Mini Normal 2050: Serial Killers - Game Over
Forum rules
- Mewtaph
-
Mewtaph Mafia Scum
- Mewtaph
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1903
- Joined: August 31, 2016
Well, now I see you're suggesting OMGUSing twice is scum-indicative, for when asked to elaborate, you referred back to the timing; when asked to elaborate onthat, you referred back to my votes following when another player has voted me (essentially just saying OMGUS is scummy). Is there a more player-specifc reason why you're scum reading me?- Xtoxm
-
Xtoxm EBWOXM
- Xtoxm
- EBWOXM
- EBWOXM
- Posts: 12886
- Joined: November 30, 2007
- LolWagons
-
LolWagons Mafia Scum
- LolWagons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1006
- Joined: June 5, 2012
In post 100, Mewtaph wrote:Well, now I see you're suggesting OMGUSing twice is scum-indicative, for when asked to elaborate, you referred back to the timing; when asked to elaborate onthat, you referred back to my votes following when another player has voted me (essentially just saying OMGUS is scummy). Is there a more player-specifc reason why you're scum reading me?
OMGUSing twice on people who have players on their bandwagons within four pages is scummy. Yes. Player specifics do not matter. It shows a focus on lynching those that suspect you and those that are also vulnerable to a lynch which is literally the cookie cutter way to play as mafia.
Normally I wouldn’t really count my wagon in the two because it was the transition from RVS but your push on it came across as contrived, in addition to being opportunistic and OMGUS. The subsequent backing down felt unnatural as well.- Dannflor
-
Dannflor he/himWhite Knight
- Dannflor
he/him- White Knight
- White Knight
- Posts: 11982
- Joined: May 25, 2012
- Pronoun: he/him
I think the order is incredibly important. You intention was to bring the wagon to L-2, but you afterwards realized it had been the vote to bring the wagon to L-1 instead. The distinction of whose vote actually put Mewtaph at L-1 is important imo, and from your perspective, it was yours accidentally.In post 79, podoboq wrote: When placing my vote, the intention was to bring the wagon to L-2. lolwagon's vote brings the wagon to L-1, regardless of the order in which our two votes were placed. I didn't want the wagon sitting on L-1.
By placing a vote at L-2, the intention is to get reactions from not only Mewtaph, but other players, without the immediate risk of lolhammers or Mewtaph claiming as a surprise town pr. If directly after my vote, the wagon is at L-1, whether it's because another person immediately followed me by voting or the previous L-2 was missed, my vote is no longer accomplishing its goal.
This is my first game on site for over three years, but aren't both these things still incredibly taboo? Especially considering we aren't in a newbie game? What town player is gonna quick hammer with the knowledge they'd be the next lynch target if Mewtaph flips town?In post 84, podoboq wrote:
Oh, by the way, yes. I've seen lolhammers happen before, and I doubt that you haven't. Lolclaims are also a problem, where an inexperienced, frustrated, or simply bad player sees themselves at L-1 and just claims because lol. I don't think either is a positive result with this little progress into the game.In post 72, Dannflor wrote:Podoboq, do you seriously believe someone is going to quick hammer 3 pages in and with 10 days left on the clock?
Based on your read of Mewtaph, if he is town, do you think an lolclaim would be a serious problem in putting him at L-1? I know you said his play was sloppy at best, but he seems to think about the game logically enough that I don't see something that stupid happening.
But whyIn post 101, Xtoxm wrote:Podoboq unvoting is a town instinct. I like itIn post 102, LolWagons wrote:OMGUSing twice on people who have players on their bandwagons within four pages is scummy. Yes. Player specifics do not matter. It shows a focus on lynching those that suspect you and those that are also vulnerable to a lynch which is literally the cookie cutter way to play as mafia.Oh this is BAD. As I said before, I read the previous lolwagons vs. Mewtaph exchange as town, even the subsequent unvote is fine IMO. Felt like town willing to admit they might've been wrong. But uh.... This vote sheeping me
againis pretty bad.
