In post 9, Skygazer wrote:Code: Select all
A Wh4t 28/272 10.3%
B northsidegal 33/272 12.1%
C RadiantCowbells 35/272 12.9%
D Carcalilly 33/272 12.1%
E schadd_ 31/272 11.4%
F Performer 36/272 13.2%
G Skygazer 00/272 00.0%
H Dunnstral 38/272 14.0%
I Eragon 38/272 14.0%
how do people get different maths
In post 11, schadd_ wrote:oh also i noticed and realized that this setup is sucks lmaof
Its... different... thats for sure
I dont see how you can vibe them as the scumteam when they haven't even said anything about each other?
?????
If your going based off % wouldn't you look at the people with a better chance? I really dont see this logic here
In post 21, Performer wrote:RC why did you reject my nrg application for no good reason.
Dunn you didn't mention me (though I'm town, yess) in your c, d, e.
This is the background information I know so far:
-schad & I have hosted games where we’ve seen rc as scum and town, and I’m sure a good # of us have seen him scum or town. Schad has seen my scum game before
-played with carca 3 years ago when we were town
-dunnstral’s playstyle typically gives me a scum tone
-can’t recall if I played with nsg before
--------
It’s you, it’s you, these aren’t empty words
It’s you, it’s you, this isn’t a misunderstanding
It’s you, it’s you, I won’t say anything else, you can trust me
It’s you, it’s you, don’t hide
It’s you, it’s you, don’t avoid me
-Golden Child – It’s U
hmm I like this as starting off the game trying to put info out there and get the game rolling
In post 23, Dunnstral wrote: In post 21, Performer wrote:RC why did you reject my nrg application for no good reason.
Dunn you didn't mention me (though I'm town, yess) in your c, d, e.
This is the background information I know so far:
-schad & I have hosted games where we’ve seen rc as scum and town, and I’m sure a good # of us have seen him scum or town. Schad has seen my scum game before
-played with carca 3 years ago when we were town
-dunnstral’s playstyle typically gives me a scum tone
-can’t recall if I played with nsg before
--------
It’s you, it’s you, these aren’t empty words
It’s you, it’s you, this isn’t a misunderstanding
It’s you, it’s you, I won’t say anything else, you can trust me
It’s you, it’s you, don’t hide
It’s you, it’s you, don’t avoid me
-Golden Child – It’s U
All in all this post is pretty scummy though
"You didn't mention me"
Plus an info dumb nobody asked for in the middle
uhh, its the logical thing.
"you didnt mention me"
when "I'm"(performer) has one of the best chances of flipping scum, so ignoring that is weird.
And so what if its an info dump no one asked for?
did anyone ask
you
to post?
if yes, then your scum because no one said in this thread
If no, then your being hypocritical.
your choice
I could see these.
not sure on the gazer at this time
why do you think performer is scum?
uhh defense OMGUS??
idk what to make of this b/c I think Scum buddies would be more careful about their defense, but the timing would be odd for town!schadd voting.
In post 31, schadd_ wrote:hi radiantcowbells let me know when you're around i wanna do a reaction test ok? thanks x
its not a reaction test if you say your reaction testing o.0
dunn's post
"im town, look at __, __, __"
"performer scum"
/vote performer
"Schad scummy"
???
In post 37, Performer wrote:
Hold on, you mentioned 3 people and I had the 2nd highest % to be scum . None of those 3 were me or the bottom 2 iirc.
Plus we've played 22 games together where I've never seen you come out of the gate voting someone like this.
Only reason I haven't put you on L-1 is that I'm not sure if we have any quick hammer types in here, I've never played a game without any prs like this , and so...that dual combination scares me on pg 2. If we had prs, I'd feel much safer with a safety net but damn. I've also seen your town game in case you are actually town so putting you at L-1 in case someone quick hammers, is too risky so early.
I want to see what more people say.
say about what?
I agree with you the letter stuff is odd,
and I agree you shouldn't put anyone to L-1 until we have decided on a Lynch.
(except hammer testing :3)
In post 40, Carcalilly wrote:
true
RadiantCowbells wrote:Am I the only one who thinks dunnformer r buddies
yes
schadd_ wrote:you smell lol
only scum would say that
why dont you think Dunn is scum?
is the "only scum would say that:" a joke?
In post 43, Skygazer wrote:just a quick note that i fully intend to quickhammer dunn if he hits L1
wolfy.
why the hell would you want to quick hammer this early?
claiming that you will just gives you the space to not get lynched tommorow if you do and Dunn flips town.
