Sorry. .HackerHuck wrote:Jordan, please try and include names in your quotes. I'm not sure who said what you posted above.
Mini 442 - Beast Wars Mafia Game Over
Forum rules
- JordanA24
- JordanA24
-
JordanA24
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2039
- Joined: April 29, 2007
- Location: Dirty old London
Please delete my comment from your sig...such an awful joke- Battle Mage
Politics Mafia currently requires 1 replacement, please PM me if interested.
WOW. Look who crawled out and suddenly is posting its Aimee. So a lurker wants some answers? That’s interesting…. but why not, I’ve got nothing to hide, so here’s my look on a few posters
Lowell: Post #32 was the first time I looked at Lowell and thought guilty, it was early in the game and he already wants to bandwagon a newbie to make him crack? That wasn’t trying to find scum that was trying to get a town lynch on somebody early on, THAN he apologizes and throws a vote at me because I called him out on his comment? Lowell than chimes in, in post 47 saying Hackhuck is town (definitely coming to somebody’s aid rather early) And now after your post he suddenly thinks you could be suspicious?
Hackerhuck: Became defensive right away with my random.org vote. Very strange to tell somebody they suck when the vote was RANDOM. I’ve always said that early posts tell a lot about how people play and immediately I saw this as strange how he misconstrued my vote. Than jumps on me because I didn’t like how Lowell bandwagon voted and says I’m not playing it “safe” like I earlier said? How is one vote on somebody not playing it safe? Post 64 asking me what I thought about the “bandwagon on me” also seemed rather odd.
Primoris post #84 saying he doesn’t want me to be sacrificed but is willing to do so to see if my “scum buddies unvote to save me” is strange indeed. Why you would take a chance putting a townie in a lynch? Seems like he took a chance to vote with one of his scum buddies and didn’t really get called out on it
Lowell and Hackerhuck still feel to me as though they are scum but I wouldn’t hesitate in voting Primoris either.
Lowell: Post #32 was the first time I looked at Lowell and thought guilty, it was early in the game and he already wants to bandwagon a newbie to make him crack? That wasn’t trying to find scum that was trying to get a town lynch on somebody early on, THAN he apologizes and throws a vote at me because I called him out on his comment? Lowell than chimes in, in post 47 saying Hackhuck is town (definitely coming to somebody’s aid rather early) And now after your post he suddenly thinks you could be suspicious?
Hackerhuck: Became defensive right away with my random.org vote. Very strange to tell somebody they suck when the vote was RANDOM. I’ve always said that early posts tell a lot about how people play and immediately I saw this as strange how he misconstrued my vote. Than jumps on me because I didn’t like how Lowell bandwagon voted and says I’m not playing it “safe” like I earlier said? How is one vote on somebody not playing it safe? Post 64 asking me what I thought about the “bandwagon on me” also seemed rather odd.
Primoris post #84 saying he doesn’t want me to be sacrificed but is willing to do so to see if my “scum buddies unvote to save me” is strange indeed. Why you would take a chance putting a townie in a lynch? Seems like he took a chance to vote with one of his scum buddies and didn’t really get called out on it
Lowell and Hackerhuck still feel to me as though they are scum but I wouldn’t hesitate in voting Primoris either.
[i]Please remove your head from your ass before you vote.[/i]
- Albert B. Rampage
- Albert B. Rampage
-
Albert B. Rampage
- Illogical Rampage
- Illogical Rampage
- Posts: 27261
- Joined: April 8, 2007
- Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Aimee wrote:Albert jumps in with another rhyme, and points suspicion at Lowell and Teffc, yet doesn’t explain why. The two posts he gives as reasons aren’t justifiable of any suspicion. Therefore why do you consider Teffc and Lowell to be the most suspicious?
"Mr. Rampage, can you please explain the meaning behind your violent lyrics?"
Explain tha meaning?? What tha f*** these **** talkin about...
JordanA24 wrote: As for my suspicions,Teffc hasn't made any posts other than a random vote and some blog like things rather than any meaningful conversation, this especially stood out for me:
morning, my computer crashed yesterday and i had to have it fixed...sorry i couldn't post earlier
there are a few persons i would like to see post.
so i'm sticking to my first choice, deezer.Is he making a few random/slightly helpful posts to try and make herself look more pro-town than she really is?
I'm keeping my vote avaliable at the moment but I'mFOS/IGMEOY:Teffc
Teffc wrote: Why the bold statement, HackerHuck? Seems to me you are trying to get someone's attention with that. Is there any particular reason for it? Being immune to investigations sounds like a good reason for saying it.
@ Lowell
HH suspects you and all you can reply is
Good post. This guy is town.Feeling safe he is not voting for you?
fosHackerHuck andLowell
My attitude is sh*tty, my message to the censorship comity
Who's tha biggest gang of mafia in the city?
