Mariyta wrote:Vote Sarcastro
He's always scum. It's a proven fact.
What am I? = (
Fircoal wrote:Look at the bolded part. Ethers says that she is not comfortable with the bandwagon of me. Yet, she thinks that trying to find scum, and starting with the scummiest is scummy. I know it's a different point of view, but I don't think she as considered that I thought he was scummier. And worse she votes the bandwagon she thought was scummy. On that reasoning. Then it looks like she gives out a hint to me. Which, confuses me, because why would town, give out hints to supposed scum? Fos: Ether
I'd like to point out that this is wrong. She felt their votes were off, but you attacked Sarc, whose vote was completely legitimate.
Fircoal, why do you think Sarc is scummy for starting a bandwagon? That's, well, the least scummiest part of a bandwagon, the person who starts it, unless it's like for some crap reason and they're continually pushing for said person's lynch. I don't think Sarc has done that.
FoS:CES
(Especially since he's not the same CES I thought he was. Scum instead of sum, and no nibbler). First off I didn't like the bandwagons are for lynches. Second, he said he'd look over Ether's posts, but if he would have been paying attention to the game, he would have known that Ether had only made two posts (a confirm, and the one that voted Fircoal) which signifies to me he was looking for an easy wagon to hop on again.
Anix wrote:This is blasphemy, this is madness!
No, THIS. IS. THE RETURN OF MAFIASCUM AND THUS THE REBOOT OF THIS GAME!
THIS
IS
<.<
Can anyone remember anything from the crash that I would have missed in the posts that were lost?
unvote, Vote:CES
I think his explanation was more backpedaling to try and explain his vote and avoid some heat, as it came right after Sarc talking to Fircoal the difference between their two 'voting styles'.