In post 46, Carcalilly wrote:there is no benefit of quicklynching
none
so hold down your horses and schad please stop being scummy so I can Unvote you
rc why don't you agree with me
I agree with you.
but why are you wanting to unvote someone ou think is scummy?
In post 48, Carcalilly wrote:Im going to put out some gross theory that scum can and will try to hide behind the odds
Dunn since you're kinda on the spot rn please tell us everything you know and think and believe
agreed. I think town will
try
and focus on reads and actually doing stuff instead of just lynching based on numbers.
Because fuck RNG
In post 50, Carcalilly wrote: In post 37, Performer wrote:
Hold on, you mentioned 3 people and I had the 2nd highest % to be scum . None of those 3 were me or the bottom 2 iirc.
Plus we've played 22 games together where I've never seen you come out of the gate voting someone like this.
Only reason I haven't put you on L-1 is that I'm not sure if we have any quick hammer types in here, I've never played a game without any prs like this , and so...that dual combination scares me on pg 2. If we had prs, I'd feel much safer with a safety net but damn. I've also seen your town game in case you are actually town so putting you at L-1 in case someone quick hammers, is too risky so early.
I want to see what more people say.
This is why I like you performer
How do you feel about the high odds against you?
the question feels odd, why do you ask performer and not someone who has even MORE odds against them?
In post 51, Performer wrote:
You always sr me....
In post 46, Carcalilly wrote:there is no benefit of quicklynching
none
so hold down your horses and schad please stop being scummy so I can Unvote you
rc why don't you agree with me
yeah carca is likely town. Good to see we're town again!
I think this TR came too easily, but I dont think its
wrong
so-to-speak
In post 54, northsidegal wrote:
that quote is what makes you say that? it's not exactly a controversial opinion or a deep analysis. in fact, carca is probably my only scumlean so far.
VOTE: carca
I have 2 thoughts on this
1. I think this is towny because they hop right in with a scumread and trying to actually do things to solve the game without numbers
2. I dont like the read/vote itself, because I haven't really seen too much, and also, what do you expect, to have the game solved by start of page 3?? This seems really eager.
In post 58, Performer wrote:She's playing as if she has no agenda and I am also basing the read on meta (yes I know, it's old old meta). I'm sorry to confuse you guys but he let me use this avatar, I really like it because I like Kpop dance . I'm not vonflare, that's correct.
I thought so too
In post 60, Carcalilly wrote: In post 54, northsidegal wrote:
that quote is what makes you say that? it's not exactly a controversial opinion or a deep analysis. in fact, carca is probably my only scumlean so far.
VOTE: carca
I don't believe we've met but I like you already.
What's your opinion? Do you think a quicklynching of the greater odds scammers is a good idea or no?
this seems like hes trying to ameliorate(sorry, couldn't resist using a vocab word) the scumread on him, so its kinda odd IMO.
In post 62, northsidegal wrote:i don't think quicklynching is a good idea but i don't think it's towny to say that
but didnt you just say that?
asking for reads on page 3.
on everyone
(insert pocket gif here)
In post 72, Carcalilly wrote:rc I haven't played with you in a shit of a long time but can you not have your natural homeostasis state as scummy tysm ily no hetero
Pedit schadd is way scummiest than Dunn
I have no idea what you just said... but I like it!
In post 80, RadiantCowbells wrote:I would buy lillyformer as well
tldr stop being a scum
I don't think what you're trying to do is scummy. I just think your methods in a couple of posts were very ineffective.
ok
every time i've said i should sheep nsg i've talked myself out of it then regretted it
VOTE: Carcalilly
idont think sheeping is a good play this early. I definitely see town!NSG here, but I dont think that sheeping someones super early read is very, progressive...
In post 84, Performer wrote: In post 83, Carcalilly wrote:Like I see absolutely no reason to say what you said (and tbh it was unnecesarily aggressive), and just deciding that game ideology wasn't AI but not considering it further.
yay senpai voted me
Are you triggered by my buddying performer? Because that was quite a shift in opinion
This post is so bizarre.
Why the word choice of "buddying" and mentioning rc voted you. I get a bad feeling that you might be scum instead with a teammate. Of all the things carca that you could say, "interacted/talked to/etc" with me, why are you saying that? That just looks really disturbing.
