Mafiascum.net

I thought about elbirn but maybe he is just picking a fight

dave post there feels kinda lame and safe

directed @@@TW

In post 97, the worst wrote:Hmm what an interesting rvs. Time to test out my new chainsaw.

VOTE: Elbirn

In post 98, Raskolnikov wrote:VRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR-

FRICK GUYS
ARE YOU TRYING TO WAKE THE BABY

In post 78, profii wrote:

In post 73, Raskolnikov wrote:VOTE: No Lynch

Well this is worse than giving us yourself as scum, Elbirn. Wanna wagon your scum buddy here?

I am actually inclined to give both Elbirn and Rask slight town points for their entrances. Slight.

Elbirn has since lost the town points, for pushing his entrance and running with it.

But I like that they both went against the crowd, because it stands out. It's a moment in the game where it's acceptable to go with the crowd and throw any old vote out there. They didn't have to stand out, but they went with the option anyway.

In post 100, Raskolnikov wrote:I thought about elbirn but maybe he is just picking a fight

dave post there feels kinda lame and safe

Elbirn's vote feels like its throw at like obvtown fmpov but that's a good take.

VOTE: dave

In post 104, Chickadee wrote:

In post 78, profii wrote:

In post 73, Raskolnikov wrote:VOTE: No Lynch

Well this is worse than giving us yourself as scum, Elbirn. Wanna wagon your scum buddy here?

I am actually inclined to give both Elbirn and Rask slight town points for their entrances. Slight.

Elbirn has since lost the town points, for pushing his entrance and running with it.

But I like that they both went against the crowd, because it stands out. It's a moment in the game where it's acceptable to go with the crowd and throw any old vote out there. They didn't have to stand out, but they went with the option anyway.

I totally agree with the last paragraph here. I’m going to add the point that this is RVS, we’re literally going to talk about anything against the grain right now due to lack of anything else to talk about. So the argument that self voting or No Lynching is poor play is bogus IMO. Town would discuss White House policies if it helped us to find scum. So all in all, the play isn’t bad. It’s just totally NAI at this point in time.

Also, before I go any further:
A) Gonna claim Flying Pumpkin That Shoots Lazer Beams Out Of Its Ass now so it’s out of the way.
B) I’m actually underage, so the only beer I’ll be drinking tonight is root beer.

I think inferno flails by now if they're scum

I don't feel like entertaining elbrin's schtick as scum. Will entertain an inferno tunnel as scum.

I'll read the worst trolling as the wagon grows on them as town for now

I will read better than a skim tomorrow provided the thread doesn't blow up.

In post 108, Flubbernugget wrote:I think inferno flails by now if they're scum

...so...
why aren't you voting him?

do you think inferno is flailing dram?

imo Elbirn is town and just acting dumb

Raskolnikov is scum though

VOTE: Raskolnikov

also if I'm right about Raskolnikov being scum, then inferno is town. I doubt scum buddies would immediately have an interaction like that

oshit xyzzy are you town this time?

In post 89, Gustavo wrote:

In post 86, profii wrote:

In post 83, Gustavo wrote:VOTE: profli

Well this doesn’t look like RVS. Porque por favor?

I don’t like your posts so far

Which ones and why

Agreed. In my onion I think the first reaction test (elbirn) is fine but the second one (rask) a bit LAMIST especially considering he never really followed up on it other than his read on inferno.
VOTE: rask

Tonereading profi's 86 and 114 as a bit defensive.

alright my current vote is boring anyway

VOTE: Rask

I like 87 for not jumping to conclusions I guess. We're supposed to get out of RVS but Inferno says this isn't a damning issue for now which is true. I don't think calling the entrance out is scummy, as it generates discussion and a seasoned player would know that the arguments formed in RVS are weak (so it's hard for scum to really push a mislynch). Correct?

In that case I think Elbirn would know that. If inferno or Profii is scum this could be Elbirn trying to grant him some credit but apart from that idk what the scum benefit of opening like this is.

In short yay we're out of RVS but I have no reason to believe either of those 3 is hard scum right now

What reaction test? The Dave vote?

Nah elbirn's self vote and rask's no lynch vote

lolscummy rvs slayers gambitty reaction tests yeah

No one understands my genius

Also what the fuck is LAMIST
How long have I been gone for that you people have entirely new acronyms

I'm gonna unpack some things tomorrow, I just wanted to post meaningless nothings here because I like attention

"Look at me I'm so town"

I was just as confused when I first saw it.

Slight TR on Rask, though his usage of reaction results is offbase.
My post acknowledged there were a couple reaction tests in play without actually reacting to them. That's NAI, especially from me, though Rask has too little exposure to me to know it.

The actual LAMIST posts here are from Profii. Town should think a no-lynch RVS vote is NAI or a reaction test. I give Profii scum points for going out of his way to paint NL as bad -- that position is so routine it goes without saying, so saying it tends to come from scum trying to look town.

@HWS re:119 -- no, the vote for no lynch is the reaction test.

TW sheeping Rask seemed a little sketchy but I know from recent completed games with TW that it's quite normal.

I kinda want to vote into the people voting Rask, but can't decide who I like the least there.