Mafiascum.net

In post 94, Lady 4 wrote:

In post 89, Lady 7 wrote:

In post 75, Lady 4 wrote:I read Dawn's posts while pretending the smileys weren't there and I now like them. Also, this is weak but don't think using them is a quality scum tactic at first glance. It's bound to rub some the wrong way.

People care about smiley use?

The use of smileys isn’t alignment indicative. That wasn’t even part of the critique.

Maybe not deliberately, but yes, I think small things like that affect people. I also think that avatars play into reads on a subconscious level.

At least one person mentioned it.

In post 96, Gentleman 3 wrote:

In post 92, Lady 8 wrote:It seems initially scummy and lessens your chances of getting asked to the dance because it seems like you're afraid of engaging in a read of a player.

Why does a joke suggest that she's afraid of making a read?

In post 97, Lady 9 wrote:

In post 94, Lady 4 wrote:

In post 89, Lady 7 wrote:

In post 75, Lady 4 wrote:I read Dawn's posts while pretending the smileys weren't there and I now like them. Also, this is weak but don't think using them is a quality scum tactic at first glance. It's bound to rub some the wrong way.

People care about smiley use?

The use of smileys isn’t alignment indicative. That wasn’t even part of the critique.

Maybe not deliberately, but yes, I think small things like that affect people. I also think that avatars play into reads on a subconscious level.

At least one person mentioned it.

I would think the smiley's would be a pre-decided roleplay quirk regardless of alignment. The potentially AI part was the asking if the quirk bothered anyone.

In post 99, Lady 8 wrote:That assumes it is a joke.

In post 98, Lady 5 wrote:
Well if the post came off scummy that’s entirely your point of view! ^_^
I seen it as a joke.
I didn’t think they were serious of their read so I didn’t feel a reason to take it seriously.
^_^
My bad if it came up bad, don’t shade me though based off of that.
Every Lady has an equal chance to get asked out! ^_^

In post 99, Lady 8 wrote:

In post 96, Gentleman 3 wrote:

In post 92, Lady 8 wrote:It seems initially scummy and lessens your chances of getting asked to the dance because it seems like you're afraid of engaging in a read of a player.

Why does a joke suggest that she's afraid of making a read?

That assumes it is a joke.

In post 101, Lady 7 wrote:If you’re referring to my scumread on g3 because he had too many birds in his avatar, that was a joke.

In post 102, Lady 9 wrote:

In post 96, Gentleman 3 wrote:

In post 92, Lady 8 wrote:It seems initially scummy and lessens your chances of getting asked to the dance because it seems like you're afraid of engaging in a read of a player.

Why does a joke suggest that she's afraid of making a read?

The question isn't directed at me, but I want to point out that it seems to me like Lady 5 is specifically avoiding making non-joke posts. She's ignored my more serious posts twice now. Joking is fine but she doesn't have any non-jokey content yet.

In post 104, Gentleman 3 wrote:

In post 99, Lady 8 wrote:That assumes it is a joke.

She literally just said it was...

In post 103, Lady 4 wrote:The more significant part of 75 was that I think their posts are town aside from this issue anyhow.

In post 106, Lady 5 wrote:

In post 99, Lady 8 wrote:

In post 96, Gentleman 3 wrote:

In post 92, Lady 8 wrote:It seems initially scummy and lessens your chances of getting asked to the dance because it seems like you're afraid of engaging in a read of a player.

Why does a joke suggest that she's afraid of making a read?

That assumes it is a joke.

Do you actually think I’m that stupid to believe a Neutral exists in this setup?

In post 110, Lady 8 wrote:

In post 104, Gentleman 3 wrote:

In post 99, Lady 8 wrote:That assumes it is a joke.

She literally just said it was...

Nevermind.

I was referencing that if she was scum, it would of been a nice cover up.

In post 109, Gentleman 6 wrote:

In post 102, Lady 9 wrote:

In post 96, Gentleman 3 wrote:

In post 92, Lady 8 wrote:It seems initially scummy and lessens your chances of getting asked to the dance because it seems like you're afraid of engaging in a read of a player.

Why does a joke suggest that she's afraid of making a read?

The question isn't directed at me, but I want to point out that it seems to me like Lady 5 is specifically avoiding making non-joke posts. She's ignored my more serious posts twice now. Joking is fine but she doesn't have any non-jokey content yet.

I interpret that apathy as townie. I think that scum care a lot more about getting town read than town do right now.

In post 109, Gentleman 6 wrote:I interpret that apathy as townie. I think that scum care a lot more about getting town read than town do right now.

In post 112, Lady 7 wrote:Hey! This feels like your real tone.

In post 116, Gentleman 3 wrote:

In post 112, Lady 7 wrote:Hey! This feels like your real tone.

That it does. Good call.

In post 106, Lady 5 wrote:

In post 99, Lady 8 wrote:

In post 96, Gentleman 3 wrote:

In post 92, Lady 8 wrote:It seems initially scummy and lessens your chances of getting asked to the dance because it seems like you're afraid of engaging in a read of a player.

Why does a joke suggest that she's afraid of making a read?

That assumes it is a joke.

Do you actually think I’m that stupid to believe a Neutral exists in this setup?

In post 115, Lady 9 wrote:

In post 109, Gentleman 6 wrote:I interpret that apathy as townie. I think that scum care a lot more about getting town read than town do right now.

I think the jokey/blending-in playstyle can be a strategy to get widely town read in itself though.

In post 117, Lady 5 wrote:

In post 116, Gentleman 3 wrote:

In post 112, Lady 7 wrote:Hey! This feels like your real tone.

That it does. Good call.

Now now. We don’t talk about our mains here!
We are here to dance and have fun!

In post 120, Lady 8 wrote:Why are we arguing whether smiley faces are AI?

In post 119, Lady 5 wrote:“69”

:3
I still can’t get over that funny theory.