-------------
off topic:
In post 81, northsidegal wrote:oh yeah i guess performer does have kind of a formal tone that tends to get scumread. not sure if it's actually scum-indicative or just how he talks always
wow....this is flattering but disturbing at the same time
you can ask carc, rc, dunn, shad, it's just how I sound. I have customer service experience and some of that shows onsite
"I would like to order 2 sides of fries and a new credit card"
"instead with a teammate"
>umm excuse me what?
"Why the word choice of buddying"
>I mean, I can see where it might sound weird, but I really dont like semantics
In post 85, northsidegal wrote:huh? no reason to say "i don't see the connection"? i don't think that that's what you're saying (i was just making conversation with performer...?), so i guess i'll assume you mean no reason to say "i don't think quicklynching is a good idea but i don't think it's towny to say that".
to that i would say that i saw someone who i scumread getting townread for a reason that seemed to me to not actually be a reason to townread someone, and so in response i said kind of plainly why i think their reason was not entirely valid. i suppose i could've been more verbose but i was posting from my phone when i said that. i didn't mean to come off as aggressive...?
if you saw someone you scumread getting townread for a reason you disagreed with, wouldn't you say something? i can't imagine how you would say that there's no reason to say what i said.
it also seems strange to me to frame what i did as deciding something and not considering it further. i mean, all i did was state my opinion on the matter, even prefaced with a "i don't think". in that regard, if you call that a decision without considering something further, couldn't you call all statements of opinion that someone makes "deciding something but not considering it further"?
second part: I agree with the reasoning behind what you said, but the way you said it was kinda hypocritical, because you said, "I agree, but I dont think its towny"
So, why bring up that its not towny if you agree with it?
third part: repeats second part
Last part: I think the tone behind this is pretty good and logical
In post 89, Carcalilly wrote:and no no no, the I don't see a connection was what I was talking about. You can't make a conversation about a totally off topic or shitpost anyway.
I mean it might just be your demeanor but as much as I appreciate sharing opinions, you kinda just like, even though you don't agree with what people seemed to be wanting, you just kinda mehd it and decided to jump on me (for initial reasons you haven't explained yet) and performer who was also just sharing his opinion.
uhh I do kinda think they explained it. they said they didnt like the fact that you said quicklynching is bad.
also, whats YOUR read on NSG? Based on them pushing you, do you think thats a scummy or a towny thing, and for the reasons they gave?
In post 90, Carcalilly wrote:Yes performer is awkward but there is no way scum would just say the stuff he's saying
"theres no way"
>how can you be so definitive that he CANT say that as scum?
legit how there different numbers AGAIN?
thats 3 people with 3 different sets of numbers...
wth lol
In post 97, Performer wrote:I'm not sure if carc's interactions with me are genuine town because of that 1 newbie game ages ago, or...faked from a mafia role...sigh...
this is absolutely going to haunt me.
"I love that rc voted me"
"oh because I am buddying performer?"
Wth
uhh, I really dont think that you should base meta off of something "ages ago"
why is that post scum indicative?
In post 100, northsidegal wrote:actually i'm not going to do it, it's really nothing substantial and would probably just weaken my position
i had slight reasons for voting you (carcalilly) initially but what i really think is more scum indicative is the way you've responded to what i've been asking. as i said, perhaps i'm falling victim to confirmation bias, but i feel as if your explanations for what you were previously saying lack a logical connection in a way that makes your previous thoughts more likely to have been fabricated.
"weaken my position"
>but dont you, as town, want to be thoughtful on the read? like, if your not reading because your worried it will change your read on him, thats not pro-town
In post 102, Skygazer wrote:nah but if there's a player that RC is willing to locktown then i wanna have a locktown
????????????????????????
why would you just blatant follow someone saying someone else is locktown
????????????????????????
RIP
In post 115, northsidegal wrote: In post 108, Carcalilly wrote:And by that quote I mean, you were more concerned about someone's townread than the chance voting shenanigans, and I thought that was a bit disordered in priorities.
actual reads seem far more important to me than the percentages. wouldn't you agree?
agreed, which is the main reason im still TR'ing you
In post 116, Skygazer wrote:RC not willing to give me townpoints for things makes sense from him bc he's told me a little bit in the past that he can't read me
im willing to locktown nsg unless RC flips scum at some point
also i think ive heard that nsg is more active as town? possibly?
i haven't played with that many people here but im hoping i can figure out eragon early and schadd later on but ive only seen schadd play on a roleplaying alt
your willing to lockdown NSg because RC says so?
then won't change until they flip scum?
what is this progression?
you dont think NSG is being active so far?
