Mafiascum.net

Luna Fox wrote:

In post 97, Transcend wrote:I think no one does and most likely i wasn't gonna actually get hammered. So your reaction to what kts said feels scummy.

So, because i questioned someone for wanting a quicklynch on someone im null-reading, im scum.
Because apparently that's easier to do than just not comment at all.

to me it read more like "i'm defending this slot that i know is town from getting flashwagoned" than "we shouldn't hammer right away".

In post 100, Transcend wrote:

Luna Fox wrote:

In post 97, Transcend wrote:I think no one does and most likely i wasn't gonna actually get hammered. So your reaction to what kts said feels scummy.

So, because i questioned someone for wanting a quicklynch on someone im null-reading, im scum.
Because apparently that's easier to do than just not comment at all.

to me it read more like "i'm defending this slot that i know is town from getting flashwagoned" than "we shouldn't hammer right away".

Well sure, but wouldnt it benefit a supposed scum me to not defend a town slot and watch it get quicklynched anyway?
Question to you:
Why wont Town me who doesnt know your and KTS alignment's see it as a questionable action?

1. I wasn't getting QH'd more likely than not. I think if you are scum and you didn't defend me it would look better on your persona honestly.

2. Why are you so defensive over a fos I have based on one thing? KTS is a seasoned player, I've played with him before. He's probably smart enough to not actually let me get flashwagoned. At most it was just overblown RVS and you white-knighting me looks forced. I personally didn't find his actions questionable and I'm not sure why you did.

In post 102, Transcend wrote:1. I wasn't getting QH'd more likely than not. I think if you are scum and you didn't defend me it would look better on your persona honestly.

2. Why are you so defensive over a fos I have based on one thing? KTS is a seasoned player, I've played with him before. He's probably smart enough to not actually let me get flashwagoned. At most it was just overblown RVS and you white-knighting me looks forced. I personally didn't find his actions questionable and I'm not sure why you did.

1. Yeah it would, and its more than likely what i've done as scum, but lol self-meta.

2. Because i form reads via interaction, i questioned your motives, i prodded you to see if they are genuine, idc how seasoned KTS is, or whether they'd actually go through with it, i questioned YOUR motives in your read of me. Because at initial gut it looks like scum looking for a quick swipe on town. Why should i be townreading you?

In post 31, Luna Fox wrote:

In post 28, Thor665 wrote:

In post 27, Io wrote:VOTE: Luna Fox
Clearly you're trying to defend your scum buddy by ignoring the votes placed upon him.

That logic would make Transcend scum - so why aren't you voting the larger wagon?

Also i like the logic thor portrays here.

Gross.

pedit: 1. k

2. i honestly don't think i should be townread yet.

In post 76, karnos wrote:Unless you think Thor & I are the sort of players who would bus each other day 1.

Io, is this and post #70 what lead you to believe that Karnos is adamant about Thor's lynch? If not, could you tell me what I missed?

Karnos, how are you reading Thor at the moment?

Honestly tho Transcend's logic is so far out there.
That i hardly believe they'd try to mislynch me with it.
So maybe they're prob town.

on that note: questionnaire time!!!

1. Do you get your reads typically from gut or evidence? 'I'm about half and half. I tend to have logic reads and I tend to have gut reads. It's fair to say I play with both. Gun to head the one I use a bit more would probably be evidence as opposed to my gut.

2. How would you describe your level of experience? Super experienced.

3. When trying to get a better read on a specific player, do prefer you reread the entire thread or just their ISO? I tend to just read the ISO.

4. What's your Myers-briggs personality type? Here's a link to a test for it if you don't know yours, but you can skip this one if you don't feel like wasting time.

I ask this because a lot of my scumhunting comes from putting myself into other player's shoes and using that to figure out their motives, so knowing how someone thinks is useful for that. I don't really know how successful this'll be but it's worth a shot!

Don't remember, don't care to take the test.

5. What's your opinion on Lynch All Liars? Lynch All Lurkers? Policy lynches in general? I'd be a damn hypocrite to support LAL because I lie as both alignments like no one's business. Be prepared.

6. Do you think it's a good idea to utilize all of the time allotted by a deadline? Nah. Honestly I like attaining information as fast as possible, obviously, when we have a plausible lynch.

7. Are you scum? There's no way I'm not answering yes to this question. So, yes.

In post 96, karnos wrote:

In post 89, Io wrote:

In post 84, karnos wrote:If you really think I was trying to argue that Thor & I actually are both scum, please just quick lynch me now, I don't want to be a part of this town.

But that's not what I was saying. I was saying you were claiming to want him lynched and claiming to have never pushed for his lynched at the same time.

I think you are lying. Didn't you say town doesn't have a good reason to lie in this setup?

"don't see a reason to really lie as town this game as there is no power roles to lie about"

Yes, you did.

VOTE: Io

I dont think they're necessarily lying, but i think they need to explain it better because i also dont know what they're referring to

Ooops I skipped part of Q5. Policy lynches are only good for pressure, I don't think someone should get lynched due to policy.

Speaking of Q5, do ppl even get policy lynched anymore? I thought that's why WotO and WotC exist ^^;;

Anyways due to Luna Fox's quote unquote buddying in multiple stages in the early game and her interrogation on me which feels somewhat fabricated, I'm happy with my vote here.

Oh, so now the argument is buddying, ok

You buddied Thor when his post was NAI and you buddied/defended me on a meatless bandwagon.

Plus you got super defensive over my super weak (not so weak anymore) initial fos.

Whatever floats your boat, but just because something is NAI to you, doesnt mean it should be NAI to me.
And i'd argue that questioning you about accusing me of something i hadn't done isnt "super defensive".

Touche. Not everyone is going to read the game the same way.

But I still fos you lol.

Ok, now, do you have any reads other than your fos on me.

not really other than io leans town

What do you think about Karnos 96 then.

In post 85, Tenshii wrote:@Thor At what post did you start townreading giga and why?

When he voted Karnos - because it was such a brilliant tryhard type early case, pinged as town.

I also townread Transcendence now - his Luna case is a laugh, but I townread him.

In post 86, tojam2 wrote:

@Thor665: Please use VOTE: tags from now on or I won't count your vote.

Aw cradsticks - fine, I'll try my best.
I loathe the creation of that tag becoming a mod ruleset occasionally.
Is it the auto counter? Does it not pick up on Bold tags or something? Or do you just love the highlight?

nothing at all other than his vote is probably wrong.

PEDIT: My luna case is srs bsns pls stop laughing at me.... (((

Laughter is the best medicine though.

True!!!!

In post 120, Transcend wrote:nothing at all other than his vote is probably wrong.

Are you srs.
He's boldly accusing your townread of lying.

Also I have no idea why, but everyone has a knack for mistyping my username.

PEDIT: i don't care if someone else foses my townread. like you said we're all gonna have different reads this game. his vote on io wasn't scummy to me, even though i think it's wrong.