Eyeceking wrote:Just to note - I don't like the plan Patrick has put forward either. My reasoning for this is that Eteocles could be scummy even with no counterclaim. It could be that this game doesn't have a cop and the communiques act in some sort of cop-esque manner or something. Hell, I don't know. These communiques could do anything. I'm just saying that sending all roles to one player of whom alignment cannot be determined? Not a good plan in my books.
What about if we had a confirmed innocent?
---
Miztef, your case against me makes no sense.
Miztef wrote:Those two lines really interested me. Patrick has confirmed cases of communiques and suggests the possible that communique's reveal information about dead people's roles, this was before muse's lee communique was discovered. If he has at least 2 confirmed communiques, it leads me to believe 1 was a death reveal and 1 from/to a mafia buddy. I believe the mafia has a death revealer and the citizens have 1 also (muse).
This is a massive stretch. You're simply assuming the very worst for this without justification. As a matter of fact, I have at least a couple of cases of a communique reaching it's correct destination in obvious ways: Firstly I messaged someone night 0 who replied, and secondly because I received a message today, addressed to me, and signed. Therefore, those communiques didn't go astray. Oh, and I believe it was Stoofer who first suggested that a dead player may be able to send one final message.
Miztef wrote:this was right after muse's communique was revealed. Patrick, who I'd say is very opinioned, only states "interesting" after such powerful news. I think he did not want to reveal that he also has that ability and so waited a while to carefully plan his reaction to it, based on other players.
(Shrug) I was thinking rather more about other things at that point. I have no death revealer ability of whatever you are trying to attach to me. It's not as if I was the only player to non comment on it straight away. If I was waiting to judge reactions, I wouldn't have posted that at all.
Miztef wrote:Patrick already dismisses the idea that Lee or another player sent the communique. This supports my idea of him being a death revealer, as he states that muse is lying or MeMe sent it, not the possibility that another player sent it.
And this is just BS. Read the context of the post. Simenon said that he was dismissing the idea that another player sent the message to muse. So I asked him which of the other two possibilities he thought was true. No assumptions made by me there.
Miztef wrote:In these quotes, I've bolded points where patrick uses the word "town". It strikes me as odd that he never uses "we" or "us" as the town, it's always "the town" or "was town". This leads me to believe he thinks of himself as outside of the "the town".
Laughable. Say you want to say you think someone is protown, what would you say -- "I think X is protown" or "I think X is with us or on my side"? Clearly it's perfectly natural to say it in the way I did. In other posts, I've also clearly used the words "we" or "us" when referring to the collective, and I find that pretty interchangable with "the town". So zero points again there I'm afraid.
Unvotem vote: Miztef.
Couldn't be clearer that you've tried to cook up a case there. If you want to sheep and just hop on with "Yeah I agree with Simenon/Stoofer, that's not great, but it would have been better than simply fabricating a case against me. You've placed a bunch of votes in this game and I can't remember one that actually made any sense.