Mafiascum.net

so nobody is going to actually answer my question?

In post 100, Wimpy wrote:so nobody is going to actually answer my question?

yes

In post 101, Elements wrote:

In post 100, Wimpy wrote:so nobody is going to actually answer my question?

yes

answered your question, so does that mean I lied?!

In post 100, Wimpy wrote:so nobody is going to actually answer my question?

What was your question?

In post 102, Elements wrote:so does that mean I lied?!

shit im sorry but we need to policy lynch all liars now GG we can end the day now

In post 102, Elements wrote:so does that mean I lied?!

shit im sorry but we need to policy lynch all liars now GG we can end the day now

In post 103, Elements wrote:What was your question?

In post 83, Wimpy wrote:why do people think quick hammers are bad? Like why is wake getting shit for that statement?

Apparently this is a bad answer. I can do better but...

I mean like if wake actually quick hammered somebody and we were having this discussion day 2 that would be something else but just cause somebody says they will doesn't mean they actually will.

The difference between what i am doing vs the people voting wake is I am not trying to pretend my vote is something more than it actually is. The votes on Wake are clearly policy votes. Just because you say you think he is scum doesn't mean he actually is and his stance on quick hammers doesn't confirm his alignment.

Can people at least be honest with what they are doing? Hiding your intentions makes me trust you less.

I'm gonna go back here
VOTE: wimpy

In post 102, Elements wrote:answered your question, so does that mean I lied?!

huh? Who said anything about lying?

In post 107, Wimpy wrote:Just because you say you think he is scum doesn't mean he actually

So you're saying we shouldn't vote our scum reads?

In post 106, Vorkuta wrote:Apparently this is a bad answer. I can do better but...
Spoiler:

so according to you, I am not allowed to accuse you of playing against your win condition because self voting in rvs doesn't mean you will self vote to end the day

BUT

You have issues with wake saying he will do something but have no idea if he actually will?


seems a bit hypocritical to me

In post 110, Elements wrote:So you're saying we shouldn't vote our scum reads?

idk how you got that from what I said

In post 108, Elements wrote:I'm gonna go back here
VOTE: wimpy

תmy vote is better than yours

In post 112, Wimpy wrote:

In post 110, Elements wrote:So you're saying we shouldn't vote our scum reads?

idk how you got that from what I said

You said you don't like the votes on wake because they're policy votes. So you don't think they should be voting wake. They say they scum read wake. Ergo you don't think they should be voting their scum read.

In post 111, Wimpy wrote:You have issues with wake saying he will do something but have no idea if he actually will?

So @wimpy- what's the difference between my self!vote (which is a joke proclamation look: UNVOTE: I'm following my wincon!)
and wake's "im going to lol quickhammer" proclamation

VOTE: Vork oops im anti wincon again

Just ignore wimpy you are not going anywhere with this

And I've already justified how I think my self-vote moves game progression which is a net-win for my wincon.
But let's keep on ignoring that

Literally going in circles

Fair

In post 80, Vorkuta wrote:People who need to post more and I'm going to bug in a bit
{salad, Zote, Looker, almidia}

@you guys- your 2 cents please and thank you

In post 114, Elements wrote:You said you don't like the votes on wake because they're policy votes. So you don't think they should be voting wake. They say they scum read wake. Ergo you don't think they should be voting their scum read.

I think you are reaching too hard here.

Wake's statement, if he actually goes through with it is anti-town. Him making that statement doesn't make him scum and I don't believe anyone legit scum reads wake based on that statement alone.

In post 116, Saudade wrote:Just ignore wimpy you are not going anywhere with this

I don't think people need to ignore me but we should definitely stop talking about policy lynch voting.

VC 1.1

Saudade (2):

Saladman27, Looker

Vorkuta (2):

Vorkuta, Wimpy

Wake88 (2):

Saudade, profii

Wimpy (1):

Elements

Saladman27 (1):

UltimatePlank

Not voting (3):

Zote the Mighty, Wake88, alimdia

With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch

Deadline: (expired on 2019-11-18 03:00:00)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKsRc8GONrI

In post 122, Montosh wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKsRc8GONrI

"Venetian Snares - Can't Vote for Yourself V1"