Page 5 of 31
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 9:59 am
by Quest
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:00 am
by Quest
You're town, but I have no F'n idea what you're even trying to accomplish.
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:00 am
by Blake Belladonna
In post 98, Quest wrote:'cause it's who you are. You know that's a sub-optimal play in every way, you're not stupid.
On the contrary, actually.
I'd rather be out of the coalition because I'm not approaching this game to win with the coalition.
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:01 am
by Skygazer
the only time a coalition failed town lost
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:01 am
by Blake Belladonna
How many times did town properly prepare for the coalition failing?
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:02 am
by Quest
In post 102, Blake Belladonna wrote:I'd rather be out of the coalition because I'm not approaching this game to win with the coalition.
I'm approaching the game to play to my win condition; this is actively playing against yours for your own satisfaction.
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:02 am
by Skygazer
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:02 am
by implosion
hot take
let's try to get an all town coalition
and if we don't
then let's play the game as a 7:2 mountainous with the bonus info from the coalition
is this really that difficult why is there any goddamn strategy
there's only one actual reason to want to not be in the coalition, and that's if you consider yourself SO difficult to read/frequently misread as town that you assume you're going to be instantly lynched if a coalition fails with you in it. And even that's not necessarily a good reason.
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:03 am
by implosion
what in your opinion are the proper steps to prepare for this
we've already ensured we have sufficient supplies of water, spam, and canned soup
what else could we possibly need
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:04 am
by implosion
and if you say "a can opener" i swear to all fuck
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:04 am
by Blake Belladonna
A can opener
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:05 am
by implosion
activity overview is pretty funny right now.
27-26-21-18-5-4-2-2-1 postcount
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:08 am
by implosion
i do really want an answer to that question though
what do you mean that the town wasn't properly prepared? Do you mean that towns lost by forming coalitions in such a way that if they failed, they wouldn't get sufficient information to then solve the game? How, exactly, do you think we ought to form a coalition so as to get that information?
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:09 am
by Skygazer
in the last coalition game no lunch suggested a coalition of ppl of ppl who are town and easy to read lategame moreso than just town
i agree w that take
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:10 am
by implosion
In post 113, Skygazer wrote:in the last coalition game no lunch suggested a coalition of ppl of ppl who are town and easy to read lategame moreso than just town
i agree w that take
you townreading me yet?
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:12 am
by Skygazer
In post 114, implosion wrote: In post 113, Skygazer wrote:in the last coalition game no lunch suggested a coalition of ppl of ppl who are town and easy to read lategame moreso than just town
i agree w that take
you townreading me yet?
ehhh not sure how my posting got any better and i thought u were pushing for me to react to the hurt rather than actually scumreading my shitpost
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:14 am
by Blake Belladonna
In post 112, implosion wrote:i do really want an answer to that question though
what do you mean that the town wasn't properly prepared? Do you mean that towns lost by forming coalitions in such a way that if they failed, they wouldn't get sufficient information to then solve the game? How, exactly, do you think we ought to form a coalition so as to get that information?
I'm mostly just looking to make sure that both scum aren't in the coalition, because a scumflip outside of it is far more informative than a scumflip inside of it.
And, worst case scenario? I'm not all that worried about how people are reading me, I'm more interested in seeing how people get to their coalition reads so I have more to look at later on in the worse case scenario.
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:15 am
by Quest
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:16 am
by Skygazer
HURT: quest
HEAL: blake
mayb overthinking this but i dont think ank plays like this as scum after rereading pyp and boon XI
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:16 am
by Skygazer
dont think quest actually SRs me here after marathoning w me this morning
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:16 am
by Tim Goodman
I am starting to townread Blake's posting. Still happy with Skygazer, Northsidegal probably should do before I jump to any conclusions about her alignment. I'm not sure why you're so pessimistic about our odds of winning with coalition Blake, I think several people have been very towny this day phase and assuming my townreads keep being towny I only really need one additional slot to clear themselves (assuming that I myself am townread enough to be in coalition.)
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:17 am
by Quest
In post 119, Skygazer wrote:dont think quest actually SRs me here after marathoning w me this morning
That's a really bad (not good) read.
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:18 am
by Tim Goodman
I'm still not townreading Implosion. He feels more like he's trying to force himself to present as towny than that he's organically towny.
Not a strong read still but I feel like I should make that read known since several others seem to be townreading him.
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:18 am
by Blake Belladonna
I think people are confusing me planning around the coalition failing with me being pessimistic about it failing?
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:19 am
by Quest
In post 123, Blake Belladonna wrote:I think people are confusing me planning around the coalition failing with me being pessimistic about it failing?
I mean.