Mafiascum.net

I only played 1 game with kill guys. We both don't understand how we play ._.

In post 92, Naomi-Tan wrote:whats a +1?

A +1 is someone you bring along to a party or event.

In post 100, Jordarrian wrote:I only played 1 game with kill guys. We both don't understand how we play ._.

i know perfectly well how you play. you've just never played a game with me where you understand what i do.

In post 95, xyzzy wrote:putting someone that close to dead when we're like 8(?) hours in is irresponsible because, like, what if someone comes in and says "hey haven't read the thread yet but here's my vote" and hammers him out of nowhere? like, they would immediately become suspicious, but it'd be the sort of thing that would still be possible to play off as a mistake.

he freaked out a lot at a relatively quick wagon, more than is reasonable for a wagon out of nowhere day 1. I dislike that reaction.

Seems reasonable, but I think the move would be WAY too high risk.

care to offer anything else, pistachi0n?

hey what's up

Hmm jordarrian and naomi are null-scum leaning but it's too early to pin them down, naomi more for the subtle white knighting and buddying than for 48. Would say the same of vedith but I know from experience he's a scummy scumbag even as town but IGMEOY

VOTE: xyzzy

creature's also possibly scum. will get back to you on that one.

Nah Naomi is p town.

they're prob town i agree, but their posting style annoys me. wouldn't mind a vig on them lol.

nah Naomi is cool

this just in kts and naomi are softclaimed masons

because i don't know how anyone could like the toxicity that is naomi

nah not mason, but Naomi is a cool person

regardless xyzzy should be a contender of rope

In post 107, light_ganski wrote:Hmm jordarrian and naomi are null-scum leaning but it's too early to pin them down, naomi more for the subtle white knighting and buddying than for 48. Would say the same of vedith but I know from experience he's a scummy scumbag even as town but IGMEOY

Erm.. It wasn't white knighting... no one was attacking you or being suspicious of you at the time and I missed the comments on page 1 about the day talk.. it was meant to be just a small little expansion so no one got confused.. If I had noticed page one was more than just RVS I wouldn't of spoken about it.. Like.. you can't really white knight something thats not even a thing yet..

In post 112, Transcend wrote:this just in kts and naomi are softclaimed masons

because i don't know how anyone could like the toxicity that is naomi

Why am I toxic..? I thought I was at least helping out.. but there isn't much to talk about right now..

I don't like your gimmick and the way you post.

In post 116, Transcend wrote:I don't like your gimmick and the way you post.

I don't think its really a gimmick.. but okay we can put this aside for now. As the game picks up hopefully you'll find me less gimmicky?

Fine

But I still find you annoying lol

BS'd list of reads so far

{KTS}
{Naomi}
{Jord, BlackStar}
{massive, pistachi0n, Skelda}
{Io}
{Vedith, light, Creature}
{xyzzy}

In post 119, Transcend wrote:BS'd list of reads so far

{KTS}
{Naomi}
{Jord, BlackStar}
{massive, pistachi0n, Skelda}
{Io}
{Vedith, light, Creature}
{xyzzy}

So Town to scum right ?

yea

is there a known ratio of mafia to town fwiw

In post 114, Transcend wrote:regardless xyzzy should be a contender of rope

and why is that? you've yet to meaningfully substantiate what about my play so far you dislike.

In post 14, xyzzy wrote:Killthestory, of the players who haven't posted yet, which is the scummiest? thanks

In post 93, xyzzy wrote:

In post 67, Vedith wrote:

In post 66, Naomi-Tan wrote:Why?

I have a day guilty on him...

can you confirm that you're being serious about this statement? BlackStar, what's your thoughts?

I don't like how Jordarrian responded to that wagon, but I'm definitely not putting someone at L-2 on page 4 because that would be irresponsible

In post 105, xyzzy wrote:care to offer anything else, pistachi0n?

posts like these don't sound genuine