Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2019 1:05 am
I can elaborate on it if needed, but I feel like town would at least cast a vote.In post 105, skitter30 wrote:Why do you think that's more likely than newbtown who isnt sure how to interact/engage with the game?
Alright, please elaborate.In post 106, Map Wolf wrote:I can elaborate on it if needed, but I feel like town would at least cast a vote.In post 105, skitter30 wrote:Why do you think that's more likely than newbtown who isnt sure how to interact/engage with the game?
No? Not necesaarily? I for one will often not vote for a while day1 sometimes.In post 106, Map Wolf wrote:I can elaborate on it if needed, but I feel like town would at least cast a vote.In post 105, skitter30 wrote:Why do you think that's more likely than newbtown who isnt sure how to interact/engage with the game?
Ok do you have any suspicions of anyone yet? Or is there anyone you're liking so far? It's ok if you're not sure of the read or if its only a gut feelingIn post 108, Kanna wrote:I'm sorry I haven't said anything meaningful, it's not on purpose. At this point, I just really don't know who is most likely to be scum.
I'm suspicious of almost everyone actually. Many people in this game are well guarded in a way that I have trouble trusting.In post 111, skitter30 wrote:Ok do you have any suspicions of anyone yet? Or is there anyone you're liking so far? It's ok if you're not sure of the read or if its only a gut feelingIn post 108, Kanna wrote:I'm sorry I haven't said anything meaningful, it's not on purpose. At this point, I just really don't know who is most likely to be scum.
I don’t agree I’ve been vague. I’ve tried my best to express what I’m thinking and I can't be any more "certain" because I'm not sure.In post 115, Uncrowned wrote:So ideally then you'd want to put your vote on someone to at least attempt to generate discussion about that slot.
I think you're being a little vague and that might indicate that you're not taking scumhunting all that seriously.
Can I ask why you’re voting for me? Is it because you think I'm not being helpful or do you think I'm scum?
Okay sure. I can see that being the case if town.In post 108, Kanna wrote:I'm sorry I haven't said anything meaningful, it's not on purpose. At this point, I just really don't know who is most likely to be scum.
So the reason why I said that you were "probably scum" is because of the lack of any reaction to my kind of out there vote. As for why I scumread you? I just wanted to see your reaction to it.In post 109, Kanna wrote:Alright, please elaborate.
Sorry, miswording on my part but what I wanted you to elaborate on was "why town would at least cast a vote."In post 121, Map Wolf wrote:Okay sure. I can see that being the case if town.In post 108, Kanna wrote:I'm sorry I haven't said anything meaningful, it's not on purpose. At this point, I just really don't know who is most likely to be scum.So the reason why I said that you were "probably scum" is because of the lack of any reaction to my kind of out there vote. As for why I scumread you? I just wanted to see your reaction to it.In post 109, Kanna wrote:Alright, please elaborate.
In post 107, Uncrowned wrote:That actually reminds me of my newbie scum buddy in Newb 1963 that initially didnt want to cast their vote
Not saying it's necessarily the same thing here buuuuuut its definitely possible
In post 115, Uncrowned wrote:So ideally then you'd want to put your vote on someone to at least attempt to generate discussion about that slot.
I think you're being a little vague and that might indicate that you're not taking scumhunting all that seriously.
Hmm I feel like you're shading me in bad faith. VOTE: UncrownedIn post 120, Uncrowned wrote:Also from what I know, it's easier for scum to TL than it is for them to SL, as they know who's innocent and who isn't, hence they have to put more effort in / sometimes "reach" to show that they're scumhunting.