Mewtaph, you essentially naked vote podoboq here in post #80 and then every post after is basically questioning and criticizing the reasoning behind the votes on you. What the hell is your reasoning for your vote on podoboq? You're doing what I accused Doughboy of earlier in that you have an incredible self-focus where you care more about others' opinions on you than your own opinions on other people.
I assume you think podoboq is scummy, why? If it's just sheeping my vote and argument (again), why did you not respond to podoboq's own rebuttal to my argument that occurred directly before your vote? You thought no additional comment or addition necessary? You're constantly asking people to explain their reasoning and then discrediting that reasoning, yet remain shockingly opaque with your own reasoning.
Why did you vote for podoboq? because blindly following my lead or OMGUS are the two most self evident reasons, and they don't paint a pretty picture- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
Yeah, both things are incredibly taboo. I haven't played on here in a year and a half, and I remember lolhammers still happened. lolclaims are more common, and I don't think highly enough of Mewtaph to assume that they wouldn't do it.In post 103, Dannflor wrote:
This is my first game on site for over three years, but aren't both these things still incredibly taboo? Especially considering we aren't in a newbie game? What town player is gonna quick hammer with the knowledge they'd be the next lynch target if Mewtaph flips town?In post 84, podoboq wrote:
Oh, by the way, yes. I've seen lolhammers happen before, and I doubt that you haven't. Lolclaims are also a problem, where an inexperienced, frustrated, or simply bad player sees themselves at L-1 and just claims because lol. I don't think either is a positive result with this little progress into the game.In post 72, Dannflor wrote:Podoboq, do you seriously believe someone is going to quick hammer 3 pages in and with 10 days left on the clock?
Based on your read of Mewtaph, if he is town, do you think an lolclaim would be a serious problem in putting him at L-1? I know you said his play was sloppy at best, but he seems to think about the game logically enough that I don't see something that stupid happening.eagerSnake - "Fwiw mod steals pagetops while driving. Still think they wouldn't put in 2 people with ascetic?"- Gamma Emerald
-
Gamma Emerald Bigender (He/She)Survivor
- Gamma Emerald
Bigender (He/She)- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 63692
- Joined: August 9, 2016
- Pronoun: Bigender (He/She)
So like a SHROOPIn post 86, podoboq wrote:
"How town should go about achieving their win condition" is how I would expect the average person to think to phrase that sentence. It rolls off the tongue better, and just feels more natural. However, someone could pick you apart and say "He asked how town should achieve their win condition, leaving himself out, implying he isn't town." It's unlikely anybody would argue that, and they'd be wrong to argue it, but people could stupidly read it as a scum slip.In post 83, Mewtaph wrote:
I fail to see the difference? They say exactly the same thing.In post 81, podoboq wrote:You also ask "how someone should go about achieving their town win condition," instead of "how town should go about achieving their win condition," which just rubs me really wrong. If English isn't your first language, I apologize, and I'll admit that my read on you is probably miscolored. But if English is your first language, I don't see how these words, in this order, come off your keyboard. It feels extremely manicured, like somebody thinking how to present themselves as towny as possible.
"How someone should go about achieving their town win condition" has this funny implication that the question asker is town. It just looks very unnatural that your question is uncomfortably framed in the way that implies that you're town.
I can see itWe're falling through space, you and me, clinging to the skin of this tiny little world, and if we let go...That's who I am.
Visit mynewGTKAS page here!- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
I just had to look that up, but yeah, that's basically exactly what I was trying to get at.In post 105, Gamma Emerald wrote:
So like a SHROOPIn post 86, podoboq wrote:
"How town should go about achieving their win condition" is how I would expect the average person to think to phrase that sentence. It rolls off the tongue better, and just feels more natural. However, someone could pick you apart and say "He asked how town should achieve their win condition, leaving himself out, implying he isn't town." It's unlikely anybody would argue that, and they'd be wrong to argue it, but people could stupidly read it as a scum slip.In post 83, Mewtaph wrote:
I fail to see the difference? They say exactly the same thing.In post 81, podoboq wrote:You also ask "how someone should go about achieving their town win condition," instead of "how town should go about achieving their win condition," which just rubs me really wrong. If English isn't your first language, I apologize, and I'll admit that my read on you is probably miscolored. But if English is your first language, I don't see how these words, in this order, come off your keyboard. It feels extremely manicured, like somebody thinking how to present themselves as towny as possible.