The courts are the crooks
Take a closer look
Gotta watch your back, strapped
Real scum laugh back
If you get your ass taxed, swing your gat back
Who's tha biggest gang of mafia in the city?
The courts are the crooks
Take a closer look
Gotta watch your back, strapped
Real scum laugh back
If you get your ass taxed, swing your gat back
Unvote
Guard your honor. Let your reputation fall where it will. And outlive the bastards.
- JordanA24
- JordanA24
-
JordanA24
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2039
- Joined: April 29, 2007
- Location: Dirty old London
Are you saying that me and Teffc are scum, or just Teffc?Albert B. Rampage wrote:Aimee wrote:Albert jumps in with another rhyme, and points suspicion at Lowell and Teffc, yet doesn’t explain why. The two posts he gives as reasons aren’t justifiable of any suspicion. Therefore why do you consider Teffc and Lowell to be the most suspicious?
"Mr. Rampage, can you please explain the meaning behind your violent lyrics?"
Explain tha meaning?? What tha f*** these **** talkin about...
JordanA24 wrote: As for my suspicions,Teffc hasn't made any posts other than a random vote and some blog like things rather than any meaningful conversation, this especially stood out for me:
morning, my computer crashed yesterday and i had to have it fixed...sorry i couldn't post earlier
there are a few persons i would like to see post.
so i'm sticking to my first choice, deezer.Is he making a few random/slightly helpful posts to try and make herself look more pro-town than she really is?
I'm keeping my vote avaliable at the moment but I'mFOS/IGMEOY:TeffcTeffc wrote: Why the bold statement, HackerHuck? Seems to me you are trying to get someone's attention with that. Is there any particular reason for it? Being immune to investigations sounds like a good reason for saying it.
@ Lowell
HH suspects you and all you can reply is
Good post. This guy is town.Feeling safe he is not voting for you?
fosHackerHuck andLowellMy attitude is sh*tty, my message to the censorship comity
Who's tha biggest gang of mafia in the city?
The courts are the crooks
Take a closer look
Gotta watch your back, strapped
Real scum laugh back
If you get your ass taxed, swing your gat back
Unvote
The rhymes are great, but you make it a bit clearer what you mean, unless your posting restriction doesn't allow it.
Please delete my comment from your sig...such an awful joke- Battle Mage
Politics Mafia currently requires 1 replacement, please PM me if interested.
- TrustGossip
- TrustGossip
-
TrustGossip
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 401
- Joined: April 30, 2007
- Location: Connecticut
I have just been hired for a summer job, so I've been busy doing screenings, interviews, licensing, consulting and et. cetera. Also, as my first game with 12, I
Please give me 15 minutes to process five pages of banter, if I don't respond then I am worthy of your suspicion.
am
a bit overwhelmed.Please give me 15 minutes to process five pages of banter, if I don't respond then I am worthy of your suspicion.
Compcrack
Basically crack.
Basically crack.
Sounds fair to me 8)TrustGossip wrote:I have just been hired for a summer job, so I've been busy doing screenings, interviews, licensing, consulting and et. cetera. Also, as my first game with 12, Iama bit overwhelmed.
Please give me 15 minutes to process five pages of banter,if I don't respond then I am worthy of your suspicion.
[i]Please remove your head from your ass before you vote.[/i]
- TrustGossip
- TrustGossip
-
TrustGossip
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 401
- Joined: April 30, 2007
- Location: Connecticut
Ok.
Primoris, your L-2 on ryan was very unwise when there were four (five?!) lurkers at that time. And for what?
Ryan has been very talkative, explained his interpretation of the reason for voting, explained his theories on multiple people. Isn't that the reason for bandwagoning? To mine information from a particular player? And ryan has done all of this, and everything a bandwagon could accomplish short of a total crack or a nameclaim.
I have some problems with teffc and ryan both insisting on Hackerhuck and Lowell being scum. That's tying them together through nameplanting, and although I see your reasons for suspecting Lowell, I fail to see what's suspicious about Hackerhuck.
teffc in particular worries me with phrases like, "too clean", "too safe", "not enough evidence". Well duh on the evidence, we still have two lurkers that have done next to nothing in this game.
Jordan and Albert seem safest to me. Although Albert was somewhat cryptic in the beginning, he's opened up quite a lot with his (I'm assuming) post-restriction. I especially agree with post 85, which is essentially my first paragraph.
aimee, time will tell. I know you had finals and your summary was very helpful, but long summaries with commentary can be a scum tactic to shift suspicions and et. cetera. You're still neutral to me though, leaning towards town.
Hackerhuck I'd like to see more information come out of you. You seem very town ATM but I'd definitely like to see more contribution, maybe you'd need a wagon on you to talk...?
