Page 5 of 41

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 8:02 am
by themilkcartonkid
In post 99, Lovebird wrote:Slaxx towny. Maybe egix and tttt too. I'm OK with my vote rn, but milk is good wagon that I might switch to.
Why is slaxx towny? Explain your read

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 12:18 pm
by TTTT
VOTE: Milk
L-1

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 12:38 pm
by Slaxx
In post 75, themilkcartonkid wrote:
In post 72, Persivul wrote:
In post 66, Slaxx wrote:VOTE: Egix

5/5 on my read of you.
OK this is serious now, what's the reason?
This question needs to be answered and applies to rb as well
This is the post the pinged me. Pers and Milk were both trying to shift blame onto RB and I for the wagon while ignoring the people who just clapped on later. The difference between them is he also reiterated Pers’s question just a couple posts after Pers, which does little functionally for town except to put him on record that he too wanted the answer for the wagon, you know, to look better upon a town flip. Nothing about that post seemed genuine or has town utility but it has great scum posturing utility.

The vote on milk wasn’t about exclusively not pressuring the sheep, it was about trying to redistribute blame for the wagon in a shady way, that to me, looked a lot like someone posturing for a mislynch, thus the Egix unvote.

This was more scummy than the sheep votes, and thus I voted there. Could I have pressured the sheep on reasoning? Yeah. Because I didn’t do it and went after something more significant that caught my eye does that make me scum? Nope.

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 12:42 pm
by volxen
Votecount 1.03

Egix96 (0):

BuJaber (0):

vivit (0):

TTTT (0):

themilkcartonkid (L-1) (4): Slaxx (), rb (), BuJaber (), TTTT ()

Lovebird (0):

Slaxx (2): themilkcartonkid (), Persivul ()

Persivul (2): Lovebird (), Egix96 ()

rb (0):


No Lynch (0):

Not Voting (1):
vivit

With 9 players alive it takes 5 votes to lynch. If 5 players vote for a No Lynch, then the day will end early with no lynch.

Tree-stumps(0):



The deadline for Day 1 is in (expired on 2019-02-28 23:00:00).

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 12:43 pm
by Slaxx
Ftr I don’t like Buja’s vote on milk but it’s not enough to spook me off of the wagon like Milks reaction to the Egix wagon was.

There were four people, not five on the wagon, and also there could very well be one or even zero scum on the Egix wagon. Also, he said people not on the Egix wagon were town then voted someone who never hopped on. So. I’m cool with Buja/Milk now. Maybe not as a pair but both have high equity at this point. Buja could plausibly not be paying attention. If he wishes to explain his thought process more he can, as I can feasibly see a way where his vote makes sense but I’m not giving him the answer.

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 1:48 pm
by themilkcartonkid
In post 102, Slaxx wrote:
In post 75, themilkcartonkid wrote:
In post 72, Persivul wrote:
In post 66, Slaxx wrote:VOTE: Egix

5/5 on my read of you.
OK this is serious now, what's the reason?
This question needs to be answered and applies to rb as well
This is the post the pinged me. Pers and Milk were both trying to shift blame onto RB and I for the wagon while ignoring the people who just clapped on later. The difference between them is he also reiterated Pers’s question just a couple posts after Pers, which does little functionally for town except to put him on record that he too wanted the answer for the wagon, you know, to look better upon a town flip. Nothing about that post seemed genuine or has town utility but it has great scum posturing utility.

The vote on milk wasn’t about exclusively not pressuring the sheep, it was about trying to redistribute blame for the wagon in a shady way, that to me, looked a lot like someone posturing for a mislynch, thus the Egix unvote.

This was more scummy than the sheep votes, and thus I voted there. Could I have pressured the sheep on reasoning? Yeah. Because I didn’t do it and went after something more significant that caught my eye does that make me scum? Nope.
This is a made up reason. It 100%doesn't match up with the original post and if you cant see the town utility in backing up a good question (one of the few ones this game) then you aren't actually looking

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 1:51 pm
by Persivul
In post 102, Slaxx wrote:Pers and Milk were both trying to shift blame onto RB and I for the wagon while ignoring the people who just clapped on later.
Where do you get that I was trying to shift blame on you by asking you the reasoning for your read?

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 1:52 pm
by Slaxx
In post 105, themilkcartonkid wrote:
In post 102, Slaxx wrote:
In post 75, themilkcartonkid wrote:
In post 72, Persivul wrote:
In post 66, Slaxx wrote:VOTE: Egix

5/5 on my read of you.
OK this is serious now, what's the reason?
This question needs to be answered and applies to rb as well
This is the post the pinged me. Pers and Milk were both trying to shift blame onto RB and I for the wagon while ignoring the people who just clapped on later. The difference between them is he also reiterated Pers’s question just a couple posts after Pers, which does little functionally for town except to put him on record that he too wanted the answer for the wagon, you know, to look better upon a town flip. Nothing about that post seemed genuine or has town utility but it has great scum posturing utility.

The vote on milk wasn’t about exclusively not pressuring the sheep, it was about trying to redistribute blame for the wagon in a shady way, that to me, looked a lot like someone posturing for a mislynch, thus the Egix unvote.