"How someone should go about achieving their town win condition" has this funny implication that the question asker is town. It just looks very unnatural that your question is uncomfortably framed in the way that implies that you're town.
I can see iteagerSnake - "Fwiw mod steals pagetops while driving. Still think they wouldn't put in 2 people with ascetic?"- Gamma Emerald
-
Gamma Emerald Bigender (He/She)Survivor
- Gamma Emerald
- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
In post 107, Gamma Emerald wrote:Okay so who posted that, again?In post 15, Mewtaph wrote:Why engage in OMGUS this early?What are your thoughts on how someone should go about achieving their town win condition?eagerSnake - "Fwiw mod steals pagetops while driving. Still think they wouldn't put in 2 people with ascetic?"- Gamma Emerald
-
Gamma Emerald Bigender (He/She)Survivor
- Gamma Emerald
Bigender (He/She)- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 63692
- Joined: August 9, 2016
- Pronoun: Bigender (He/She)
Yeah that’s pretty icky
VOTE: Mewtaph
L-1 FYIWe're falling through space, you and me, clinging to the skin of this tiny little world, and if we let go...That's who I am.
Visit mynewGTKAS page here!- Dannflor
-
Dannflor he/himWhite Knight
- Dannflor
he/him- White Knight
- White Knight
- Posts: 11982
- Joined: May 25, 2012
- Pronoun: he/him
well that's DUMBIn post 104, podoboq wrote:I remember lolhammers still happened. lolclaims are more common
Mewtaph, can you also answer why lolwagons thinking OMGUSing is scummy is not satisfactory to you? What was the point of your whole intro to the game if you don't think OMGUS is scummy or at the very least useless?In post 100, Mewtaph wrote:Well, now I see you're suggesting OMGUSing twice is scum-indicative, for when asked to elaborate, you referred back to the timing; when asked to elaborate onthat, you referred back to my votes following when another player has voted me (essentially just saying OMGUS is scummy). Is there a more player-specifc reason why you're scum reading me?- Gamma Emerald
-
Gamma Emerald Bigender (He/She)Survivor
- Gamma Emerald
Bigender (He/She)- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 63692
- Joined: August 9, 2016
- Pronoun: Bigender (He/She)
Also I doubt anyone at this table lolhammersWe're falling through space, you and me, clinging to the skin of this tiny little world, and if we let go...That's who I am.
Visit mynewGTKAS page here!- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
But I will say, I love your flavor.In post 55, Thespio wrote:- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
It isn't though. Lots of games would be a greater estimated victory for the town with a day 1 mass claim; however, because of the games where it is not, and because it decreases overall skill and increases overall luck of a given game, it is typically viewed as an unfavorable strategy.In post 58, podoboq wrote:This is just explicitly wrong. The logical conclusion of this statement is that town should all claim immediately, because the more information town has the better. Concealing information from scum is also a factor, and Mewtaph's intro into this game is extremely sloppy if it's town play.
The "extremely sloppy" part doesn't track with me. What?- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
One could also argue strategic talk is the easiest for scum to post because it doesn't take critical thinking as one can just say their true thoughts. I don't believe this is a valid reason to townread somebodyIn post 64, podoboq wrote:
Decent scum could have just stayed quiet and let them continue to spin out.In post 61, mbaki wrote:Townreading a strategic discussion comment that is completely separate of the game, Podo?
