DragonsofSummer -2 (Glork, StallingChamp)
Pete D -2 (Amb, DragonsofSummer)
Amb- 1 (Omega)
Glork- 1 (blahgo)
7 to lynch.
This is so incredibly wrong, I'm not even sure I want to get into it. But meh, here goes.Amb wrote:On day 1 you can be lynched for having a name that reminds someone of Pi, or for by random chance being krolg spelt backwards. Even if the reasoning is "His voting pattern is scummy" or "He seems to have no backbone" you wont hit scum except by luck (Excepting if the scum says "Hey everybody, Im a serial killer, would you let me live as a vig").
My opinion on this hasn't changed, and whether Glork believes it or not I didn't even think about his "joke" FoS.DragonsofSummer wrote:I didn't actually even take your joke FoS into account on my vote Glork. I did a reread of the four pages and agreed with the evidence other people had put onto him, and since my vote was random I decided to put it somewhere it was more deserved.
These ideas click with me - agreeing with other people's bad logic doesn't sit well. IMHO, it's most likely that FA is town and Pete d is scum. If both were scum, pete d might have been more cautious about following FA, so as not to seem connected. If Pete d were town, he probably would have rejected the bad logic.Glork wrote:A) I find it odd that Pete D is accusing SC's posts of being scummy while leaving his (random) vote sitting around on DeanWinchester. Sometimes it's indicative of distancing, sometimes it's indicative of scum going after town, occasinally it's indicative of just bad pro-town play. When you move from "random" to "serious," you should almost always take your vote with you.
B) Pete let off one of my favorite scumtells that MeMe taught me way back in the day. Proposing or taking a bad stance (such as the one FA is taking, I feel) may or may not be scummy. Following someone else's lead on a bad stance (Pete not only agreeing with FA, but attacking SC for his response) is usually scummy.
C) I feel that, as SC pointed out, Pete overstated the "scumminess" of the proxy by calling it "distracting" and "confusing." Distracting from what? Random-Voting? What exactly is confusing about it?
Pete is pinging. Major hard.
I think that if I were scum, I would have done this less abrasively, so as not to arouse suspicion.DragonsofSummer wrote:Mod I'm voting Pete D right now
Have you been reading there posts? Dos has so many votes on him because of how scumie everything he post's is.Frozen Atlantic wrote: but um... yeah, I seriously don't like using the "reasons everyone else said" vote when there is a dearth of good reasoning.[/b]