Mafiascum.net

In post 93, alimdia wrote:Why does every non newbie game that I play start off with a couple of people with pre-game relationship joking around and cluttering the few couple pages with fluff?

Tbh there were like 3 posts were Mena and I were like "haha we were scum together in the past game"

The rest has been me/Wimpy/Mena calling eachother scum

And trust me i do not have any pre-game relationship with Wimpy

VOTE: menal

For saying I’m scum for not providing logical reasons (which is a lie) Buy is implying I’m scum without providing any reason at all

In post 93, alimdia wrote:Why does every non newbie game that I play start off with a couple of people with pre-game relationship joking around and cluttering the few couple pages with fluff?

People love to pick fights with me for some reason. Probably cause I’m stubborn and love to argue. I won’t be arguing with either of these chaps anymore though

In post 61, Datisi wrote:

In post 53, Wimpy wrote:I bet he doesn’t have anything close to a legit reason for voting me outside of perceived omgus that is.

I mean the longer you drag the burger discussion on
The less time we spend sorting
Which is anti-town

But sure

I said why I think you're scum tho

You're dragging on pointless discussions

And atm it's also "lol ur SRing me not my problem" additiude

Which help absolutely nobody

In post 50, Menalque wrote:Datisi if ur scum can u do me a favour and just kill me tonight so I don’t have to sort u?

All this does is cause all sorts of WIFOM

In post 98, Menalque wrote:

In post 39, Menalque wrote:I think I lightly SL wimpy

In post 40, Menalque wrote:Or like that was the scummiest entrance

In post 42, Menalque wrote:Trying a lil bit too hard for nonchalance

In post 94, Menalque wrote:

In post 92, Wimpy wrote:

In post 88, Menalque wrote:Oh actually maybe they are but the problem is that like the reasons don’t make any sense

That’s not my problem.

This is very much your problem bc it looks a lot like you’re calling scum with no logical reason to do so

This is basically your entire 'case'? The foundation is 'scummiest entrance' and ... while Wimpy has a warped understanding of the rules, that doesn't make it scummy

p.s. I meant datisi and Menalque pre-game relationship, not you wimpy

In post 40, Menalque wrote:Or like that was the scummiest entrance

No logical explanation for why this statement was made.

No, you’ve provided reasons that don’t make sense, there’s a difference

If I say “wimpy is scum because the big blue puffer fish in the sky told me so” that’s a reason but it’s not a good one and it’s quite clearly made up

If I say “wimpy is scum because his tone is super insecure” then that’s a logical reason even if someone disagrees with me

In post 104, alimdia wrote:p.s. I meant datisi and Menalque pre-game relationship, not you wimpy

We had how many? 3 posts joking around? Before someone called me scum and rulebreaker for that?

Like
3 posts vs 3+ pages

In post 40, Menalque wrote:Or like that was the scummiest entrance

In post 42, Menalque wrote:Trying a lil bit too hard for nonchalance

In post 80, Menalque wrote:Yeah I think wimpy is actually scum

Calls me scum and never explains why.

So he’s either scum himself or a giant hypocrite. Time will tell but I’ll gladly go 1 v 1 against the guy who can’t even articulate why yet says my articulations aren’t logical.

In post 108, Menalque wrote:

In post 40, Menalque wrote:Or like that was the scummiest entrance

In post 42, Menalque wrote:Trying a lil bit too hard for nonchalance

That’s an actual example of illogical reasoning not mine. Nice try chap

In post 98, Menalque wrote:

In post 39, Menalque wrote:I think I lightly SL wimpy

In post 40, Menalque wrote:Or like that was the scummiest entrance

In post 42, Menalque wrote:Trying a lil bit too hard for nonchalance

In post 94, Menalque wrote:

In post 92, Wimpy wrote:

In post 88, Menalque wrote:Oh actually maybe they are but the problem is that like the reasons don’t make any sense

That’s not my problem.

This is very much your problem bc it looks a lot like you’re calling scum with no logical reason to do so

Wimpy are you blind

In post 107, Datisi wrote:

In post 104, alimdia wrote:p.s. I meant datisi and Menalque pre-game relationship, not you wimpy

We had how many? 3 posts joking around? Before someone called me scum and rulebreaker for that?

Like
3 posts vs 3+ pages

Okay half a page then. from 24 to around 38.

There was also half a page of burger stuff but that didn't come off knowing each other before this game (I think)

I think we cleared up that it doesn't break the rules

In post 27, Wimpy wrote:

In post 23, Datisi wrote:Maybe y'all should stick to salads

VOTE: Datisi

In post 47, Wimpy wrote:It was a serious vote

Votes dats and claims serious vote

In post 53, Wimpy wrote:

In post 49, Menalque wrote:Interesting

Why was it serious?

