Page 5 of 103

Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 12:05 pm
by Kokichi Oma
I meant why would he assume I was grapes

Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 12:05 pm
by Kokichi Oma
In post 98, zMuffinMan wrote:
In post 95, Kokichi Oma wrote:
In post 68, Human Sequencer wrote:firstly grapes =/= kochiki
What's this mean
it looks like he's saying grapes is equal to a slash which is equal to "kochiki", whatever that means

im helpful

(helpful people are town, btw)
This sounds like something youd say as scum

Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 12:19 pm
by zMuffinMan
because brian said something about grapes waiting 5 days

and nah, i wouldn't say that as scum. i'd only say that as town. honest

Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 12:27 pm
by grapes
Evening commoners

Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 12:36 pm
by Kaede Akamatsu
Pretty sure I've seen Wisdom make that kind of joke before, whether it's something that he does nowadays or not is another thing entirely.
Why do you think that kind of joke would only come from a scum mindset?

Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 12:37 pm
by Purrcocet
ill lynch in
-------
andriod
human sequencdr
muffinz
kokichi
kaede(????!?????!!?? maybe)

Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 12:38 pm
by Kaede Akamatsu
In post 105, Purrcocet wrote:ill lynch in
-------
andriod
human sequencdr
muffinz
kokichi
kaede(????!?????!!?? maybe)
Boring~

Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 12:45 pm
by Purrcocet
i am on my nyinth life x_x

Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 2:05 pm
by grapes
In post 34, zMuffinMan wrote:
In post 20, Brian Skies wrote:Please be town this time.
if you believe it to be true, nothing is impossible. don't let my actual alignment get in the way of things

btw, i'm a novice reflexive fruit vendor
Oh you actually rolled scum didn't you

Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 2:12 pm
by grapes
In post 50, Dunnstral wrote:Hey grapes, I have a proposal, once you decide to start the voting, can the first vote you place be on yourself, followed up by you switching to your real vote?
Uhm.

Why?

Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 2:15 pm
by zMuffinMan
i'm pleading the mafia equivalent of the fifth

also put a vote down already

Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 2:22 pm
by grapes
Sure thing but i wanna hear dunn's angle first

Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 3:08 pm
by Moment
Seems I'm late to the party.

Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 3:19 pm
by Moment
Not all that much to do before we can vote. I've got light townreads for one (likely poor) reason or another on Kokichi, HS, hebichan and Dunnstral.

If I could vote, it'd likely be on Kaede for this post:
In post 82, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:
In post 79, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 77, mastina wrote:BTW investigatives should stay off me; they'd be wasting their action.
I'm a D3 Innocent Child.
If you are wondering, no, not automatic; I have to manually trigger it.
Nice fakeclaim

Reveal
What makes you think it's a fake claim?
I have a hard time believing that anyone could actually have this sort of thought process and ask that question.

Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 3:36 pm
by Kaede Akamatsu
In post 113, Moment wrote:I have a hard time believing that anyone could actually have this sort of thought process and ask that question.
The underline is that, FakeGod has in fact used a role that has been present on several players but effective at different game days for each, hence seeing a D3 IC is not something outside what he would do, hence I asked that question. It is possible that Dunnstral either A) Doesn't know this, B) Is trying to throw shade at mastina or C) Does in fact have something to counter that statement. The question is to verify within which option does this fall.

Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 3:37 pm
by Purrcocet
grapes i am ur deputy btw

Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 3:58 pm
by Moment
In post 114, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:
In post 113, Moment wrote:I have a hard time believing that anyone could actually have this sort of thought process and ask that question.
The underline is that, FakeGod has in fact used a role that has been present on several players but effective at different game days for each, hence seeing a D3 IC is not something outside what he would do, hence I asked that question. It is possible that Dunnstral either A) Doesn't know this, B) Is trying to throw shade at mastina or C) Does in fact have something to counter that statement. The question is to verify within which option does this fall.
Ah, I understand. Your original question implied a much less nuanced view; at least, that's how I read it. I'm actually in agreement with you there in wondering what Dunnstral may have to strictly counterclaim mastina.

Thinking more, if Dunnstral truly
did
have something that would imply that mastina was scum fakeclaiming, I would have expected him to elaborate more, or at least say something else; after all, finding someone as confirmed scum seems to warrant more words than simply "nice fakeclaim". It's possible that Dunnstral thought that mastina was fakeclaiming and yet still town, but in that case one wonders what his motivation for counterclaiming would be in the first place.

It seems as though Dunnstral was revealing some sort of Innocent Child role anyways meaning these questions will be largely irrelevant in the context of determining Dunnstral's alignment, but if not they're worth considering.



With that misconception cleared up, I'm not actually certain where my vote would be right now, could I use it.

Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 4:01 pm
by Kaede Akamatsu
In post 116, Moment wrote:It seems as though Dunnstral was revealing some sort of Innocent Child role anyways meaning these questions will be largely irrelevant in the context of determining Dunnstral's alignment, but if not they're worth considering.
In which case then the possibility falls within A) or C).
Which will either help us get a clearer view on mastina's motives, or help Dunnstral's views on mastina's fake/claim

Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 4:02 pm
by zMuffinMan
orrrrrrrrrr crazy theory, dunnstral was joking

Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 4:04 pm
by Moment
In post 118, zMuffinMan wrote:orrrrrrrrrr crazy theory, dunnstral was joking
If he was, the humor was certainly lost on me. Is that how you interpreted it when you first saw it?

Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 4:05 pm
by Kaede Akamatsu
In post 118, zMuffinMan wrote:orrrrrrrrrr crazy theory, dunnstral was joking
I do admit that i didnt consider that possibility, the way the post was worded does seem to show animosity towards it, hence i overlooked that possibility.
P-Edit: I concur with Moment's question.

Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 4:06 pm
by zMuffinMan
In post 119, Moment wrote:If he was, the humor was certainly lost on me. Is that how you interpreted it when you first saw it?
either that or he's a D1 IC and that was him revealing it

wait til fakegod checks in, i suppose

Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 4:11 pm
by Moment
I'm not sure how meaningful it is, but on some unexplainable instinctual level I find it strange how, if that's your viewpoint, this was your reaction to my theorizing:
In post 118, zMuffinMan wrote:orrrrrrrrrr crazy theory, dunnstral was joking

Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 4:12 pm
by Human Sequencer
moment is putting a lot of extravagant effort into his wording rn
might be an easy sort through meta which I may or may not get around to doing later

Dunn post could have realistically been a joke

i appreciate the info on kaede, nosferatu
Wisdom,
can you back up what he said? Or do you disagree.

Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 4:16 pm
by Kaede Akamatsu
Oh asking the perp instead of the victim.
Nice.