Mini 544/Mars 4 - Keyboard Mafia - Mod Abandoned
Forum rules
- SeraphicMirth
- SeraphicMirth
-
SeraphicMirth
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 402
- Joined: June 13, 2007
- Location: Washington, USA; Oregonian at heart
Interesting point...not really sure if i agree, but..didn't really think of it that way before.
Also, I am amused that you talk in the 3rd person randomly.
I still don't really get how voting someone to clear up confusion about a name isn't really a random vote at the base of it. I mean, that can't be serious logic. Also, you yourself said it was a crappy reason for a lynch. So, your vote is still there...why?
So, it still does seem a little suspicious on your part.
ryanjunk: why just an FoS, rather than a vote?
Also, I am amused that you talk in the 3rd person randomly.
I still don't really get how voting someone to clear up confusion about a name isn't really a random vote at the base of it. I mean, that can't be serious logic. Also, you yourself said it was a crappy reason for a lynch. So, your vote is still there...why?
So, it still does seem a little suspicious on your part.
ryanjunk: why just an FoS, rather than a vote?
"One's mind, once stretched by a new idea, never regains its original dimensions." - Oliver Wendell Holmes
Peers has been known to speak in the first person when divulging information about himself; it helps him look at the information more objectively, and if something would make him look bad, he'll shut the hell up about it. Meta: If Peers is speaking in teh third person, he probably really means what he's saying (Witness other games where he says "You do not want to lynch Peers" or "Peers may be Mafia, but you, sir, are Wolf!")
And as I've said, it's not 'confusion about the name' so much as it is "He said it was his name first, but it wasn't, and he tried to start something about it".
And as I've said, it's not 'confusion about the name' so much as it is "He said it was his name first, but it wasn't, and he tried to start something about it".
Vote: Peers
It doesn't matter who's name was first. Whether it be first born with the name or first registered on the site with the name. It's not worth sitting here and debating. I started discussion with it, not "let's lynch him" I don't know what angle Peers is trying to pull but I'm fine with some pressure on him
[i]Please remove your head from your ass before you vote.[/i]
- kabenon007
- kabenon007
-
kabenon007
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1186
- Joined: April 19, 2007
- Location: Cannot be disclosed, as it would jeapordize my mission
- Medicated Lain
- Medicated Lain
-
Medicated Lain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 714
- Joined: December 2, 2002
- Location: Japan
- Contact:
It's hard to say whether you started them.. you were attacked for things that you were doing.. the point is more so that you continued them very strangely. To try to justify your vote against Ryan as non-random is the main reason I'm voting you. It's like saying "We have a valid reason to get rid of this person! it doesn't matter that there's just as equal a chance as anyone else in this game that they're scum, let's just get rid of this person to stop the confusion, and continue on tomorrow!"Peers wrote:But take note that Peers did not start either of the arguments he was in. That's rather like saying "You've been mugged twice this week? Well, you must be involved in something that makes you a target..."
Which, granted, I _could_ be a know drug dealer and I'm targeted for mugging because I've got cash and dope on me... but, y'know, odds are that I'm not.
I'm not saying that's what you said, just that that's what it translated to in my head, and that seems really scummy to me. I don't understand how the odds are on you that you're not scum, when you're doing suspicious things.
unvote
Still missing a fair portion of the town it seems, atleast their thoughts.Anyways I'm just wondering, for those who are talking but not voting for Peers, are you just waiting for other people to speak up before doing anything, or do you not find Peers suspicious anyone else seem suspicious?
Zeek I'm just curious what you meant by that?ZeekLTK wrote:Considering everything that's happened, I'm content with my vote on Peers.
It seems like he does have more information than he should at this point, which most likely means he's mafia.
liamcool, that would be the only one relavant post to the game you seem to have made so far.. just wondering what your thoughts are.liamcool wrote:I bet Escape and/or Delete is a mafia member (should Escape and/or Delete be in this game).
I very highly doubt that K has something to do with a post restriction, I'm thinking it's something more along the lines of protecting people or blocking people or something like that, but I don't know.
If you're not remembered, then you never existed.
- SeraphicMirth
- SeraphicMirth
-
SeraphicMirth
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 402
- Joined: June 13, 2007
- Location: Washington, USA; Oregonian at heart
Medicated Lain wrote:Anyways I'm just wondering, for those who are talking but not voting for Peers, are you just waiting for other people to speak up before doing anything, or do you not find Peers suspicious anyone else seem suspicious?
It's kind of a combo for me..I do like to see what other people think, but that doesn't necessarily make or break my vote. Also, I just ask questions usually before I vote, and I'm not sure how I feel on him with his answers. Hence, no vote.
Personally, it's tough as far as people seeming suspicious right now, since there hasn't been a whole lot going on. I plan to read through a couple times to see if I notice anything yet, but I can't promise that will yield any results or questions on my part.
