Mafiascum.net

Posted: **Wed Mar 12, 2014 6:02 am**

In post 73, Earthquake wrote:
In post 70, ChannelDelibird wrote:I'm not going to get involved in the Not_Mafia vote, by the way. Townread.
Why?

#59 rang true with a curiosity and purpose that I associate with being town.

Posted: **Wed Mar 12, 2014 6:05 am**

Protector's fairly heavy-handed alt-affectations are making getting a read on her more difficult than is helpful but I lean town at the moment.

Kid A, do you think that your vote is still in the right place?

Posted: **Wed Mar 12, 2014 6:08 am**

In post 80, Earthquake wrote:VOTE: Quill

I want to hear more from you and I feel our vote on Not_Mafia has reached its peak in terms of read gathering.

This is an extremely telegraphed post, as if you want us to look closely at how efficient you're trying to be, but in the process takes any oomph out of the vote. What kind of reaction did you expect to get out of Quill from something like this?

Posted: **Wed Mar 12, 2014 6:09 am**

As of #81/2, Egg is super town.

Posted: **Wed Mar 12, 2014 6:14 am**

In post 84, Quill wrote:
Zar wrote:So... Epiphanies of RVS votes turned serious don't sit well with me, actually. I find its easier for mafia-aligned players to find an excuse to not move their votes. Not really much of a fan of Lia's argument and move-out after Egg called her out.

(And yes, for those interested, I liked Channel's vote on Lia.)

Vote: Lia
I'll admit, I didn't notice this before. I also don't see the "by-play" that Lia says is him wanting to unvote, so that's another strike against her.

Unvote
Vote: Lia

Had some townpings from the rest of this post but this part doesn't sit particularly well with me. Looks too certain, too quickly, as a result of Zar's reasoning.

Posted: **Wed Mar 12, 2014 6:15 am**

In post 87, Lia wrote:2) CDB has responded to a couple of posts that were directed at Dritan before Dritan got to them.

Do you think that I am more likely to do that as scum than town? Why?

Posted: **Wed Mar 12, 2014 8:47 am**

I have a town read on CDB and Egg right now. I have a slighter town read on Not_Mafia based on 90. Add Earthquake to the townier side of the spectrum after a closer look at their minor exchange with Quill.

Aside from Lia, I'm currently leaning on suspicion towards Quill mostly because there's a significant amount of wiggle room in his stated opinions so far. In the surface, the posts seemed townish on a first skim, but looking at #66 and #84 more closely, I can see Earthquake's point about his comments.

Nothing on the rest of the slots so far.

chamber

why did you only comment on Protector's wagon?

Posted: **Wed Mar 12, 2014 10:18 am**

I wasn't only commenting on Protector's wagon?

Posted: **Wed Mar 12, 2014 10:43 am**

In post 95, Zar wrote:
Kid A

In post 75, Kid A wrote:because none of the other posts had words in them that made me want to respond with more words

In post 89, Kid A wrote:i wanted to respond to it =/= it was the only important thing to happen
I'm not following Kid A's logic. How exactly do you intend to say these two statements don't contradict each other?

If you thought none of the other posts made warranted a response from you, how is it that you think other important things happened so far? (at least this is what I'm understanding from your latter statement), and why if you think other important things happened, you didn't think these needed a response from you?

i dont understand how thinking a post is important and having something to say to the person who posted are linked

i think post x was a big towntell so its an important post but i dont feel any need to question poster x or quote it and go hey look at this towntell everyone

Posted: **Wed Mar 12, 2014 1:19 pm**

In post 94, Zar wrote:
In post 87, Lia wrote:Well, seeing as no epiphany was involved that shouldn't bother you then. The vote would have been moved whether or not Egg or anyone else said anything as there was no longer a reason to leave it there. Do you think there was?

What did you like about CDB's vote on me?
Possibly because you had
just
stated you thought the wagon was "serendipitous"... if you thought you were getting lucky with the vote where it was, why was there no longer a reason to leave it there?

(This is also the reason why I liked the momentum on CDB's vote on you...)

I explained in 49 why I left the vote there and why there was no longer a reason to leave it there. "Getting a little twinge" is not the same as having an epiphany.

What do you mean by "the momentum on CDB's vote"?

In post 105, ChannelDelibird wrote:Do you think that I am more likely to do that as scum than town? Why?

I don't know whether you would or not. But if I thought it was the former I would have voted you.

Vote: Zar

This is mainly gut.

Posted: **Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:57 pm**

In post 107, chamber wrote:I wasn't only commenting on Protector's wagon?

Okay, let me rephrase it better then: Aside from voting Quill him for

reasons

(??), why have you only commented on Protector's wagon?

