You certainly don't think this is enough to wrap up the game. If not bussing, then is this a reaction test?
It certainly was enough to wrap up the game if Meepo had been serious. But he later said he was joking.
I just get the impression that your motivation to tunnel was to keep up the bussing facade and not to find scum like town would.
I tunneled on Grace because I wasn't sure of her alignment yet. 13 and 16 may have been enough for you to determine her true colors, but it wasn't enough for me. People respond under pressure - that response shows me their alignment. Afterwards I townread Grace since her respond was townie.
Why would town OMGUS (post 80)?
Because I knew that RC's initial vote on me was just him playing games as usual, so I voted him back to show my displeasure. In addition, this was something of a placeholder vote, and after I completed my analysis I ended up voting Mizzy.
Why defend?
Because people were attacking him unreasonably and I wanted to put a stop to that.
And making people feel stupid like that isn't a reaction test how?
Please explain how my post made people feel stupid.
In the same post you also attack Mizzy, saying her post 30 is bad when 80% of it basically just looks like parroting of your own opinion earlier in the game
Indeed - just because someone is sheeping me doesn't mean that their posts are magically good.
How is anyone expected to strike the heart of someone at this point?
I don't expect Mizzy to strike at the heart of anyone. If she doesn't have something real to scumhunt, she be honest and say that she can't find any openings to question rather than trying to look good by jabbing aimlessly.
Why is jabbing and poking any different than what RC has done?
RC's meta isn't to jab and poke, it's to make naked votes and one liners or 20 pages and then jump on someone and deathtunnel them. In addition, I'm wary of trying to sort RC early because I find him difficult to read.
How do you differentiate between Mizzy appearing to look active and actually looking active at this point in the game?
I assume you meant actually "being" active here. My response is that the difference is the intent and direction of her questions. I don't see the pointedness and the "driving" that would lead me to believe she has a concrete idea of how each question helps to sort player alignments.
Since when does town ever ask someone to sheep them?
What is wrong with town asking someone to sheep them? To "sheep" someone means to follow their lead and vote who they vote - if a town member is confident they've found a good player to vote, they should want the rest of the town to vote with them.
again defending innocentvillager. This seems to be a reoccuring theme...
Of course I'm defending him. He's literally awol and people are rushing to jump down his throat.
Liking me is the obvious scum choice because I'm terrible at this game and obvious newb town.
Liking you is the obvious
town
choice, too. If you're obvious newb town, that means that I, as a town member, should want to read you as town.
This is besides the fact that I was voting meepo and not pushing either, but you like me?
I think you were doing this in a sort of clueless town way, rather than Mizzy's deceptive manner.
I would like to see a detailed explaination on why you think that post seems nowbie townie and meaningful...
You misunderstand. IV, in his post, questioned why I townread Meepo. I said that Meepo as a whole seemed genuine.
I think IV is your buddy. You immidiatly respond positivly and defend him again in 107 the moment he's under fire... What is that!
Why do you think that me defending IV means that we both have to be scum together? That's a ridiculous line of thinking. All town would defend another player who they feel to be unfairly attacked, which IV was. My actual read on IV is nullish, so anyone who reads him otherwise is either seeing something I don't(unlikely, since there's nothing much to see from 1 post and some V/LA declarations) or outright wrong.
In Conclusion
I feel that your erroneous scum read on me is due to a number of misunderstandings about my play and horrible misconceptions about how town should react. Your logic and hasty pre-flip associatives are bad and do not hold in the face of closer examination. You also seem to fundamentally misunderstand the point of many of my posts, like declaring them to be reaction tests when they're anything but. In the light of this, there can be no further reason to suspect I am scum.