Yes, I could. No, I don't feel like it. I don't believe its relevant.In post 68, Mewtaph wrote:
Can you explain why:In post 54, mbaki wrote:If the game was stagnant I would attempt to create content, but the game is active enough for a 9 player lobby on this site. I am just not interested in any of the content so far, nor does any of it really help me generate reads. No point shutting down activity that's helping you guys, even if I can't engage in it.
a) you aren't interested in the content
b) why it doesn't help you generate reads
c) why you can't engage with it
I don't think the fact he revoted when I moved my vote is overly indicative, but otherwise, I agree with this post.In post 72, Dannflor wrote:This whole issue is exacerbated by the fact of him jumping right back on the wagon when mbaki unvotes. Clearly he wants to push the wagon, he just doesn't want to be the one who puts him at L-1 because that draws too much attention.
I agree with this and bristep's prior post as well.In post 75, bristep123 wrote:Not the point, his vote was to put mewtaph to L2, once Lolwagons put them to L1 then podoboq was clear that they didn't want it at L1. For me, there's a difference.
I didn't find Podoboq's post before this awful, but this quoted one is not good.In post 84, podoboq wrote:
Oh, by the way, yes. I've seen lolhammers happen before, and I doubt that you haven't. Lolclaims are also a problem, where an inexperienced, frustrated, or simply bad player sees themselves at L-1 and just claims because lol. I don't think either is a positive result with this little progress into the game.In post 72, Dannflor wrote:Podoboq, do you seriously believe someone is going to quick hammer 3 pages in and with 10 days left on the clock?- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
VOTE: Dannflor
I have no solid reads yet in either direction. If anybody wants to inquire as to why I'm voting Dannflor despite my only comments towards his slot being partially agreeing with his case, come to that conclusion yourself.
Dannflor, how competent of a scum player do you reckon you are? Can you link your most recent 2 scum games please?- Xtoxm
-
Xtoxm EBWOXM
- Xtoxm
- EBWOXM
- EBWOXM
- Posts: 12886
- Joined: November 30, 2007
I don't have much either. I'm giving minor (and I mean minor) town pts to pod and lolwagonSmooth as silk when he's scum, and very much capable of running things from behind the scenes while appearing to be doing minimal effort. - Almost50
Xtoxm is consistently great - Shosin
you were the only wolf i townread at endgame - the worst- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
- Xtoxm
-
Xtoxm EBWOXM
- Xtoxm
- EBWOXM
- EBWOXM
- Posts: 12886
- Joined: November 30, 2007
- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Dannflor
-
Dannflor he/himWhite Knight
- Dannflor
he/him- White Knight
- White Knight
- Posts: 11982
- Joined: May 25, 2012
- Pronoun: he/him
I reckon I'm pretty shit as scum.In post 116, mbaki wrote:Dannflor, how competent of a scum player do you reckon you are? Can you link your most recent 2 scum games please?
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=54&t=24421
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=24395
Not very recent unfortunately but these are my last scum games- Xtoxm
-
Xtoxm EBWOXM
- Xtoxm
- EBWOXM
- EBWOXM
- Posts: 12886
- Joined: November 30, 2007
Nope. Town XDIn post 120, mbaki wrote:Scum, I would guess.Smooth as silk when he's scum, and very much capable of running things from behind the scenes while appearing to be doing minimal effort. - Almost50
Xtoxm is consistently great - Shosin
you were the only wolf i townread at endgame - the worst- Thespio
-
Thespio Mafia Scum
- Thespio
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1669
- Joined: June 3, 2015
DescriptionYang Xinhai, also known as Yang Zhiya, and Yang Liu, was a Chinese serial killer who confessed to committing 67 murders and 23 rapes between 1999 and 2003, and was sentenced to death and executed for 67. He was dubbed the "Monster Killer" by the media.
I will be handing out awards at the end of the game, so play your best, none are really cool and all of them are corny so try to win! Have fun!Mod Note:Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- Thespio
- Xtoxm
- Dannflor
- Xtoxm
- mbaki
- Xtoxm
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- Gamma Emerald
- Dannflor
- Gamma Emerald
- podoboq
- podoboq
- Gamma Emerald
- podoboq
- Dannflor
- LolWagons
- Xtoxm
- Mewtaph