Page 5 of 56

Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2020 12:34 pm
by Datisi
Official Vote Count 1.04
Image

With 9 votes in play, it takes 5 to lynch.

Lynching
Ame
(2): Iconeum, Hectic
Compath
(1): Luca Blight
Luca Blight
(1): Kanna
Hectic
(1): Compath
clidd
(1): Ame
Slaxx
(1): DrDolittle

Not Voting
(2): Slaxx, clidd

Deadline:
(expired on 2020-02-26 02:15:00).

Mod notes:
  • Iconeum standing V/LA weekends.
[/area]

Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2020 12:36 pm
by Compath
In post 62, Ame wrote:
In post 55, Iconeum wrote:
In post 53, Ame wrote:Thinking about it, if you don't answer the questions in one go, their validity is compromised.
backtracking because you don't wanna answer me huh?
What do you mean? If you answer them as a group, I'll respond to you. Tit for tat. Every time someone's done this little game of avoiding my questions, they've been scum because they fear that I'll actually be able to distinguish them. There's literally no town motive for avoiding my questions, especially if it will help you sort me. But you're more interested in making a case than actually sorting me.
Some people just dislike RQS. It's mostly just a preference thing. I've comfortably participated in RQS before as scum.

It's not really difficult to answer most RQS questions. I don't believe they're particularly AI either.

Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2020 12:38 pm
by Compath
In post 74, DrDolittle wrote:VOTE: slaxxx
feelin decent about compath rn actually
What changed in between your "serious" vote and here? I don't think I posted any real content in between your "serious" vote and your change of mind.

Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2020 12:39 pm
by Compath
In post 81, Hectic wrote:trainee "trainee" trainee here because Officer "Officer" Officer is now off duty!

normally i'm just assigned to do paperwork and file cabinets around here, so i'm looking forward to doing some real field work! first, props to the mod for 4 PageTop VCs in a row! secondly, i find Ame intentionally ignoring questions regarding Compath very strange, but i think i can see where she's going with her RQS thing which might be civilian-indicative. we shall see! slaxx has had good takes so far other than his DDL read where it didn't look like to me that DDL was frustrated from that post.
DDL, so was your original vote on compath serious or not?

that's all for now!

Image
Isn't Team Rocket supposed to be scum?

Is trainee "trainee" trainee like the evil side of Officer "Officer" Officer?

Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2020 12:45 pm
by Compath
Clidd feels like he's trying too hard to be honest.

@Clidd - How is your Iconeum read different from the null reads you have on Luca and DDL?

Why did you basically completely ignore slaxx?

Why do you need something to "radically" change your opinion in order to not scumread Ame, despite stating that you only find them to be slightly suspicious?

Why is playing a character town-indicative for Hectic? In my opinion, it'd be scum-indicative because he gets to hide behind the character that he's playing.

What specifically did you find scummy in Kanna/my RQS answers? Did you find the fact that we quickly complied with RQS to be scummy, or something else?

Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2020 12:52 pm
by clidd
In post 93, Ame wrote:Yes, as soon as I get answers from Clidd and I can knee em :3
Hum, no.

Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2020 12:52 pm
by clidd
In post 98, Kanna wrote:Ok wait, I just noticed something about clidd's wall. Why wasn't slaxx included?
I forgot about him, did the post quickly.

Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2020 12:53 pm
by clidd
In post 104, Compath wrote:Clidd feels like he's trying too hard to be honest.

@Clidd - How is your Iconeum read different from the null reads you have on Luca and DDL?

Why did you basically completely ignore slaxx?

Why do you need something to "radically" change your opinion in order to not scumread Ame, despite stating that you only find them to be slightly suspicious?

Why is playing a character town-indicative for Hectic? In my opinion, it'd be scum-indicative because he gets to hide behind the character that he's playing.

What specifically did you find scummy in Kanna/my RQS answers? Did you find the fact that we quickly complied with RQS to be scummy, or something else?
You probably haven't played with me before, but that's not even close to trying. I will answer you as soon as I have time, considering that I am focused on another eventuality at the moment.

Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2020 12:55 pm
by clidd
Thinking again, maybe I'll answer your questionnaire, Ame. But it comes into the condition that I stipulated above.

Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2020 1:01 pm
by Compath
Town the worst - My favorite duckling. Quack! :)
Kanna - Questioning others and actively generating content. They're participating in interactions that they don't really need to.
Hectic - Still a quality memer, like usual. Despite putting up an act as this Officer "Officer" Officer guy, he feels surprisingly natural.
Iconeum - Gut, and also sort of meta read. Asking questions and actively pressuring Ame. Ame - Doubles down on the "Answer my RQS" thing, and draws unnecessary attention to themselves. DDL - Feels very relaxed and natural, saying things as they come to his mind.
Null Luca Blight - He just hasn't done much yet.
Slaxx - Gut, and I also dislike post 66.
Clidd - He simply feels like he's trying too hard. He calls Ico's interactions with Ame "well-intentioned". Despite this, he still puts Ico as a nullish read. Some of his reads simply don't make much sense. He townreads Hectic for playing a character, and scumreads Kanna and I for something related to Ame's RQS, and doesn't elaborate on it at all. His post 88 also feels like he made it hard to read on purpose.
Scum Datisi - Gets too many pagetops. Leave some for the rest of us!

Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2020 1:05 pm
by Compath
In post 106, clidd wrote:
In post 98, Kanna wrote:Ok wait, I just noticed something about clidd's wall. Why wasn't slaxx included?
I forgot about him, did the post quickly.
I highly doubt you "did that post quickly"

The first quote about Ame was very unnecessarily long. You also go through a meta read on Ame. You bother to link the games you were referencing, and even color coded and bolded certain words.

Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2020 1:06 pm
by Compath
Despite having such a long and detailed scum case on Ame (half of which you could've just deleted and we still would've understood it perfectly fine), you quickly go over Kanna and I in
one sentence
without any real explanation.

Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2020 1:10 pm
by Compath
In post 109, Compath wrote:Town | the worst - My favorite duckling. Quack! :)
Kanna - Questioning others and actively generating content. They're participating in interactions that they don't really need to.
Hectic - Still a quality memer, like usual. Despite putting up an act as this Officer "Officer" Officer guy, he feels surprisingly natural.
Iconeum - Gut, and also sort of meta read. Asking questions and actively pressuring Ame. | Ame - Doubles down on the "Answer my RQS" thing, and draws unnecessary attention to themselves. | DDL - Feels very relaxed and natural, saying things as they come to his mind.
Null | Luca Blight - He just hasn't done much yet.
Slaxx - Gut, and I also dislike post 66.
Clidd - He simply feels like he's trying too hard. He calls Ico's interactions with Ame "well-intentioned". Despite this, he still puts Ico as a nullish read. Some of his reads simply don't make much sense. He townreads Hectic for playing a character, and scumreads Kanna and I for something related to Ame's RQS, and doesn't elaborate on it at all. His post 88 also feels like he made it hard to read on purpose.
Scum | Datisi - Gets too many pagetops. Leave some for the rest of us!
I kinda screwed up the spacing...

I put multiple spaces so that the names would have some space in between each other as well as not being too close to town, null, and scum so it wouldn't confuse you guys.

But for some reason that doesn't work.

Oh well I fixed it here at least.

Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2020 1:11 pm
by Compath
VOTE: Clidd

May or may not have forgotten to vote him, but we don't talk about that.

Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2020 1:11 pm
by Compath
If you talk about it, you might get N1ed.

Just warning you :)

Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2020 1:29 pm
by Hectic
Officer "Officer" Officer back from her break.

Please ask Professor Clidd whether he has Kanna and Compath as "scum-indicative" due to their short answers to the RQS. Why are short answers lawbreaker-indicative? Simply because he once gave short answers as a lawbreaker?
In post 90, Kanna wrote:wow (´• ‸ •`✿)
Already bringing out the power roles means Citizen Kanna must be feeling desperate.
In post 91, Kanna wrote:Sorry Officer/trainer, must've confused you for someone else! Also no I guess...

About slaxx: partially, but some of his other posts also felt weird on first pass. I'll explain it soon. Why did you like them?
Inform Emoji Kanna that what I asked her about are things I disliked upon a second look at slaxx' posts.
In post 94, Compath wrote:
In post 10, Luca Blight wrote:VOTE: Compath

For being a strawberry thief.
This is a baseless accusation. If you truly have sufficient evidence, you should take it up with my colleague, Officer "Officer" Officer, or his trainee, trainee "trainee" trainee.*

*may take up to 15 working days for Officer "Officer" Officer, or his trainee, trainee "trainee" trainee to review and respond to your case on why they may be town/scum.
Thank Deputy Compath for passing this on to me. Knight Luca will have to provide sufficient evidence for this matter to be taken any more seriously by the Strawberry Investigation Bureau.
In post 95, Compath wrote:Will things get
hectic
if I refuse to stop making puns?
Deputy, don't make me come path into your office and make a Compath pun.

.
.
.

Further investigation is required.

Image

Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2020 1:44 pm
by Hectic
Officer "Officer" Officer back with further investigation.