I agree with aimee's assessment that teffc is the scummiest. Posting for the sake of posting and not helping in the investigation, obsfucating ryan's actual intentions and actually contributing on the wagon on him since he seems to agree with HH and lowell as scum. Unless you're both scum playing a game of good cop/bad cop extremely ineptly, I'd say I have a reason to suspect you.
lowell, I had some suspicion about you at the beginning, but now you've gone to lurking. Please don't let this be a scum tactic because it's really obvious (and it's kind of working, because I don't think you're that scummy really).
To the last two. Post already. Really, c'mon, it's page five.
Primoris, your L-2 on ryan was very unwise when there were four (five?!) lurkers at that time. And for what?
Ryan has been very talkative, explained his interpretation of the reason for voting, explained his theories on multiple people. Isn't that the reason for bandwagoning? To mine information from a particular player? And ryan has done all of this, and everything a bandwagon could accomplish short of a total crack or a nameclaim.
I have some problems with teffc and ryan both insisting on Hackerhuck and Lowell being scum. That's tying them together through nameplanting, and although I see your reasons for suspecting Lowell, I fail to see what's suspicious about Hackerhuck.
teffc in particular worries me with phrases like, "too clean", "too safe", "not enough evidence". Well duh on the evidence, we still have two lurkers that have done next to nothing in this game.
Jordan and Albert seem safest to me. Although Albert was somewhat cryptic in the beginning, he's opened up quite a lot with his (I'm assuming) post-restriction. I especially agree with post 85, which is essentially my first paragraph.
aimee, time will tell. I know you had finals and your summary was very helpful, but long summaries with commentary can be a scum tactic to shift suspicions and et. cetera. You're still neutral to me though, leaning towards town.
Hackerhuck I'd like to see more information come out of you. You seem very town ATM but I'd definitely like to see more contribution, maybe you'd need a wagon on you to talk...?
I agree with aimee's assessment that teffc is the scummiest. Posting for the sake of posting and not helping in the investigation, obsfucating ryan's actual intentions and actually contributing on the wagon on him since he seems to agree with HH and lowell as scum. Unless you're both scum playing a game of good cop/bad cop extremely ineptly, I'd say I have a reason to suspect you.
lowell, I had some suspicion about you at the beginning, but now you've gone to lurking. Please don't let this be a scum tactic because it's really obvious (and it's kind of working, because I don't think you're that scummy really).
To the last two. Post already. Really, c'mon, it's page five.
Unvote: Vote teffc
FOS: Primoris, lowell
FOS: Primoris, lowell
Compcrack
Basically crack.
Basically crack.
- JordanA24
- JordanA24
-
JordanA24
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2039
- Joined: April 29, 2007
- Location: Dirty old London
Thanks Aimee.
Please delete my comment from your sig...such an awful joke- Battle Mage
Politics Mafia currently requires 1 replacement, please PM me if interested.
- chaotic_diablo
- chaotic_diablo
-
chaotic_diablo
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2134
- Joined: September 15, 2003
- Location: Sidewalk
Vote Count 4 for Day One
Lowell (2) : OvertheUnder, ryan
ryan (4) : deezr, Lowell, HackerHuck, Primoris
teffc (1) : TrustGossip
Not Voting (5) : Ripley, JordanA24, Teffc, Aimee, Albert B. Rampage
Not Voting (5) : Ripley, JordanA24, Teffc, Aimee, Albert B. Rampage
Remember, it's 7 to lynch.
"Miracles of Science" or "Freaks of Nature"?
Carp Logic. I'm so totally using that at some point.~ Mr. Flay
Carp Logic. I'm so totally using that at some point.~ Mr. Flay
- Albert B. Rampage
- Albert B. Rampage
-
Albert B. Rampage
- Illogical Rampage
- Illogical Rampage
- Posts: 27261
- Joined: April 8, 2007
- Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
- JordanA24
- JordanA24
-
JordanA24
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2039
- Joined: April 29, 2007
- Location: Dirty old London
So far, I see our main suspects as Teffc and Lowell.
For starters both haven't posted on this page at all, that's 2 days, although they haven't posted anywhere else either. But I still want to see a bit more defense, especially from Lowell. Teffc's last post said that she didn't suspect Ryan, and that sometimes mafia act so protown they are never suspected. (Pointing towards HH maybe?) I don't see anything hugely wrong with that.
But Lowell's last post I really didn't like:
Teffc's posting patterns up to this point, I think indicate newbie scum or a power role, but Lowell has just acted like scum to me. In fact, I'm so sure, I'm going to
And I've still got my eye on Primoris as well, but I think he's more future lynch material than a Day 1 lynch so far.
For starters both haven't posted on this page at all, that's 2 days, although they haven't posted anywhere else either. But I still want to see a bit more defense, especially from Lowell. Teffc's last post said that she didn't suspect Ryan, and that sometimes mafia act so protown they are never suspected. (Pointing towards HH maybe?) I don't see anything hugely wrong with that.
