Page 5 of 81

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 1:57 am
by gobbledygook
VC 1.1
Looker
EeveeLution Army
Wimpy
Ame
Luca Blight
Alchemist21 (2) - insomnia, Wimpy
Chara
Macabre (1) - Alchemist21
insomnia (1) - AaronFrost
JTheophrastus Bartholomew (3) - profii, Macabre, Egix96
profii (2) - Chara, Ame
AaronFrost
Egix96 (1) - JTheophrastus Bartholomew


Not Voting
(4) — Looker, EeveeLution Army, Luca Blight,

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

Deadline
: (expired on 2020-01-24 16:00:00)[/color]

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:01 am
by Alchemist21
@Ame
Why did you vote Profii?[/b]

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 3:46 am
by EeveeLution Army
In post 97, profii wrote:
In post 88, insomnia wrote:Town points for you noticing it too tho.
Maybe this is because I played in a game where Wimpy replaced out after a protracted argument so I have prior experience...

...But I feel like if you just read the thread it was obvious that Wimpy did not want to invite pressure on himself. I guess my experience of Wimpy made me think "he knows he is liable to arguing and its negative" rather than "he doenst want pressure because he is noob-scum who might slip, must scum read this!"

The point is, no matter which way you justify it, Alch did not come to the obvious conclusion of "wimpy would prefer less pressure" - the reason is irrelevant.

I guess you could kinda say if Alch declares Wimpy as able to deal with pressure, he might encourage another player to pressure Wimpy, which might have an overall negative impact on gamestate if it sets something off, which is pro scum...

but that is obviously massively convoluted and we have seen straight through it, so I can't see it as something someone would think of as optimal scum play.

So I'm not giving scum points out. I'm just confused about it.

But by the same token, I dont feel like you issuing me town points is really warranted because I feel it was obvious that Wimpy did not want pressure... are you trying to pocket me? :twisted:

it really depends on if he actually knew it would set him off in that scenario

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 5:16 am
by Ame
In post 79, Alchemist21 wrote: As for Wimpy, I didn’t like the “Hi” entrance
What didn't you like about it?
In post 82, insomnia wrote:For Ame, I had an initial scum read on profii, nothing too strong, just a gut feeling upon seeing his first vote.
What about it do you think gave you that reaction?

Also, what did you mean by it's not much left?

In post 101, Alchemist21 wrote:
@Ame
Why did you vote Profii?
It's a minor impression I get from a couple of his posts, which feel off beat. In particular this here:
In post 28, insomnia wrote:No! I can’t trust you Wimpy!
No high fives until I rest assured that you are a brother and not a traitor.
In post 29, profii wrote:what about the sista's ?
It struck me as odd to say since somni was using 'brother' in the singular sense toward Wimpy. It would have been weird for somni to say: "No high fives until I rest assured that you are a brother or a sister and not a traitor."

This isn't scummy, but it is a tad bit off, and gives me the impression that profii is anxious to establish rapport with somni.

This was also off:
In post 65, profii wrote:
In post 64, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 57, insomnia wrote:The question still doesn't help you figure him out though.
It tells me if he’s the type of player to respond poorly to pressure or not which is important to know if he is. His response tells me he’s not that type of player.
Have you played with wimpy before?
In post 71, profii wrote:
In post 70, Alchemist21 wrote: No.
I get why insomnia is coming from but I guess its ok to ask the question you asked if you dont know someone
It's fairly obvious from your #64 that you hadn't played with Wimpy, so this added no value and comes off to me as pseudoengagement.


That was the reasoning at the time of my post, but while we're on the subject, this also gives me the same vibes:
In post 97, profii wrote:But by the same token, I dont feel like you issuing me town points is really warranted because I feel it was obvious that Wimpy did not want pressure... are you trying to pocket me? :twisted:
The pocket line reads artificial to me, giving me a similar impression as the interaction with somni above. Somni wasn't awarding him town points because he came to the correct conclusion about Wimpy; he awarded him points for making note of Alchemist coming to the
wrong
conclusion. So how are the town points unwarranted?

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 5:45 am
by Macabre
Divination incoming. Transmission received. The spirits are revealing that there is only one traitor in this game. Psycho!

Image

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 5:46 am
by Alchemist21
In post 103, Ame wrote:What didn't you like about it?
It was short and lacked an RVS vote.

As for the Profii vote, that makes sense. Profii’s actually giving me weird vibes too because they’ll say something about either Insomnia or myself that looks like they’re trying to understand both of our viewpoints but then they seem to doubtcast their own conclusions and I can’t tell if they’re actually confused or trying to play both sides of the discussion without having to commit to a stance on either of us.

