Mafiascum.net

In post 97, RCEnigma wrote:Not Vedith, that's too easy. But is also exactly what Vedith would want you to think. Hmm.

In post 99, RCEnigma wrote:We are still best friends after all.

Yay us \o/

In post 96, RCEnigma wrote:

In post 73, Voted wrote:

In post 27, Voted wrote:Has voted for lynching VOTE: Saladman27.

Chances are you don't like me joining the wagoon against Saladman. I did it because I hope it could work as a catalyst and that it would increase the frequency of messages in this thread. Didn't work.

Reaching for the bottom rung here. The self awareness is ok. Hot take brought to you by nacho: voted flips scum then he's partnered with an SE.

Are you saying an SE coached him into giving that as a reason. Seems to me like an SE would come up with a better reason. If anything voted flipping scum would mean a non SE partner.

UNVOTE:

I'm going to click on that little activity overview thing
and vote for whoever is least engaged in this game

VOTE: Saladman

congrats!

In post 104, TTTT wrote:UNVOTE:

I'm going to click on that little activity overview thing
and vote for whoever is least engaged in this game

Where is this activity overview thing

Bottom right under the page count.

In post 103, thenavneet wrote:

In post 96, RCEnigma wrote:

In post 73, Voted wrote:

In post 27, Voted wrote:Has voted for lynching VOTE: Saladman27.

Chances are you don't like me joining the wagoon against Saladman. I did it because I hope it could work as a catalyst and that it would increase the frequency of messages in this thread. Didn't work.

Reaching for the bottom rung here. The self awareness is ok. Hot take brought to you by nacho: voted flips scum then he's partnered with an SE.

Are you saying an SE coached him into giving that as a reason. Seems to me like an SE would come up with a better reason. If anything voted flipping scum would mean a non SE partner.

Unless this is a tmi post right now, no. I was thinking more along the lines of how he reacted to pressure, the nonchalant attitude. As an SE the advice would be not to react to it and let town switch gears elsewhere. More or less.

It reads more like scum caught for bad reasoning and therefore not much to worry about.

Idk what to think about speculation over who Voted's hypothetical scumbuddy would be, other than that it all kinda evaporates if you allow for the possibility that Scum!Voted isn't Level 0 scum. Based on my one entire game of experience on this website, I'm more inclined to see getting antsy during RVS as a non-tell though.

Vote's staying on Clarity until I find a good home for it or she talks more.

Fair assessment, I'd like other slots to speak their opinion on voted.

I have a non-opinion on all of this.

Except that eir name no longer checks out.

VOTE: Voted

In post 109, Miss Kobayashi Maru wrote:Vote's staying on Clarity until I find a good home for it or she talks more.

Go heck yourself

Rough early reads would be something like:

{Kobe beef, CC}
{Vedith, datisi}
{Saladfinger}
{TTTT}
{Voted}

No context.

I find Clarity's lack of opinion a bit.. Weird? After not much posting coming to the discussion with nothing said.

But in any case, VOTE: Saladman27 for not posting one post that's game related. I'd like to hear more from him.

As for Voted, not finding their actions as definitely scummy, but not necessarily town either. (Would that be a non-tell?)

In post 113, RCEnigma wrote:{TTTT}
{Voted}

I actually like this part. \o/

In post 115, Datisi wrote:As for Voted, not finding their actions as definitely scummy, but not necessarily town either. (Would that be a non-tell?)

Interesting...

Vegetables are neat
Inspiring little lad anxious Saladman is sad
Cause his votecount is three
And that is very bad

VOTE: RCEnigma No true buddy/friend would call their friendship a deal.

In post 117, Vedith wrote:

In post 115, Datisi wrote:As for Voted, not finding their actions as definitely scummy, but not necessarily town either. (Would that be a non-tell?)

Interesting...

I'm just saying, I could see either a Scum or a Townie acting like that

I'm not disagreeing or agreeing. I just thought it was an Interesting take on it.
Also, that's called either a null read or NAI (Non alignment indicated)

Datisi if you think it's not alignment indicative
why'd you bother pointing it out at all?

In post 110, RCEnigma wrote:Fair assessment, I'd like other slots to speak their opinion on voted.

Because of this. I figured "slots" referred to other players. If that's not it and I misunderstood it, my bad.

It does Indeed refer to other players and I appreciate your input.

In post 122, Datisi wrote:

In post 110, RCEnigma wrote:Fair assessment, I'd like other slots to speak their opinion on voted.

Because of this. I figured "slots" referred to other players. If that's not it and I misunderstood it, my bad.

no you did good kid