Also, why did you unvote?
"One's mind, once stretched by a new idea, never regains its original dimensions." - Oliver Wendell Holmes
- Medicated Lain
- Medicated Lain
-
Medicated Lain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 714
- Joined: December 2, 2002
- Location: Japan
- Contact:
- kabenon007
- kabenon007
-
kabenon007
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1186
- Joined: April 19, 2007
- Location: Cannot be disclosed, as it would jeapordize my mission
Look at some of his posts:Medicated Lain wrote:Zeek I'm just curious what you meant by that?ZeekLTK wrote:Considering everything that's happened, I'm content with my vote on Peers.
It seems like he does have more information than he should at this point, which most likely means he's mafia.
We had a night phase - but nothing happened (for me at least), so what is there to go by other than the random voting stage that games normally start with?Peers wrote:Guys, we had a night phase. There's no reason to be random voting.
What is this comment even suppose to mean? It seems like something happened for Peers, or that he at least has some kind of information that he feels he doesn't need to randomly vote with (although I still fail to see how a vote for someone because they have the same name is anything but random).
This one Peers basically admits that he knows something we don't. And then he tries to backtrack saying he has a "hunch" (this is not consistent with ANYTHING he's said previously or afterwards though).Peers wrote:Yes, because the obvious way of looking at it is that I'm mafia. I should be lynched right away. Unless, of course, I'm not mafia. I could have an investigation power. Or, y'know, I could just have a hunch. Hunches are allowed, right? And they're not random.ryan wrote:And that's a good reason to vote somebody? That's the same thing as random voting Peers. There's no reason to say that junk is anymore town than I am, unless of course you know who's town and who's not because you are indeed mafia.
So either he's the WORST COP EVER (for revealing himself on DAY 1 - especially *without* revealing any investigations!) or he's mafia. Odds are higher that he's mafia.
This one, in the paragraph that starts with "So", he again basically admits that he has information ("there's other ways for me to have info"). He says (this is my summary) "yeah I have info but just because I do that doesn't automatically make me mafia, I could be a cop".Peers wrote:Wow... and I thought I tended to overreact.ryan wrote:Also for you to vote me AND bring up that you could have an investigative power is completely uncalled for. If you were a cop, you just basically outed yourself and if you aren't the cop, you're basically saying you investigated me and found scum (which you didn't since I'm not) Why are you trying to sway the game to follow you so early Peers?
So, when someone says "The only way you could have info on who is and isn't scum is if you're mafia", it's completely uncalled for for me to point out that you're wrong, there's other ways for me to have info... or I might not have info at all? Wow. How do I defend myself against a charge that I didn't need to defend myself?
And, tell me, ryan... where did I try to sway the game to follow me? I made a vote and gave a reason for it. You attacked me. I defended myself. No 'swaying' involved. I didn't even try to get other people to vote for you. I notice you didn't attack the other person voting for you. Just me. Why is that? You're not scumbuddies trying to lure someone into a trap, are you?
MOD: Fixed tags.
Again this is HORRIBLE if he really is the cop. So chances are he's NOT the cop. Again, if he's not the cop, and he has info, well, most likely he's mafia.
Again, like the "hunch" statement, at the end he throws in something saying "or I might not", but why would you go to all that trouble (and make multiple posts about it) to explain how you could possibly have info if you don't actually have any info?!?
To bluff us out to make us think he has info when he really doesn't, due to the mafia not doing shit during the night phase? (although, I suppose they might have done something, and we just don't know that yet). I don't see the point in that, it only serves to confuse, but that might be his purpose.ZeekLTK wrote:
Again, like the "hunch" statement, at the end he throws in something saying "or I might not", but why would you go to all that trouble (and make multiple posts about it) to explain how you could possibly have info if you don't actually have any info?!?
- edion0
- edion0
-
edion0
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 171
- Joined: February 2, 2006
- Location: sitting on my ass in my room
imo, i'd vote for him even if he was cop seeing as how bad he's doing seems to be a major liuability for the town.ZeekLTK wrote:Look at some of his posts:Medicated Lain wrote:Zeek I'm just curious what you meant by that?ZeekLTK wrote:Considering everything that's happened, I'm content with my vote on Peers.
It seems like he does have more information than he should at this point, which most likely means he's mafia.
We had a night phase - but nothing happened (for me at least), so what is there to go by other than the random voting stage that games normally start with?Peers wrote:Guys, we had a night phase. There's no reason to be random voting.
What is this comment even suppose to mean? It seems like something happened for Peers, or that he at least has some kind of information that he feels he doesn't need to randomly vote with (although I still fail to see how a vote for someone because they have the same name is anything but random).