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 5:47 am
by Macabre
In post 77, Looker wrote:Everyone looks exactly the same; how can you make heads or tails out of them?
You have more heads than tails, Hydra. Brains!

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 5:48 am
by Wimpy
In post 105, Alchemist21 wrote:It was short and lacked an RVS vote.
And?

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 5:49 am
by Macabre
In post 78, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 76, Ame wrote:@Alchemist, what do you think of this post?
I don’t think anything of it. I don’t really think anything of Macabre’s post either but I thought the vote might get us out of RVS.
Does this Colonel truly announce to his people that he is expediting this process from page 1? Is this the work of a good man, or a destructive force? Ponder!

Image

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 5:50 am
by Alchemist21
In post 107, Wimpy wrote:
In post 105, Alchemist21 wrote:It was short and lacked an RVS vote.
And?
It seemed like the kind of entrance nervous scum wanting to stay out of the spotlight would make.

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 5:58 am
by Macabre
In post 91, insomnia wrote:The TMI'd him part comes from Alchemist not reading his posts, which I get from him reaching the wrong conclusion. Not once was there a note about Wimpy responding easily to pressure.
At what point does this sleepy boy believe this Colonel may have slipped up? Inquiry!

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 6:05 am
by Wimpy
In post 109, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 107, Wimpy wrote:
In post 105, Alchemist21 wrote:It was short and lacked an RVS vote.
And?
It seemed like the kind of entrance nervous scum wanting to stay out of the spotlight would make.
except lots of players do that. Some people just aren't a fan of rvs.

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 6:09 am
by Macabre
Burger, please explain your reasoning to cast this Colonel to the fire! Urgency!

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 6:13 am
by Macabre
This crow did not understand the basis for the beliefs of this scarf boy, most definitely the suffering of the chimera. However! It all falls into place if we believe this sleepy boy sleeps with the chimera! Revelation!

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 6:15 am
by Wimpy
In post 112, Macabre wrote:Burger, please explain your reasoning to cast this Colonel to the fire! Urgency!
please speak normally and I will answer your question. I don't understand what you are asking and I am not really in the mood for fake altered speech.

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 6:16 am
by Alchemist21
In post 113, Macabre wrote:It all falls into place if we believe this sleepy boy sleeps with the chimera! Revelation!
Does this mean you think Wimpy is bussing me?

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 6:17 am
by Macabre
In post 90, Wimpy wrote:VOTE: alchemist
Nothing better atm.
Your mouth is too full, you cannot speak. Glutton! Sinner! You will destroy us all! Panic!

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 6:21 am
by Macabre
In post 115, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 113, Macabre wrote:It all falls into place if we believe this sleepy boy sleeps with the chimera! Revelation!
Does this mean you think Wimpy is bussing me?
You are no flame alchemist, you are a wind alchemist. For you have knocked the wind out of me. Foul!

Image

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 6:23 am
by Macabre
In post 72, Wimpy wrote:
In post 64, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 57, insomnia wrote:The question still doesn't help you figure him out though.
It tells me if he’s the type of player to respond poorly to pressure or not which is important to know if he is. His response tells me he’s not that type of player.
Oh no I am
This crow certainly does believe that this sort of response could be the work of shady people. Therefore! Knowing in which way this sleepy boy views this pair is of great importance.

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 6:24 am
by Macabre
However! The Colonel, has, in the crow's third eye, quoted the wrong post! In a fit of urgency? Did they see the writing that was on the wall? The knowledge not meant to be known? Pre-emption! Conspiracy!

VOTE: Alchemist21

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 6:27 am
by Wimpy
VOTE: macbre

I won’t remove my vote until he drops this schtick

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 6:30 am
by Macabre
You are the most lazy burger. Sinner. Set out to destroy us all. Nothingburger!

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 6:38 am
by Alchemist21
I don’t blame Wimpy. You’re very difficult to understand.
Even now I still don’t know the answer to what I asked in because instead of a simple yes or no you act like
I
confused
you
and then voted me for quoting the wrong post. Like what post did you expect me to quote?


I just realized sleepy boy meant insomnia not Wimpy. See these code names make everything confusing and I’m still not sure if Chimera referred to me or not.

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 6:39 am
by insomnia
In post 120, Wimpy wrote:VOTE: macbre

I won’t remove my vote until he drops this schtick
I have bad news for you

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 6:39 am
by Wimpy
In post 123, insomnia wrote:
In post 120, Wimpy wrote:VOTE: macbre

I won’t remove my vote until he drops this schtick
I have bad news for you
What’s that?