telling me this is how morph leads and asks questions as town. I played one game of scumcabd, and he was (from what I remember), just posting reads and making a couple statements.

My issue with the charter is that, well not everyone is going to agree to it, right? I can see a scum player making up an distraction and if someone one doesn't agree with it is instantly scum. He's basically forcing a townblock and putting himself in it. It's the perfect way to get people lynched because they simply don't agree with the charter.
1. As I said before, the lynch order, as with everything else in the charter, is up for negotiation.
2-3. So you think i suck at scum but have come up with this masterplan, and me and my scum buddies have day talk?

You said talking about this topic is a distraction from scumhunting. What do you consider "scumhunting"? Would you be happy if everyone did what you define as scumhunting?

I would be held to the same standards as everyone else, and there is no reason we'd have to lynch people who didn't agree with the charter unless we agreed that's what we wanted the charter to do.
In post 110, HighShroomish wrote:@porkens the charter probably isn't something you should introduce in a big game- or we get five pages of a grand total of zip that is really useful. People have set ways that they use to find scum and town, and they have certain playstyles. No way around that. I would think the charter would be benificialmif you started in the Newbie games, so that players just starting can play, well, like that. Eventually, it will probably be a site side thing. Starting it here was probably not the best idea.
Why are you admonishing me for trying to make everyone play well? How is this a "big" game? What else would you like to see in the first five pages that would be more useful? Why do you think people can't change their play styles? Are you still under the impression that the charter is something I would make that would tell other people what to do? How can you say this would be a good idea in a newbie game when before you completely wrote it off as something that just hid scum?
In post 114, hiplop wrote:this charter idea is terrible. the core problem is that its punishing anti-town, rather than scum. Bad players have just as much chance of being scum or town
If "bad players" and "good players" have an equal chance of being scum, why wouldn't you want to lynch the bad players first?

If we punish anti-town to the point where they are forced to be pro-town, what is the problem?
worse than random
User avatar
Porkens
Porkens
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Porkens
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9700
Joined: June 20, 2008

Post Post #118 (ISO) » Thu Feb 27, 2014 5:55 pm

Post by Porkens »

In post 116, Hadrian wrote:Don't you think you're jumping the gun there, hoss? By my time settings, the last user post was 5:28, and the daystart pm wasn't until 6:21.
5:28 today, right?
worse than random
User avatar
morph the cat
morph the cat
Sync Achieved
User avatar
User avatar
morph the cat
Sync Achieved
Sync Achieved
Posts: 8828
Joined: July 14, 2013

Post Post #119 (ISO) » Thu Feb 27, 2014 5:57 pm

Post by morph the cat »

In post 116, Hadrian wrote:Don't you think you're jumping the gun there, hoss? By my time settings, the last user post was 5:28, and the daystart pm wasn't until 6:21.
Note the dates. PM was sent the 26th, he's posted on the 27th.
User avatar
Hadrian
Hadrian
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Hadrian
Goon
Goon
Posts: 341
Joined: December 28, 2013

Post Post #120 (ISO) » Thu Feb 27, 2014 5:58 pm

Post by Hadrian »

OH...never mind carry one.

Thursday's I work a near 13 hour day. Yeah, let's go with that.
User avatar
Porkens
Porkens
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Porkens
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9700
Joined: June 20, 2008

Post Post #121 (ISO) » Thu Feb 27, 2014 5:59 pm

Post by Porkens »

In post 41, HighShroomish wrote:Two pages already. Damn. On the subject of the charter- uhhh no. It gives scum a chance to sign up to survive much longer. Simply by signing up, they are gauranteed safety among the members. How could you not see that the moment you drafted the charter, specifically the lynch-list.
Something about this bugs me.
Did you think I was scummy or tiny when you wrote this?
worse than random
User avatar
Hadrian
Hadrian
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Hadrian
Goon
Goon
Posts: 341
Joined: December 28, 2013

Post Post #122 (ISO) » Thu Feb 27, 2014 6:08 pm

Post by Hadrian »

In post 98, morph the cat wrote:That was cabd's post. I'll answer from my perspective. It's an invitation for him to step his game up this time out.
Well cabd is online now, what is it from his perspective?
User avatar
morph the cat
morph the cat
Sync Achieved
User avatar
User avatar
morph the cat
Sync Achieved
Sync Achieved
Posts: 8828
Joined: July 14, 2013

Post Post #123 (ISO) » Thu Feb 27, 2014 6:12 pm

Post by morph the cat »

In post 122, Hadrian wrote:
In post 98, morph the cat wrote:That was cabd's post. I'll answer from my perspective. It's an invitation for him to step his game up this time out.
Well cabd is online now, what is it from his perspective?
The game most recently on my mind? I had kind of forgotten about syr's hard boiled game, but the absolute USELESSNESS of the town in Thad's game is still fresh in my head.
User avatar
Hadrian
Hadrian
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Hadrian
Goon
Goon
Posts: 341
Joined: December 28, 2013

Post Post #124 (ISO) » Thu Feb 27, 2014 6:16 pm

Post by Hadrian »

In post 123, morph the cat wrote:
In post 122, Hadrian wrote:
In post 98, morph the cat wrote:That was cabd's post. I'll answer from my perspective. It's an invitation for him to step his game up this time out.
Well cabd is online now, what is it from his perspective?
The game most recently on my mind? I had kind of forgotten about syr's hard boiled game, but the absolute USELESSNESS of the town in Thad's game is still fresh in my head.
Okay but do you have a read on him by this point?

I'm kinda leaning town based on what I remember of his meta in Zach's game. I'll need to go back and review what we went over there to be sure, but what I remember, or think I do, is that he makes much less confident stances as scum. So, his stance against Porkens and the original charter makes sense. His original tone threw me off, but I remember scum reading him in marketplace due to tone and being completely wrong because his playstyle has changed so much since Hard Boiled.
Locked