This one Peers basically admits that he knows something we don't. And then he tries to backtrack saying he has a "hunch" (this is not consistent with ANYTHING he's said previously or afterwards though).Peers wrote:Yes, because the obvious way of looking at it is that I'm mafia. I should be lynched right away. Unless, of course, I'm not mafia. I could have an investigation power. Or, y'know, I could just have a hunch. Hunches are allowed, right? And they're not random.ryan wrote:And that's a good reason to vote somebody? That's the same thing as random voting Peers. There's no reason to say that junk is anymore town than I am, unless of course you know who's town and who's not because you are indeed mafia.
So either he's the WORST COP EVER (for revealing himself on DAY 1 - especially *without* revealing any investigations!) or he's mafia. Odds are higher that he's mafia.
This one, in the paragraph that starts with "So", he again basically admits that he has information ("there's other ways for me to have info"). He says (this is my summary) "yeah I have info but just because I do that doesn't automatically make me mafia, I could be a cop".Peers wrote:Wow... and I thought I tended to overreact.ryan wrote:Also for you to vote me AND bring up that you could have an investigative power is completely uncalled for. If you were a cop, you just basically outed yourself and if you aren't the cop, you're basically saying you investigated me and found scum (which you didn't since I'm not) Why are you trying to sway the game to follow you so early Peers?
So, when someone says "The only way you could have info on who is and isn't scum is if you're mafia", it's completely uncalled for for me to point out that you're wrong, there's other ways for me to have info... or I might not have info at all? Wow. How do I defend myself against a charge that I didn't need to defend myself?
And, tell me, ryan... where did I try to sway the game to follow me? I made a vote and gave a reason for it. You attacked me. I defended myself. No 'swaying' involved. I didn't even try to get other people to vote for you. I notice you didn't attack the other person voting for you. Just me. Why is that? You're not scumbuddies trying to lure someone into a trap, are you?
MOD: Fixed tags.
Again this is HORRIBLE if he really is the cop. So chances are he's NOT the cop. Again, if he's not the cop, and he has info, well, most likely he's mafia.
Again, like the "hunch" statement, at the end he throws in something saying "or I might not", but why would you go to all that trouble (and make multiple posts about it) to explain how you could possibly have info if you don't actually have any info?!?
(i know i haven't been very active, but i haven't really had much to say- was in another game fairly recently that was pretty much jsut argument all D1 rather than real discussion and it's hard to make much info from it)
so a robot, a cyborg, and a midget walk into a bar...
********************************
[url]http://www.geocities.com/the.commons[/url]
********************************
[url]http://www.geocities.com/the.commons[/url]
- Medicated Lain
- Medicated Lain
-
Medicated Lain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 714
- Joined: December 2, 2002
- Location: Japan
- Contact:
Well, edion used a k, but with the quote above by Peers I think my vote is going to stick.
ML: Peers and ryan had a big argument in the first part of this game, so this generally does 2 things:
1. Means nothing much of anything, as it is only two people arguing a null point.
2. Detracts from other conversation starters.
Therefore, I don't find Peers so much scummy as pitbullish. He latches on and doesn't let go for a while.
ML: Peers and ryan had a big argument in the first part of this game, so this generally does 2 things:
1. Means nothing much of anything, as it is only two people arguing a null point.
2. Detracts from other conversation starters.
Therefore, I don't find Peers so much scummy as pitbullish. He latches on and doesn't let go for a while.
- kabenon007
- kabenon007
-
kabenon007
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1186
- Joined: April 19, 2007
- Location: Cannot be disclosed, as it would jeapordize my mission
- kabenon007
- kabenon007
-
kabenon007
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1186
- Joined: April 19, 2007
- Location: Cannot be disclosed, as it would jeapordize my mission
I think it was kind of a dumb thing to say for edion, but I can't really see how it would make sense as something to say. I mean scum definitely want to kill cops, but you'd think they'd try to be quiet about it. Then again, I'm getting a bit WIFOM here so...
I think we have someone saying something dumb, and someone else jumping on it to distract attention from themselves.
I think we have someone saying something dumb, and someone else jumping on it to distract attention from themselves.
Unvote, Vote: Peers
- edion0
- edion0
-
edion0
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 171
- Joined: February 2, 2006
- Location: sitting on my ass in my room
like i said, it's my opinion that
going to go do a read through of the posts to see if there's anything in particular to note besides the argument over the ryan's...
if
he's a cop, then he's doing such a poor job at it that he's become a liability to the town. would i like to kill the cop in general? not no, but hell no. that said, i know i'm just digging myself deeper w/ some of you, but i stand by my opinions and will not explain myself any further on the matter.going to go do a read through of the posts to see if there's anything in particular to note besides the argument over the ryan's...
so a robot, a cyborg, and a midget walk into a bar...
********************************
[url]http://www.geocities.com/the.commons[/url]
********************************
[url]http://www.geocities.com/the.commons[/url]