Page 5 of 83

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 6:07 pm
by atm487
Well other than a slight(EMPASIS ON SLIGHT) scum read on Robb, I can't think on who to vote for

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 6:56 pm
by crazycrabman
In post 59, atm487 wrote:VOTE: Crazycrab sheep
Sheep?

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 7:26 pm
by MarioManiac4
five pages already. why do you do this to me mafiascum

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 7:34 pm
by MarioManiac4
In post 100, atm487 wrote:Well other than a slight(EMPASIS ON SLIGHT) scum read on Robb, I can't think on who to vote for
I was going to vote for atm based on Page 3 but his recent posts are much better, so this is where I'm at right now.

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 8:56 pm
by atm487
thanks

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 11:07 pm
by F-oh-ex
Waking up to 5 pages, typical European scummer stuff.
Aaaaaand they're mostly shitposting, w-w-wow.

Favourite dessert is neapolitan ice cream btw.

VOTE: Stelo Welcome, possible fellow European.

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 12:20 am
by Robbnva
In post 103, MarioManiac4 wrote:
In post 100, atm487 wrote:Well other than a slight(EMPASIS ON SLIGHT) scum read on Robb, I can't think on who to vote for
I was going to vote for atm based on Page 3 but his recent posts are much better, so this is where I'm at right now.
They are? Which ones cause I haven't seen any plus I basically asked his opinions on things and he ignored the request.

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 12:30 am
by Robbnva
vote: atm

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 1:18 am
by Robbnva
In post 105, F-oh-ex wrote:Aaaaaand they're mostly shitposting, w-w-wow.
Not sure how you can say it's mostly shit posting. Lots of game discussion has taken place in the past 2/3 pages.
What's your opinion on these discussions? The serious votes on me, the serious vote on creature, the refusal to give opinions on those 2 things by atm?

Any thoughts at all?

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 1:18 am
by Robbnva
Also why the vote on stelo?

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 1:25 am
by Derek12
VOTE: F-oh-ex

Rob pretty much said what I was thinking, we're out of RVS and the shitposting comment seems like an excuse for not posting real content.

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 1:34 am
by Dwlee99
See you
could
vote fox or you could vote eggman.

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 1:35 am
by Dwlee99
Actually yea fox's post was garbage feel free to vote that.

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 1:35 am
by Derek12
Yeah Eggman's post was pretty bad but at least he has the excuse of it being 36 posts in

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 1:37 am
by Dwlee99
We'll see where these take us. For now Im sticking with eggman.

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 1:53 am
by Sméagol
V
o
t
e
c
o
u
n
t
Day 1 #02

Creature [
2
]:
Eggman
/
Smithereens

Robbnva [
1
]:
Creature

Dwlee99 [
1
]:
Dragon of the West

stelo [
1
]:
F-oh-ex

F-oh-ex [
1
]:
Derek12

Eggman [
1
]:
Dwlee99

atm487 [
1
]:
Robbnva

Abstaining [5]:
MarioManiac4 / stelo / Akigoku / crazycrabman /
atm487


There are 13 active players.
Absolute majority is
7
.
Majority has
not
been reached.

Previous vote count
Next vote count

Spoiler: Current player list
[01]
Smithereens

[02]
Creature

[03]
MarioManiac4

[04]
Robbnva

[05]
Dwlee99

[06]
stelo

[07]
Dragon of the West

[08]
Derek12

[09]
Akigoku

[10]
F-oh-ex

[11]
Eggman

[12]
atm487

[13]
crazycrabman

Spoiler: Days & nights

Deadline is
07-07-2016 00:00:00 CEST
((expired on 2016-07-07 00:00:00)).

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 2:52 am
by F-oh-ex
In post 109, Robbnva wrote:Also why the vote on stelo?
As far as I see it, we're still in RVS, I voted one of the two people who haven't posted yet.
In post 113, Derek12 wrote:Yeah Eggman's post was pretty bad but at least he has the excuse of it being 36 posts in
Yes, my post was so garbage because I RLed a lurker in my first post of the game while you were all shitposting for 4 pages. *claps slowly*

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 2:54 am
by F-oh-ex
In post 108, Robbnva wrote:
In post 105, F-oh-ex wrote:Aaaaaand they're mostly shitposting, w-w-wow.
Not sure how you can say it's mostly shit posting. Lots of game discussion has taken place in the past 2/3 pages.
What's your opinion on these discussions? The serious votes on me, the serious vote on creature, the refusal to give opinions on those 2 things by atm?

