It doesn't make sense to me.In post 97, eth0s wrote: Oh that's because I don't think she was trying to look town, I think she was trying to look "so town" or in other words I think LAMIST was part of her plan. Hopefully that makes sense.
I was implying that Ruru said that, not you. Also, she did not imply VT was the worst thing to lynch. Nope.In post 97, eth0s wrote: I also don't think we should lynch a random lurker. wagon =/= lynch. So I don't think you should imply that I said that. Also I didn't misunderstand or misrep ruru. She said "so lynching a random non-VT player should be a good thing". That sentence just doesn't sit well with me. Obviously lynching scum is a good idea but why imply that VT is the worst thing to lynch? That just doesn't make any sense.
By no means do you have to post your reads, but I would have appreciated it. If you're town, help me sort you. To me, this is scummy.
@skitter30 I wasn't brushing off your vote. I'm just glad you're out of RVS. It took you longer than I expected it would have as town. As to why I don't want to reevaluate those two D1, I think that D1 reads are often easier to get early in the day, and more likely to be obfuscated by scum towards the end of the day.