This was more scummy than the sheep votes, and thus I voted there. Could I have pressured the sheep on reasoning? Yeah. Because I didn’t do it and went after something more significant that caught my eye does that make me scum? Nope.
This is a made up reason. It 100%doesn't match up with the original post and if you cant see the town utility in backing up a good question (one of the few ones this game) then you aren't actually looking
If it "100%" doesn't match then it should be pretty easy for you to point out the contradiction then, yes?

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 1:52 pm
by themilkcartonkid
Also, the use of blame is really weird here. Like, we dont know that egix is town so... what do you know that we dont?

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 1:53 pm
by Slaxx
In post 106, Persivul wrote:
In post 102, Slaxx wrote:Pers and Milk were both trying to shift blame onto RB and I for the wagon while ignoring the people who just clapped on later.
Where do you get that I was trying to shift blame on you by asking you the reasoning for your read?
"This is serious"

It was more of a tonal thing, but it read very much as "look what you've started, come explain yourself" than a more casual "hey whats the reason here"

Ftr I don't think its Milk/Pers.

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 1:54 pm
by Slaxx
In post 108, themilkcartonkid wrote:Also, the use of blame is really weird here. Like, we dont know that egix is town so... what do you know that we dont?
LOL

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 1:56 pm
by themilkcartonkid
The vote on milk wasn’t about exclusively not pressuring the sheep, it was about trying to redistribute blame for the wagon in a shady way, that to me, looked a lot like someone posturing for a mislynch, thus the Egix unvote.
You stated originally that the scummy thing is precisely that I was ignoring sheep, but here you say "well it was actually the WAY you did it" if you originally intended to communicate this then actually communicate it. Ymmine is the only reason you've given any reason and apparently the reason you gave isn't even your real reason

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 1:59 pm
by Slaxx
In post 78, Slaxx wrote:VOTE: Milk

Wanting to pressure the first two people on the wagon for blind votes on page 3 but ignore the Sheep. This is a good vote.
The vote on milk wasn’t about exclusively not pressuring the sheep, it was about trying to redistribute blame for the wagon in a shady way, that to me, looked a lot like someone posturing for a mislynch, thus the Egix unvote.
Those statements are not contradictions.

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 2:01 pm
by Persivul
In post 109, Slaxx wrote: "This is serious"

It was more of a tonal thing, but it read very much as "look what you've started, come explain yourself" than a more casual "hey whats the reason here"

Ftr I don't think its Milk/Pers.
L-1s are serious, dipshit.

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 2:01 pm
by themilkcartonkid
Pressure vs blame, they are not the same

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 2:01 pm
by Slaxx
In post 113, Persivul wrote:
In post 109, Slaxx wrote: "This is serious"

It was more of a tonal thing, but it read very much as "look what you've started, come explain yourself" than a more casual "hey whats the reason here"

Ftr I don't think its Milk/Pers.
L-1s are serious, dipshit.
Yeah they are you fucking prick

But I'm not the one who put them there

Ass

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 2:05 pm
by Slaxx
In post 114, themilkcartonkid wrote:Pressure vs blame, they are not the same

See but in your post above, you just said that it was the discrepancy between "milk did x" and now its "the WAY milk did X"

But here you say the difference is between pressure and blame

You see how easy it is to deflect with semantics? Because I used different phrasing does not mean what I am saying was significantly different. If that's what you want to try to push though, be my guest.

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 2:05 pm
by Persivul
In post 66, Slaxx wrote:VOTE: Egix

5/5 on my read of you.
Can you explain the read or not?

Instead of being concerned that you're being blamed for a wagon (no clue why you think of it in those terms), you could just explain the read.

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 2:07 pm
by Slaxx
In post 117, Persivul wrote:
In post 66, Slaxx wrote:VOTE: Egix

5/5 on my read of you.
Can you explain the read or not?

Instead of being concerned that you're being blamed for a wagon (no clue why you think of it in those terms), you could just explain the read.
Are you even fucking reading you illiterate shithead?

I said it was a reaction test

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 2:07 pm
by Slaxx
In post 77, Slaxx wrote:That was a reaction test on Egix and the fact a bunch of other people sheeped me and decided to start piling on while making sure to mention the lynch was mine probably means it flips town.

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 2:09 pm
by Persivul
Why do you think a wagon is worthy of blame?

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 2:11 pm
by Slaxx
In post 120, Persivul wrote:Why do you think a wagon is worthy of blame?
Because it flips town.

Based off of how fast that formed, and how milk (and maybe you) reacted, I am working under the assumption that it flips town.

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 2:13 pm
by Persivul
How about the L-1 wagon on milk which you're first on? That formed very fast, but you don't seem concerned about it.

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 2:17 pm
by Persivul
VOTE: Bujaber

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 2:18 pm
by Slaxx
It formed around the same speed but in the midst of more content, so I am not as concerned about it. Also, I like the reaction I got on this wagon, unlike Egix's.

Look at Egix ISO and the people who voted for him.

Now look at Milk's ISO up to L-1 and look at the people who voted for him.