In post 108, Kid A wrote:i dont understand how thinking a post is important and having something to say to the person who posted are linked.

i think post x was a big towntell so its an important post but i dont feel any need to question poster x or quote it and go hey look at this towntell everyone

Well, I don't understand how thinking a post is important and not saying anything is linked, either. Tomato, tomato? I don't get the need of being secretive of town reads. Whether you're using town-hunting to reduce the suspect pool or not, it still helps narrow down the suspects. Keeping them to yourself doesn't give us anything to get a read from you (Is that like the new fad in the site-wide meta these days?)

Posted: **Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:58 pm**

In post 109, Lia wrote: I explained in 49 why I left the vote there and why there was no longer a reason to leave it there. "Getting a little twinge" is not the same as having an epiphany.

What do you mean by "the momentum on CDB's vote"?

I'm taking you missed where I already had said I didn't like the reasoning you used to move the vote in the same post I voted you.

CDB's vote comes as a direct result of your 49, it's what I was referring to. When I read it, I had a similar reaction to that post... (although admittedly mine comes from different reasoning).

Posted: **Wed Mar 12, 2014 9:50 pm**

Unfortunately I'm going to have to

request replacement

due to unexpected circumstances. Sorry. Enjoy yourselves~

Posted: **Wed Mar 12, 2014 10:34 pm**

In post 110, Zar wrote:Okay, let me rephrase it better then: Aside from voting Quill him for reasons(??), why have you only commented on Protector's wagon?

The 2 things weren't unconnected. I comment on interesting things I see. The thread isn't that interesting.

Posted: **Thu Mar 13, 2014 12:11 am**

Edosurist has requested replacement.

Posted: **Thu Mar 13, 2014 5:05 am**

In post 109, Lia wrote:
In post 105, ChannelDelibird wrote:Do you think that I am more likely to do that as scum than town? Why?
I don't know whether you would or not. But if I thought it was the former I would have voted you.

If you have no inclination as to whether or not it is alignment-indicative, why did you bring it up?

Posted: **Thu Mar 13, 2014 5:09 am**

Code: Select all

 Egg  Mar 09, 05:23pm  Mar 11, 08:53pm  1 day 21 hours  13  
 Not_Mafia  Mar 09, 08:57pm  Mar 11, 08:28pm  1 day 22 hours  14  
 Quill  Mar 10, 07:11pm  Mar 11, 07:39pm  1 day 23 hours  3  
 Earthquake  Mar 09, 07:52pm  Mar 11, 05:55pm  2 days 0 hours  7  
 Formerfish  Mar 09, 07:40pm  Mar 11, 09:27am  2 days 9 hours  2  Mar 15 2014
 Dritan  Mar 09, 01:58pm  Mar 10, 01:52pm  3 days 4 hours  3

Guys.

I'm not satisfied with activity. at all.

Prodding Formerfish, Earthquake(both heads), Quill, Not_Mafia, Egg
Dritan has picked up his prod but not posted. If he doesn't post until I go to sleep I'm searching for replacement.
Searching for replacement for Edosurist.

.

GUYS BE ACTIVE

Posted: **Thu Mar 13, 2014 5:20 am**

Replace dodge.

Kid A's response was weak. He is activity posting.

Posted: **Thu Mar 13, 2014 5:27 am**

Back from V/LA tomorrow.

Posted: **Thu Mar 13, 2014 5:29 am**

In post 117, Not_Mafia wrote:Kid A's response was weak. He is activity posting.

Based on my limited (I think, admittedly, marathon-only) previous experience with Kid A, plus his general tone, I'm not convinced that his behaviour is alignment-indicative.

Posted: **Thu Mar 13, 2014 5:32 am**

Antihero replaces Edosurist effective immediately. Thanks!

Posted: **Thu Mar 13, 2014 5:50 am**

Hey,

Sorry for not posting. I wanted to see reactions to the Quill vote and lost track of time. I am surprised only Quill responded. I think my other head didn't post to give me space. Sorry.

Posted: **Thu Mar 13, 2014 5:51 am**

In post 121, Earthquake wrote:Hey,

Sorry for not posting. I wanted to see reactions to the Quill vote and lost track of time. I am surprised only Quill responded. I think my other head didn't post to give me space. Sorry.

hey,

if this is the non-titus head, please tell titus to screw "giving you space" and get in here

Posted: **Thu Mar 13, 2014 5:52 am**

VOTE: not_mafia

Posted: **Thu Mar 13, 2014 5:53 am**

In post 102, ChannelDelibird wrote:
In post 80, Earthquake wrote:VOTE: Quill

I want to hear more from you and I feel our vote on Not_Mafia has reached its peak in terms of read gathering.
This is an extremely telegraphed post, as if you want us to look closely at how efficient you're trying to be, but in the process takes any oomph out of the vote. What kind of reaction did you expect to get out of Quill from something like this?

I was looking to see reactions from other players. Total avoidance on the substance by most everyone wasn't what I expected.

Quill's first post ben a 3rd on a sheep wagon didn't feel righ an I felt not mafia was town, so I moved our vote.

Just what am I allegedly telegraphing?

Mafiascum.net

Open 551: Hard Boiled - GAME OVER