Any thoughts at all?
Let me read it 2-3 times and I'll present my opinion. I'd rather not form a serious opinion on spot after one read if I weren't there while the discussion was happening at all. When I am forced to catch up (and I often am due to time zones), I prefer to take a few horus to read everything carefully a few times.

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 2:57 am
by Dwlee99
In post 116, F-oh-ex wrote:Yes, my post was so garbage because I RLed a lurker in my first post of the game while you were all shitposting for 4 pages. *claps slowly*
wtf
You think that we're still in rvs and all of that was shit posting? What

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 2:57 am
by Dwlee99
Idiot tell not scum tell?

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 3:01 am
by Robbnva
In post 116, F-oh-ex wrote:As far as I see it, we're still in RVS, I voted one of the two people who haven't posted yet.
game was out of rvs by page 2

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 3:02 am
by F-oh-ex
Jsyk, this
is
my first game outside of Road to Rome. Go ahead, be a condescending prick and call me an idiot.

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 3:03 am
by Dwlee99
>_>

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 3:05 am
by F-oh-ex
In post 120, Robbnva wrote:
In post 116, F-oh-ex wrote:As far as I see it, we're still in RVS, I voted one of the two people who haven't posted yet.
game was out of rvs by page 2
I must have missed #32 somehow. This is why I'd rather read the thread 2-3 times before I make any serious opinion.

So apparently I still suck with reading some things, pardon my noobness.

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 3:30 am
by F-oh-ex
In post 28, Robbnva wrote:Look at dwlee he's so town

I'm not scum but I definitely have issues with your play so far so you're definitely on my watch list.
"I'm not scum but...", wut.
In post 34, Derek12 wrote:So is Akigoku your top scumread
Not seeing how someone who hadn't made a post at that time (and still hasn't) can be the biggest scumread.
In post 41, Robbnva wrote:lol that's not AI cause that's easily faked. Try again?
Good point. (AI = Alignment Indicative, right?)
In post 51, Robbnva wrote:Can't determine if this activity is town or not. It's weird to me that anyone can have a page 2 town read though.
In my past games I'd form slight town reads earlier than scumreads, usually, but I guess everyone plays differently. Or I just haven't learnt to scumhunt that well.
In post 60, Smithereens wrote:First Thoughts: 'Damn 3 pages already this game is hella active'
*reads the game*
3 people engaged in small chat... :\


VOTE: Creature

I didn't think myself that his townreads were seriously stated. So either I'm misinterpreting or you're pulling a strawman. And I don't find early TRs scummy myself.
In post 70, Robbnva wrote:
In post 67, Dwlee99 wrote:So Robbnva agrees we are out of rvs yet..
  1. Has trashed those with town reads
  2. Has no scum reads
nice
Nobody really should have either at this point. It's too early to get strong reads
I don't think anyone presented any STRONG reads.
In post 78, atm487 wrote:
In post 73, Robbnva wrote:
In post 71, Dwlee99 wrote:So you dont have any reads on
anyone
?
Not even
a little
Where do you get that idea? Pretty sure I've stated mild suspicion on 2 people already.
can you name these two people? personally, I think its kinda of weird that you will just say "it is too early", i thought yea, maybe its too early but you can't just trash someone's reads and defend yourself. You need valid points on why so and so is not scum or town
Earlier you had said yourself you're not the one to judge early game... contradiction much?

Town points to Robbnva for #80.
In post 103, MarioManiac4 wrote:
In post 100, atm487 wrote:Well other than a slight(EMPASIS ON SLIGHT) scum read on Robb, I can't think on who to vote for
I was going to vote for atm based on Page 3 but his recent posts are much better, so this is where I'm at right now.
I fail to see that they did.