https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
Well I don’t know you so I’m going on the general way new players play.In post 98, Farkran wrote:You placed a vote on me, so that person would be meIn post 96, Alchemist21 wrote:Depends on the person.In post 82, Farkran wrote:@alchemist, same question, how much do you rely on meta to gamesolve?
RVS voting GE for having 4 votes (idk)In post 97, Farkran wrote:Very interested in your reasoning about thisIn post 94, TemporalLich wrote: Bitmap has a lot of scum equity
Bad read... not sure if it comes from scum though. Read bitmap iso again and come back to confirm this read please?In post 101, TemporalLich wrote:RVS voting GE for having 4 votes (idk)In post 97, Farkran wrote:Very interested in your reasoning about thisIn post 94, TemporalLich wrote: Bitmap has a lot of scum equity
The big reason is this:
Jumping off the Farkwagon solely because I hopped on it, which is sorta attacking me to defend Farkran and also a inverse OMGUS, and then admitting that I am only a nullread
In post 103, TemporalLich wrote:Alchemist is a townlean for me mostly because he seems town-motivated
i just want to appreciate this all in one post
I want your reads in my every hole pleaseIn post 108, Severa wrote:Ok there's two ways we can play this
Do y'all want the way that wins more reliably or the one that involves less of me shoving my reads down your throats.
Go read 79, 80, and 92.In post 105, Farkran wrote:Bad read... not sure if it comes from scum though. Read bitmap iso again and come back to confirm this read please?In post 101, TemporalLich wrote:RVS voting GE for having 4 votes (idk)In post 97, Farkran wrote:Very interested in your reasoning about thisIn post 94, TemporalLich wrote: Bitmap has a lot of scum equity
The big reason is this:
Jumping off the Farkwagon solely because I hopped on it, which is sorta attacking me to defend Farkran and also a inverse OMGUS, and then admitting that I am only a nullread
Do I though?In post 104, Chemist1422 wrote:Alchemist exists
Ok that’s... probably more suggestive than we want in our game threads.In post 109, Farkran wrote:I want your reads in my every hole pleaseIn post 108, Severa wrote:Ok there's two ways we can play this
Do y'all want the way that wins more reliably or the one that involves less of me shoving my reads down your throats.
So you're basing your scumread of Bitmap on the assumption that i am scum, and the both of us want to push a "mis"lynch on you.
In post 112, Alchemist21 wrote:Ok that’s... probably more suggestive than we want in our game threads.In post 109, Farkran wrote:Sorry if i crossed a line, reads are nothing obscene though, nor are my holesIn post 108, Severa wrote:Ok there's two ways we can play this
Do y'all want the way that wins more reliably or the one that involves less of me shoving my reads down your throats.
I want your reads in my every hole please
But hey, you do you.
Not gonna lie I’m tempted to take the former option just because I still don’t fully understand these mechanics.In post 108, Severa wrote:Ok there's two ways we can play this
Do y'all want the way that wins more reliably or the one that involves less of me shoving my reads down your throats.
What is the point of this?In post 116, TemporalLich wrote:I have a memoriae that doesn't help scum at all, ftr
it's called a soft claim and it helps in case I get to L-3In post 120, Severa wrote:What is the point of this?In post 116, TemporalLich wrote:I have a memoriae that doesn't help scum at all, ftr
Most people would be able to hammer with one vote at that pointIn post 123, Sujimichi wrote:Why L-3?