But Lowell's last post I really didn't like:
What's wrong with a summary of the game, particularly one as useful and correct as that one? What doubts I already had about him have now been amplified by that.Lowell wrote:That summary of Aimee's makes me weirdly suspcious, but I'm not sure why. M'eh.
Teffc's posting patterns up to this point, I think indicate newbie scum or a power role, but Lowell has just acted like scum to me. In fact, I'm so sure, I'm going to
Vote:Lowell
, and give Teffc an FOS
. And I've still got my eye on Primoris as well, but I think he's more future lynch material than a Day 1 lynch so far.
Please delete my comment from your sig...such an awful joke- Battle Mage
Politics Mafia currently requires 1 replacement, please PM me if interested.
- JordanA24
- JordanA24
-
JordanA24
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2039
- Joined: April 29, 2007
- Location: Dirty old London
I suggest everyone who's voting Ryan unvote him and put it somewhere decent, he clearly isn't the best lynch for today.
Please delete my comment from your sig...such an awful joke- Battle Mage
Politics Mafia currently requires 1 replacement, please PM me if interested.
- JordanA24
- JordanA24
-
JordanA24
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2039
- Joined: April 29, 2007
- Location: Dirty old London
Lowell (Post 114).ryan wrote:Where are you putting your vote at Jordan?
Please delete my comment from your sig...such an awful joke- Battle Mage
Politics Mafia currently requires 1 replacement, please PM me if interested.
- HackerHuck
- HackerHuck
-
HackerHuck
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2830
- Joined: July 26, 2006
- Location: On the outskirts of Vancouver
- JordanA24
- JordanA24
-
JordanA24
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2039
- Joined: April 29, 2007
- Location: Dirty old London
Well, Ryan's bandwagon was mostly because people had a slight suspicion about his safe voting tactics, and some cited not voting Lowell even though he was sure as a reason EVEN THOUGH HE DID VOTE LOWELL.
Also, apart from deezr's random vote, Lowell, who is scum, was the first to vote for him for seemingly no reason at all. It seems obvious to me that either Lowell or Teffc are by far better lynches for today.
Also, apart from deezr's random vote, Lowell, who is scum, was the first to vote for him for seemingly no reason at all. It seems obvious to me that either Lowell or Teffc are by far better lynches for today.
Please delete my comment from your sig...such an awful joke- Battle Mage
Politics Mafia currently requires 1 replacement, please PM me if interested.
@Jordan- Okay, okay, we get it. You're upset that we're trying to lynch your scumbuddy. Sheesh.
Seriously, you're trying to present a "most likely" scenario that doesn't include ryan, just cuz you *wubs* him too much? Does that, like, EVER work?
Ryan today, Jordan tomorrow, celebratory wine and cheese for all after.
Seriously, you're trying to present a "most likely" scenario that doesn't include ryan, just cuz you *wubs* him too much? Does that, like, EVER work?
Ryan today, Jordan tomorrow, celebratory wine and cheese for all after.
^^^ Lowell that was as useless of a post as you've posted in awhile now. I definetly feel much better about my vote now, you are definetly scum and you show it by not helping us find the scum. Seriously what does that post tell us? That you're mad because Jordan stood up to you? You are mad that I voted you? Or you feel as though you are going to be killed and it's a last dash effort to save your own backside by throwing out my name and Jordan's and saying we are scum together?
I mean going back to your last post before that masterpiece was post #99 throwing suspicion at Aimee due to her summary because it made you "weirdly suspicious" And your post before that #47 was this gem
And after I called you out for "Bandwagoning a newbie to make him crack" (your words in post 32) you immediately turned defensive and voted me without any solid reasons
I mean going back to your last post before that masterpiece was post #99 throwing suspicion at Aimee due to her summary because it made you "weirdly suspicious" And your post before that #47 was this gem
Am I the only one watching you "lurk" thru this entire game?Lowell wrote:Good post. This guy is town.HackerHuck wrote:I personally like to see who jumps on and off of wagons on day one.
Plays it safe but feels that Lowell is guilty?
Vote: Ryan
And after I called you out for "Bandwagoning a newbie to make him crack" (your words in post 32) you immediately turned defensive and voted me without any solid reasons
Folks, the evidence couldn't get much easier than this. Lowell is our scum, plain and simple.Lowell wrote:My apologies. That bandwagon was totally unnecessary.ryan wrote:WHY would you bandwagon a potential townie? I'm not sure I like your tacticsLowell wrote:unvote, vote Trustgosspto bandwagon a newbie and make him crack.
How's this, just tell us your scumbuddies and I'll let you live.unvote, vote ryan. FEEEAAR me...
[i]Please remove your head from your ass before you vote.[/i]