Page 5 of 107
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:06 am
by Thor665
His usual reaction to claims of meta is to sound like a 5 year old and claim that meta is trash, and he can't be read by meta.
He happily went along with your read.
How does that play into his meta in your mind, and also please explain the meta that got you to town read him - I want to know how much to trust it as a read.
In post 78, MariaR wrote:Where the F did I say "I want to stay in RVS stage!" I'm saying we're still in it
RVS is subjective - some people can be in it and some out of it.
If you say you're out of it - why are you voting like you're in it?
I agree with Nero's question, your commentary lacks any logic.
In post 89, MariaR wrote:This is all cute and all you wanting me to explain my reasoning with a pressure vote because none of you scumread me I am null or townread simple your cheap try to get me to explain won't work if you unvote me I'll say why I made such a statement if not. I have nothing to say about it
Unvote: Blitzkrieg
Vote: MariaR
There, now the pressure that isn't pressure that you want gone before you answer anything is even less there.
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 1:10 am
by JarJarDrinks
In post 78, MariaR wrote:Jarjar made one post and it wasn't a joking post it was a chainsaw lynch post that was god awful
THIS wasn't a joke post?
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 1:16 am
by JarJarDrinks
Maria, explain your logic in scumreading me here. I see these posts by transcend and decide that I can get him lynched because people are gonna take this as a serious claim?
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 1:46 am
by Thor665
You should vote Maria, that way she can duck answering until you unvote.
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 1:48 am
by JarJarDrinks
I am voting maria
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 1:51 am
by Thor665
Good, I don't want her to have a chance to answer any questions prior to her lynch.
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 1:51 am
by karnos
VOTE: Shadow_step I don't like this new avatar.
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 1:51 am
by JarJarDrinks
In post 100, Thor665 wrote: In post 78, MariaR wrote:Where the F did I say "I want to stay in RVS stage!" I'm saying we're still in it
RVS is subjective - some people can be in it and some out of it.
Yeah I think this post clearly shows maria knows this:
In post 76, MariaR wrote:I've read every post Nero
this is still RVS stage for me
sorry I'm not matching up with your standards don't belittle me k thanks
Like the above post is clearly the answer to: Where the F did I say "I want to stay in RVS stage!"
She says it right there.
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 1:52 am
by JarJarDrinks
Townreading Thor and probably Nero. This is a good wagon.
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 1:55 am
by Thor665
Dude, game is going and there are actually two potentially sexy wagons to be on - why you sidelining instead of sheeping me?
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 2:00 am
by karnos
In post 109, Thor665 wrote:
Dude, game is going and there are actually two potentially sexy wagons to be on - why you sidelining instead of sheeping me?
I voted before I finished reading the thread, give me a moment or three.
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 2:05 am
by JarJarDrinks
In post 86, Transcend wrote:Shadow: Word to the wise, I never defended Blitzkrieg.
I said that the vote that Michel made on her was shit, and confronted him about it.
No the michel vote was only 1 thing you mentioned. And you didn't even talk about the michel vote right away. The first 2 posts where you "never defended" Blitzkrieg, you were seemingly responding to Thors vote:
See, no mention of michel.
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 2:12 am
by karnos
I'm convinced Thor is either town, or scum.
I don't like this refusal to explain from MariaR. Lets rope this.
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 2:13 am
by karnos
VOTE: MariaR
That is L-X, where X is some number I'm too lazy to calculate. If X is 1, please don't hammer carelessly!
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 2:23 am
by JarJarDrinks
If you do decide to show up and answer stuff...
In post 89, MariaR wrote:This is all cute and all you wanting me to explain my reasoning with a pressure vote because
none of you scumread me I am null or townread
simple your cheap try to get me to explain won't work if you unvote me I'll say why I made such a statement if not. I have nothing to say about it
Why don't you believe anyone scumreads you?
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 2:32 am
by chilledtea
In post 99, kraska77 wrote: In post 78, MariaR wrote:Where the F did I say "I want to stay in RVS stage!" I'm saying we're still in it
Michael's first posts have been a load of bs and feels like he's trying to get something rolling on town (ironic cause I'm doing the same thing)
Jarjar made one post and it wasn't a joking post it was a chainsaw lynch post that was god awful
jarjar's post doesnt look serious to me
idk about michael he could just be tryhard town
hot damn
VOTE: karnos and gerryoat come post ^_^
I am not counting this vote.
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 2:35 am
by chilledtea
MariaR (L-2) : Blitzkrieg, JarJarDrinks, MichelSableheart, Thor665, karnos.
MichelSableheart (L-4) : Elyse, MariaR, Transcend.
Transcend (L-5) : Nero Cain, Shadow_step.
Blitzkrieg (L-5) : I Am Innocent.
Not Voting (2) : gerryoat, kraska77.
Day will end in (expired on 2016-09-13 10:30:00)
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 2:46 am
by Thor665
In post 110, karnos wrote:I voted before I finished reading the thread, give me a moment or three.
Damn you and your eerie ability to peg me every time!
In post 112, karnos wrote:I don't like this refusal to explain from MariaR. Lets rope this.
The refusal to explain is your biggest issue with the slot?
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 2:49 am
by kraska77
In post 109, Thor665 wrote:Dude, game is going and there are actually two potentially sexy wagons to be on - why you sidelining instead of sheeping me?
which wagons? maria and michel?
both wagons suck
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 2:55 am
by Thor665
Why do both of them suck, and why are you not pushing a good wagon to combat the suck?
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 3:05 am
by Shadow_step
Did you roll scum kraska?
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 3:08 am
by kraska77
because everyone's posts seem to revolve around one or both of these 2 being scum so far
so everyone is posting similar content and i have nothing appreciable to say yet
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 3:12 am
by JarJarDrinks
In post 121, kraska77 wrote:because everyone's posts seem to revolve around one or both of these 2 being scum so farso everyone is posting similar content and i have nothing appreciable to say yet
nice non-answer.
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 3:16 am
by JarJarDrinks
If everyone's posting about how those 2 are scum, and you think the wagons suck, how do you not have more to say about the people on those wagons?
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 3:24 am
by kraska77
In post 123, JarJarDrinks wrote:If everyone's posting about how those 2 are scum, and you think the wagons suck, how do you not have more to say about the people on those wagons?
post 121 still answers this