Mafiascum.net

In post 99, Sesq wrote:

In post 97, Tatl and Tael wrote:If I'm coming across as too LAMIST compared to my usual play, that's because I'm approaching this game differently than others due to multiball.
My prototype for how we played this game is how Titus wanted to approach the Radiant Moonlight Fire&Ice and I'm trying to enact her vision of correct multiball play.
If you have some other reason to scumread us I would appreciate if you'd explain it.

not really aside from feeling

which is totally legitimate yes i am aware

in reality, i don't know what to think or believe right now, so i have to park my vote somewhere, yu're it

sorry

I don't know what to think about the fact that you're apologising for voting us. Your voting post seemed pretty sure, backtracking from it feels off. Also hi again!

Hawk wrote:

In post 96, Sesq wrote:hi

skitter is right about everything

except this

VOTE: titi and tael

This is a Wifom pop-in if I've ever seen one....

Sesq why are you voting T&T??

Also

Mod: I'm VLA till Monday taking a weekend with the family so won't be able to check in much

I'm guessing you mean wolfy rather than wifom. Why do you think that?


-Tatl

In post 90, Tatl and Tael wrote:

In post 89, RadiantTroubadour wrote:I have I don't know whether he's serious but he's tone feels so pure newbtown that my interpretation is that he's not sure if he's serious and genuinely trying to clear that up.
I mean I have a read on you GIF I just don't think it would be helpful if I outed it

Uh this was said by Tatl, yup that's what's happened here.

hey I've played multiple hydra games and haven't altslipped yet! What is this defamation?

you're taking my posts too seriously on multiple levels

it's just kind of embarrassing really

it's a shrugging sorry and the things i actually said confirm my vote was not serious

clarification of previous post

I think you be blowing things out of proportion.

That said, I wouldn't say Sesq is off the hook. IGMEOU.

Oh by the way, I'm barely active on weekends.
I'll still be here though.

Anyway I was gonna do something with that lolhawkvote, but I got too busy and messed up the pace so I'm just gonna drop it.
His following replies looked kinda town to me anyway.


UNVOTE:

VOTE: Iconeum

Like...43 could have been funny and RVSy. But your 51, 54, and 58 are just...unnecessary and fake. Especially 58.

Talk to you Monday, I guess. Wouldn't be surprised to see you pop in soon.

what is "igmeou" fror the life of me

In post 107, Sesq wrote:what is "igmeou" fror the life of me

i got my eye on you

really frightened, thanks

In post 106, Mumble wrote:VOTE: Iconeum

Like...43 could have been funny and RVSy. But your 51, 54, and 58 are just...unnecessary and fake. Especially 58.

Talk to you Monday, I guess. Wouldn't be surprised to see you pop in soon.

Yeah those posts looks weird

In post 106, Mumble wrote:VOTE: Iconeum

Like...43 could have been funny and RVSy. But your 51, 54, and 58 are just...unnecessary and fake. Especially 58.

Talk to you Monday, I guess. Wouldn't be surprised to see you pop in soon.

I disagree. NM's posts have been useless. By interacting with him i tried getting some actual discussion out of him. Do you disagree with my 58?

What the hell does that comment on my popping in mean?

In post 65, RedFlavor wrote:Also, NM's iso looks very bad, I dont see any town motivitaon in his posts. When he got L-3, he voted with GIF nakedly which looks weird. I would vote NM but it would be L-1 so Ill vote

VOTE: GuyInFreezer

Attacks NM, votes guyinfreezer without any explanation?

I voted GIF because they voted same person and thought NM was at L-1

I'm not voting for Not Mafia this day phase. I have had a lot of dealings with Not Mafia and he plays the same almost, in either alignment. It gets to a point that he virtually becomes a policy lynch for myself because he's hard to read. So I'm not prepared to jump on that wagon just yet.

But this vote stands out for me.

VOTE: RedFlavour

Not Mafia may be chatting shit with his ramblings and his claims, and yes whilst I jump on those type of comments, I just think he's dicking around.

Lynching him this day phase may appease those comments if he flips scum, but if he flips town, where does that leaves us on moving forward?

Need to baseline some reads before my weekend get nuts. Will be low activity for this weekend and also T/W/R of next week. Hoping Math can pop in a few times as well.

Kop’s entrance pings me. Although I always feel like scumreading Kop because he looks tryhard.

Agree with the Iconeum TRs.

No clue how to sort GIF, but 105 would be weird coming from scum.

I think math is TRing Beef, but I’m not feeling it. Hard to articulate why, so I’ll sideline this one for now.

Somewhat inclined to agree with Kop on N_M. Although I can see some effective scumplay in his posts.

Paranoid of Sky. His only meaningful interactions iirc have been with us and he hasn’t made a real effort anywhere else. Need more content.

Sesq looks scummy. Overly defensive and sheepy. I feel OK about sorting her though based on a previous game. A little pressure will probably sort her fairly quickly.
VOTE: Sesq

Math says he can read Red. Idk how. This is my third game with him and I have no idea how to sort him. Maybe I’m just bad lol. I don’t like his posts, but I’m not sold that they are scum-motivated.

cannot defend if there is no attack

buzzwords are not an essential mafia strategy, you know

and yes, i CAN defend, if i want, and i'm going to:

"how is that necessarily scum behavior"

argument dismantled

i was debating if i should because setting a precedent where things like this are given attention is not really the best thing necessarily? i'm kind of mixed, i guess. sick of the status quo of discourse.

In post 118, Technical Difficulties wrote:Although I always feel like scumreading Kop because he looks tryhard.

What part of

In post 116, Kop wrote:I'm not voting for Not Mafia this day phase. I have had a lot of dealings with Not Mafia and he plays the same almost, in either alignment. It gets to a point that he virtually becomes a policy lynch for myself because he's hard to read. So I'm not prepared to jump on that wagon just yet.

But this vote stands out for me.

VOTE: RedFlavour

and

In post 117, Kop wrote:Not Mafia may be chatting shit with his ramblings and his claims, and yes whilst I jump on those type of comments, I just think he's dicking around.

Lynching him this day phase may appease those comments if he flips scum, but if he flips town, where does that leaves us on moving forward?

looks tryhard to you?

I still think Not_Mafia joking with incorrect game mechanic is town, btw.
(If people wanted to know why I townread N_M, there ya go.)

Kop wrote:I'm not voting for Not Mafia this day phase. I have had a lot of dealings with Not Mafia and he plays the same almost, in either alignment. It gets to a point that he virtually becomes a policy lynch for myself because he's hard to read. So I'm not prepared to jump on that wagon just yet.

But this vote stands out for me.

VOTE: RedFlavour

Any reason for the vote? You talked about the leading wagon but not about the player you're voting.

In post 118, Technical Difficulties wrote:No clue how to sort GIF, but 105 would be weird coming from scum.

I went and looked at the post but I don't see how it would be weird coming from scum.


-Tatl

So I was going to give TD space but at this point there's something I dislike about every single one of their posts and the only person I feel strongly enough about to consider as an alternative is RedFlavor but even them there's stuff I like? Like there's not really any comparable options to me and that's the only situation I'd consider lynching someone I expect to be active, so, like idk, I don't want to not wagon scum right now. Let's get this wagon going seriously and we'll see if TD does anything to make me reevaluate that read.

-Tael

@Mumble I still expect a response to my question.

VOTE: Technical Difficulties

Sesq feels town, Skitter has been bumped up to near locktown, not happy with mumble, Kop is okay.