Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 6:07 pm
Well other than a slight(EMPASIS ON SLIGHT) scum read on Robb, I can't think on who to vote for
Sheep?
I was going to vote for atm based on Page 3 but his recent posts are much better, so this is where I'm at right now.In post 100, atm487 wrote:Well other than a slight(EMPASIS ON SLIGHT) scum read on Robb, I can't think on who to vote for
They are? Which ones cause I haven't seen any plus I basically asked his opinions on things and he ignored the request.In post 103, MarioManiac4 wrote:I was going to vote for atm based on Page 3 but his recent posts are much better, so this is where I'm at right now.In post 100, atm487 wrote:Well other than a slight(EMPASIS ON SLIGHT) scum read on Robb, I can't think on who to vote for
Not sure how you can say it's mostly shit posting. Lots of game discussion has taken place in the past 2/3 pages.In post 105, F-oh-ex wrote:Aaaaaand they're mostly shitposting, w-w-wow.
As far as I see it, we're still in RVS, I voted one of the two people who haven't posted yet.In post 109, Robbnva wrote:Also why the vote on stelo?
Yes, my post was so garbage because I RLed a lurker in my first post of the game while you were all shitposting for 4 pages. *claps slowly*In post 113, Derek12 wrote:Yeah Eggman's post was pretty bad but at least he has the excuse of it being 36 posts in
Let me read it 2-3 times and I'll present my opinion. I'd rather not form a serious opinion on spot after one read if I weren't there while the discussion was happening at all. When I am forced to catch up (and I often am due to time zones), I prefer to take a few horus to read everything carefully a few times.In post 108, Robbnva wrote:Not sure how you can say it's mostly shit posting. Lots of game discussion has taken place in the past 2/3 pages.In post 105, F-oh-ex wrote:Aaaaaand they're mostly shitposting, w-w-wow.
What's your opinion on these discussions? The serious votes on me, the serious vote on creature, the refusal to give opinions on those 2 things by atm?
Any thoughts at all?
wtfIn post 116, F-oh-ex wrote:Yes, my post was so garbage because I RLed a lurker in my first post of the game while you were all shitposting for 4 pages. *claps slowly*
game was out of rvs by page 2In post 116, F-oh-ex wrote:As far as I see it, we're still in RVS, I voted one of the two people who haven't posted yet.
I must have missed #32 somehow. This is why I'd rather read the thread 2-3 times before I make any serious opinion.In post 120, Robbnva wrote:game was out of rvs by page 2In post 116, F-oh-ex wrote:As far as I see it, we're still in RVS, I voted one of the two people who haven't posted yet.
"I'm not scum but...", wut.In post 28, Robbnva wrote:Look at dwlee he's so town
I'm not scum but I definitely have issues with your play so far so you're definitely on my watch list.
Not seeing how someone who hadn't made a post at that time (and still hasn't) can be the biggest scumread.In post 34, Derek12 wrote:So is Akigoku your top scumread
Good point. (AI = Alignment Indicative, right?)In post 41, Robbnva wrote:lol that's not AI cause that's easily faked. Try again?
In my past games I'd form slight town reads earlier than scumreads, usually, but I guess everyone plays differently. Or I just haven't learnt to scumhunt that well.In post 51, Robbnva wrote:Can't determine if this activity is town or not. It's weird to me that anyone can have a page 2 town read though.
I don't think anyone presented any STRONG reads.In post 60, Smithereens wrote:First Thoughts: 'Damn 3 pages already this game is hella active'
*reads the game*
3 people engaged in small chat... :\
VOTE: Creature
I didn't think myself that his townreads were seriously stated. So either I'm misinterpreting or you're pulling a strawman. And I don't find early TRs scummy myself.
In post 70, Robbnva wrote:Nobody really should have either at this point. It's too early to get strong readsIn post 67, Dwlee99 wrote:So Robbnva agrees we are out of rvs yet..nice
- Has trashed those with town reads
- Has no scum reads
Earlier you had said yourself you're not the one to judge early game... contradiction much?In post 78, atm487 wrote:can you name these two people? personally, I think its kinda of weird that you will just say "it is too early", i thought yea, maybe its too early but you can't just trash someone's reads and defend yourself. You need valid points on why so and so is not scum or townIn post 73, Robbnva wrote:Where do you get that idea? Pretty sure I've stated mild suspicion on 2 people already.
I fail to see that they did.In post 103, MarioManiac4 wrote:I was going to vote for atm based on Page 3 but his recent posts are much better, so this is where I'm at right now.In post 100, atm487 wrote:Well other than a slight(EMPASIS ON SLIGHT) scum read on Robb, I can't think on who to vote for