Deputy Compath, is the exclusion of Ame deliberate from your reads list? I like the look of those reads other than the Clidd one, which I am undecided on. The logic he uses can often be hard to fully grasp, but more often than not can yield results.
For example, he pins the full lawbreaker team of 3 on page 7 here. How do you think the logic/tone of that post compares with the one here? I believe those reasons for lawbreaker-reading him may be NAI, but I do see other things worth interrogating (Reasons for Kanna and yourself being lawbreaker-indicative).
In post 103, Compath wrote:Isn't Team Rocket supposed to be scum?

Is trainee "trainee" trainee like the evil side of Officer "Officer" Officer?
trainee "trainee" trainee is a highly motivated member of our Department. I have great expectations for her; regardless of her past.

.
.
.

I am on Annual Leave tomorrow, so expect my duties to be taken up by Cop "Cop" Cop. You will adore him. I hope.

Image

Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2020 1:47 pm
by DrDolittle
I thought post 8 was all right, and can justify the stupid pun entrance

Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2020 1:56 pm
by DrDolittle
im feeling generous. gonna hand out a couple of preemptive town reads:
ame compath ico and kanna for now.

please come up and claim your rewards

Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2020 2:35 pm
by Ame
In post 116, Hectic wrote: Deputy Compath, is the exclusion of Ame deliberate from your reads list?
Not reading I see
In post 118, DrDolittle wrote:im feeling generous. gonna hand out a couple of preemptive town reads:
ame compath ico and kanna for now.

please come up and claim your rewards
Spoiler:
Image

Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2020 3:30 pm
by DrDolittle
here you go
Spoiler: gift
Image

Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2020 4:00 pm
by clidd
Im back.

Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2020 4:01 pm
by clidd
In post 6, Ame wrote:Hello! Everyone, please answer these very important questions. I've spent thousands of hours researching questions that are guaranteed to distinguish scum from town. If everyone answers, we should know the scum team within the first page!

1. What is the origin of your username?
2. Why is Compath so townie?
3. When is the last time you had a strawberry?
4. Which of these would you prefer to spend your time doing this weekend (order from most preferred to least): playing mafia, attending a concert, attending a sports game, watching a new episode of your favorite show.
5. On a scale of 0 to 10, how upset would you be if we lynched you today?
6. If Hectic has 5 strawberries and DrDolittle has 2, how many does Luca have?
7. Imagine that you are scum this game: would it be true or false that you are scum?

VOTE: DrDoLittle

for voting a townie
1. It's a nickname I saw on the internet and decided to copy it.

2. You are probably judging post as a comic relief, something more commonly associated with people comfortable with their current situation, which, in this case, would indicate a connection to the
green alignment
. This is a very subjective and variable aspect from player to player, so I would say it is
wrong
, but could be
correct
if you link to past games with similar behavioral pattern.

3. I consumed one yesterday, extremely tasty. I don't know if anything changes in terms of taste, if we compare the geographical distance (Im from Spain), but it is quite common to have fairs here filled with them every day.

4. I would prefer, first, to play mafia, considering that it is an activity that I can perform sitting down, without physical effort. Secondly, it would be watching a new episode of my favorite show, thirdly attending a concert (I would prefer to avoid it), and lastly attending a sports game (which I would also like to avoid).

5. It would depend on whether I'm close to solving the game or not. Now, for example, I would classify it as 0, because the approach that I decided to adopt in this match, specifically, did not include reactions to votes on day 1. But, if I felt that there is a greater interest, as well as a significant contribution, that margin would increase to 10, proceeding exponentially.

6. Since Hectic is, at least as far as I speculate, a good person(town), he would donate 2 strawberries to Luca, so that he would match DrDolittle. In the final count it would be: Hectic (3) | DrDolittle (2) | Luca (2)

7. Imagining something that didn't happen is a serious retroactive reasoning. But, to complete the last question:
false
.

Waiting the result.

Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2020 4:01 pm
by clidd
In post 115, Hectic wrote:Officer "Officer" Officer back from her break.

Please ask Professor Clidd whether he has Kanna and Compath as "scum-indicative" due to their short answers to the RQS. Why are short answers lawbreaker-indicative? Simply because he once gave short answers as a lawbreaker?

Image
Perhaps. The main purpose was to instigate future interaction, although intuitively, I classify the vague responses as small suggestive clues, which do not necessarily correspond to an alignment. In this case, it would depend on the interpretive analysis employed, which, in the context of my past departure, is something that gives me an initial '' horizon '' in this beginning of the match. If you want to collaborate and also engage with the scum indicatives, I would appreciate it.

Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2020 4:01 pm
by clidd
In post 118, DrDolittle wrote:im feeling generous. gonna hand out a couple of preemptive town reads:
ame compath ico and kanna for now.

please come up and claim your rewards
I would praise the inaccuracy in your reads, but I believe you will probably find out eventually.