Cause I dislike when people come in and reference past games and vote them for it. It violates site rules and is scummy.

I bet he doesn’t have anything close to a legit reason for voting me outside of perceived omgus that is.

Uses this post to explain why he thought it was a scummy thing to do. So it wasn’t serious just bc he wanted to policy dats but because he thought there was actual scum motivation there from her

But the reasons for why it’s scummy don’t make sense and aren’t elaborated on when pressed

Wait a second

How is "trying too hard to be nonchalant" illogical

But "referencing past games is awkward and therefore scummy" not illogical

Like

In post 98, Menalque wrote:

In post 39, Menalque wrote:I think I lightly SL wimpy

In post 40, Menalque wrote:Or like that was the scummiest entrance

In post 42, Menalque wrote:Trying a lil bit too hard for nonchalance

In post 94, Menalque wrote:

In post 92, Wimpy wrote:

In post 88, Menalque wrote:Oh actually maybe they are but the problem is that like the reasons don’t make any sense

That’s not my problem.

This is very much your problem bc it looks a lot like you’re calling scum with no logical reason to do so

This case is airtight. Well done Sherlock we caught the scum

VOTE: Wimpy [WARNING: SARCASM USED]

Wait a second...
VOTE: Mena

In post 106, Menalque wrote:No, you’ve provided reasons that don’t make sense, there’s a difference

They make sense to me. I don’t need them to make sense to you.

But you haven’t provided reasons for why I’m scum, logical or illogical

Btw I didn't vote you because of your shit case against Wimpy. I voted you because of the original quote where I voted you.

But looks like we're getting some content here even if it's 90% fluff.

In post 116, Wimpy wrote:But you haven’t provided reasons for why I’m scum, logical or illogical

you literally just called his reasoning illogical how do you now say he didn't provide any

I'm actually just gonna step back and let the other people chime in with their thoughts before this becomes a 10 page pool of fluff and people don't bother reading half of it.

In post 110, Wimpy wrote:

In post 108, Menalque wrote:

In post 40, Menalque wrote:Or like that was the scummiest entrance

In post 42, Menalque wrote:Trying a lil bit too hard for nonchalance

That’s an actual example of illogical reasoning not mine.

Nice try chap

In post 116, Wimpy wrote:

In post 106, Menalque wrote:No, you’ve provided reasons that don’t make sense, there’s a difference

They make sense to me. I don’t need them to make sense to you.

But you haven’t provided reasons for why I’m scum, logical or illogical

Like what

In post 106, Menalque wrote:If I say “wimpy is scum because his tone is super insecure” then that’s a logical reason even if someone disagrees with me

That reason is illogical cause you can’t determine tone. I’m playing a game and having fun and you probably can’t pick up my humor.

I’ve provided a logical reason, you just disagreed with.

You can’t say my reason is illogical, you can just say you disagree with it because I assure you my reasons for my votes have all been very logical

In post 111, Datisi wrote:Wimpy are you blind

None of those explain why that makes me scum. None of those are even remotely logical

In post 62, Wimpy wrote:

In post 57, Datisi wrote:Game specific site rule 2.: Do not bring outside influences into the game - this includes threats, bribes, wagers, promises, "trust tells", alliances, etc.

Using knowledge from previous games is perfectly acceptable

, but try not to carry grudges from one game to another.

Like call me scummy for it i don't give a shit but don't call me a cheater.

I did call you scummy for it.

This isn’t a cogent point. It’s being evasive — not “oh yeah my bad I thought you were bending the rules and and that that was a scum motivated action” but instead just trying to respond to half the statement

In post 65, Wimpy wrote:The more datsi posts the better I feel about my vote. It’s like he doesn’t like the attention and he doesn’t know how to handle it.

Tries to cite this as an example for how he explained why datisi is scummy despite not being comfortable with attention being NAI (and I disagree that it’s true)

In post 72, Wimpy wrote:

In post 68, Menalque wrote:Why do u think datisi is scum?

I’ve explained my thoughts. Why are you asking a redundant question?

So wimpy explained his thoughts but not in a way that explained why he was making a serious vote on page 2 for dats. When pushed on the logic he makes up something about her play being against the rules, when he gets closed on that he’s evasive.

He’s generally over defensive in response to being pushed, and his explanations don’t make sense.

In post 111, Datisi wrote:Wimpy are you blind

Also on this note I’ll log off. I have a feeling things will get more hostile than this and I do not want more hostility