(1:55:11 AM) ahallucinogenic: it's ok drench
(1:55:21 AM) ahallucinogenic: it's perfectly normal for young children to walk in on their parents making love
(1:55:31 AM) Drench394: i can't wait
JamesThePhox wrote:CKD: I know. And my response to your vote was pretty bullshit too.
are you saying that my vote was bull shit or that your response to my voe is bull shit?
Flameaxe wrote:Yes, you are fishing. Think about it, and stop being retarded.
Unvote, Vote: MafiaSSK
Stop protecting your buddy, scum.
SSK was not fishing. We have a day start on an open set up, how is SSK fishing and how was it worth a vote?
Lawrencelot wrote:
Unvote; Vote: Flameaxe
. Like pickemgenius, he is playing a bit... how do you call it... not very serious. But peg's role sucks so his behaviour is explainable.
“Not very serious”…so do you think he is playing scummy? Why is it ok for one player to be not serious but another to be? Seems to me that PEG’s role would give him the opportunity to really be aggressive during the day..why does his role suck?
. Like pickemgenius, he is playing a bit... how do you call it... not very serious. But peg's role sucks so his behaviour is explainable.
“Not very serious”…so do you think he is playing scummy? Why is it ok for one player to be not serious but another to be? Seems to me that PEG’s role would give him the opportunity to really be aggressive during the day..why does his role suck?
If Flameaxe always plays like this, it is probably not scummy, but I don't know. Peg's role either sucks (as scum) or does not suck (as town), but if his role does not suck it does not allow him to play aggressively, so you're basically saying a contradiction. I often see people play less serious if their role is less... interesting.
Leaving mafiascum temporarily or not due to circumstances
I almost chose PEG's role. The only reason I didnt was because of the power of the watcher(s) from Small Town Heroes game..side note (mafia thoroughly gave me a thrashing)..
I dont see a contradiction..I have seen many games where people who are aggressive are targetted and most of the time lynched rather quickly...PEG's role, makes people think twice before hammering. You can bet your ass if PEG is town, mafia or the SK wont hammer. If he is scum, anyone will be scared of hammering.
this gives him a ton of freedom and I dont think his role sucks at all.
I dont think he should be given a "look over" because his play is weak and contentless and you (and PEG) deem is role as sucky...
Why does PEG's role make people think twice before hammering? Why would anyone be scared of hammering him? The only reason I could think for this is because his role sucks, but you say his role doesn't suck.
Leaving mafiascum temporarily or not due to circumstances
curiouskarmadog wrote:
my mistake...yeah PEG role does suck, and I guess it would benefit him (scum or town) to stay low and not really make stances on things.
This gives me
more
of a reason to take stances on things, cause if I get NK'ed the town doesnt lose a "power" role...
(1:55:11 AM) ahallucinogenic: it's ok drench
(1:55:21 AM) ahallucinogenic: it's perfectly normal for young children to walk in on their parents making love
(1:55:31 AM) Drench394: i can't wait
curiouskarmadog wrote:
my mistake...yeah PEG role does suck, and I guess it would benefit him (scum or town) to stay low and not really make stances on things.
This gives me
more
of a reason to take stances on things, cause if I get NK'ed the town doesnt lose a "power" role...
yeah i agree. just because you have a bad role doesn't mean you don't have to play..
It's not going to help trying to lynch the best/worst roles, what have to go off of right now is how people act following the jokearound stage. I'd suggest going through the assholes first then the non-contributing lurkers.
Anatole Kuragin wrote:It's not going to help trying to lynch the best/worst roles, what have to go off of right now is how people act following the jokearound stage. I'd suggest going through the assholes first then the non-contributing lurkers.
Dang, I like your style.
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
Anatole Kuragin wrote:It's not going to help trying to lynch the best/worst roles, what have to go off of right now is how people act following the jokearound stage. I'd suggest going through the assholes first then the non-contributing lurkers.
Anatole Kuragin wrote:It's not going to help trying to lynch the best/worst roles, what have to go off of right now is how people act following the jokearound stage. I'd suggest going through the assholes first then the non-contributing lurkers.
You will get nowhere on this site.
So like... I think you're an asshole for inferring that there are assholes here. So by your logic we have to go through (wtf does that mean) you.
p.s. "going through" assholes and non con lurkers is fucking terrible. YOU LYNCH WHO THE SCUMMIEST ALWAYS.
fuck people(gorrad,AK). lynching non con lurkers and assholes isnt how you win games.... fucking a.
(1:55:11 AM) ahallucinogenic: it's ok drench
(1:55:21 AM) ahallucinogenic: it's perfectly normal for young children to walk in on their parents making love
(1:55:31 AM) Drench394: i can't wait
Did I say I agree with him? I don't. I just like his style. He's not standing for the BS that some players continually put out, yourself notably among them, PEG.
AK, please read the Wiki article on Team Asshat.
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
Gorrad wrote:Did I say I agree with him? I don't. I just like his style. He's not standing for the BS that some players continually put out, yourself notably among them, PEG.
Anatole Kuragin wrote:It's not going to help trying to lynch the best/worst roles, what have to go off of right now is how people act following the jokearound stage. I'd suggest going through the assholes first then the non-contributing lurkers.
Dang, I like your style.
Gorrad wrote:Did I say I agree with him? I don't. I just like his style. He's not standing for the BS that some players continually put out, yourself notably among them, PEG.
AK, please read the Wiki article on Team Asshat.
1. You like his style but don't agree with it? PUH LEEZE
fuck dude srsly.
2. There's a reason for Team Asshat you know.... it was mainly formed because of people like you.
3. my style has produced great results...i'm not fucking changing it.
(1:55:11 AM) ahallucinogenic: it's ok drench
(1:55:21 AM) ahallucinogenic: it's perfectly normal for young children to walk in on their parents making love
(1:55:31 AM) Drench394: i can't wait
He's got the right idea. It just isn't aplicable with Asshat around.
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning