Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2016 7:41 am
I unvoted my vote so you should take it up with whoever still has you voted for.
What did your test reveal?In post 41, Creature wrote:It's a reaction test, I don't want to wait something happen in this boring RVS.
NopeIn post 42, Dwlee99 wrote:Cakey are you scum?
rofl if this is trueIn post 44, Creature wrote:tojam2 noticed he got a scum PM with so few newbies around and ran away.
rofl x 2In post 57, Dwlee99 wrote:Checking his profile and seeing his age I wouldn't be surprised if he got grounded or something similar.
Nothing more to say then this?In post 62, eagerSnake wrote:Hello all
This feels kind of icky, not sure why.In post 83, tojam2 wrote:PLEASE DONT PROD ME!
Sorry, I'm really tired right now as I've just got back from a shooting competition (and no I didn't win any medals).
Hi, I'm Tom and I'm the IC (Inexperience Challenger) for this game.
My job is to make sure that you learn how to play the game and the dynamics of the game mafia (hopefully without sounding too much like a smart-arse).
I am usually active around 3-4pm GMT and available to answer most questions you have.
Once, again I apologise for having been away for 2 days (ish).
I think this is blatantly newbtown.In post 86, eagerSnake wrote:How do we find out who is sdum?
I understand, being scum is tiring.In post 83, tojam2 wrote: Sorry, I'm really tired right now as I've just got back from a shooting competition (and no I didn't win any medals).
Because the vote's intention was to get a reaction and when that intention was out in the open, the vote served no purpose.
You could have kept the vote on and said you got a scummy reaction as an added layer. You didn't want to create too much Wifom is that why you didn't to that? What did atms reaction tell you? Obviously it looks like you are saying you think they gave a Townie reaction or you would have kept the vote on them correct?In post 118, crazycrabman wrote:Because the vote's intention was to get a reaction and when that intention was out in the open, the vote served no purpose.
I stated my intentions before I could get a reaction. A scum player, once seeing the intention of the vote, would act differently than if the intention was not known. That being said, a do find it a bit scummy that he kept pressing me about the vote, and even said he had three votes on him when in reality there was none.In post 122, LicketyQuickety wrote:You could have kept the vote on and said you got a scummy reaction as an added layer. You didn't want to create too much Wifom is that why you didn't to that? What did atms reaction tell you? Obviously it looks like you are saying you think they gave a Townie reaction or you would have kept the vote on them correct?In post 118, crazycrabman wrote:Because the vote's intention was to get a reaction and when that intention was out in the open, the vote served no purpose.
In post 99, atm487 wrote: to be fair, your right, but still, why not try someone else instead me, i have almost 3 votes on my now correct?